Literature DB >> 23315749

MP2.5 and MP2.X: approaching CCSD(T) quality description of noncovalent interaction at the cost of a single CCSD iteration.

Robert Sedlak1, Kevin E Riley, Jan Řezáč, Michal Pitoňák, Pavel Hobza.   

Abstract

The performance of the second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory MP2.5 and MP2.X methods, tested on the S22, S66, X40, and other benchmark datasets is briefly reviewed. It is found that both methods produce highly accurate binding energies for the complexes contained in these data sets. Both methods also provide reliable potential energy curves for the complexes in the S66 set. Among the routinely used wavefunction methods, the only other technique that consistently produces lower errors, both for stabilization energies and geometry scans, is the spin-component-scaled coupled-clusters method covering iterative single- and double-electron excitations, which is, however, substantially more computationally intensive. The structures originated from full geometrical gradient optimizations at the MP2.5 and MP2.X level of theory were confirmed to be the closest to the CCSD(T)/CBS (coupled clusters covering iterative single- and double-electron excitations and perturbative triple-electron excitations performed at the complete basis set limit) geometries among all the tested methods (e.g. MP3, SCS(MI)-MP2, MP2, M06-2X, and DFT-D method evaluated with the TPSS functional). The MP2.5 geometries for the tested complexes deviate from the references almost negligibly. Inclusion of the scaled third-order correlation energy results in a substantial improvement of the ability to accurately describe noncovalent interactions. The results shown here serve to support the notion that MP2.5 and MP2.X are reasonable alternative methods for benchmark calculations in cases where system size or (lack of) computational resources preclude the use of CCSD(T)/CBS computations. MP2.X allows for the use of smaller basis sets (i.e. 6-31G*) with results that are nearly identical to those of MP2.5 with larger basis sets, which dramatically decreases computation times and makes calculations on much larger systems possible.
Copyright © 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23315749     DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201200850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemphyschem        ISSN: 1439-4235            Impact factor:   3.102


  6 in total

1.  Theoretical study (CC2, DFT and PCM) of charge transfer complexes between antithyroid thioamides and TCNE: electronic CT transitions.

Authors:  Pavel Mach; Šimon Budzák; György Juhász; Miroslav Medveď; Ondrej Kyseľ
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Adsorption of Organic Molecules to van der Waals Materials: Comparison of Fluorographene and Fluorographite with Graphene and Graphite.

Authors:  František Karlický; Eva Otyepková; Rabindranath Lo; Michal Pitoňák; Petr Jurečka; Martin Pykal; Pavel Hobza; Michal Otyepka
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  The Adsorption of Small Molecules on the Copper Paddle-Wheel: Influence of the Multi-Reference Ground State.

Authors:  Marjan Krstić; Karin Fink; Dmitry I Sharapa
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Assessment of the Second-Order Statically Screened Exchange Correction to the Random Phase Approximation for Correlation Energies.

Authors:  Arno Förster
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.578

5.  A machine learning correction for DFT non-covalent interactions based on the S22, S66 and X40 benchmark databases.

Authors:  Ting Gao; Hongzhi Li; Wenze Li; Lin Li; Chao Fang; Hui Li; LiHong Hu; Yinghua Lu; Zhong-Min Su
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.514

6.  Performance of Electronic Structure Methods for the Description of Hückel-Möbius Interconversions in Extended π-Systems.

Authors:  Tatiana Woller; Ambar Banerjee; Nitai Sylvetsky; Golokesh Santra; Xavier Deraet; Frank De Proft; Jan M L Martin; Mercedes Alonso
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 2.781

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.