Literature DB >> 23315295

Maternal recall of prescription medication use during pregnancy using a paper-based questionnaire: a validation study in the Netherlands.

Marleen M H J van Gelder1, Iris A L M van Rooij, Hermien E K de Walle, Nel Roeleveld, Marian K Bakker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In case-control studies that assess associations between medication use and birth defects, detailed information on type of medication and timing of use is essential to prevent misclassification. However, data on the accuracy of recall of medication use during pregnancy are scarce.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate a self-administered questionnaire to assess prescription medication use in the 3 months before and during pregnancy.
METHODS: This validation study was embedded in Eurocat Northern Netherlands, a population-based birth defects registry that covers 10% of all births in The Netherlands. The questionnaire was validated among 560 mothers of infants with major birth defects registered from 1 January 2009 through 30 June 2010 by comparing it with a reference standard consisting of pharmacy data which were checked for compliance by maternal interviews. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to quantify validity for any prescription medication use, groups of medications and individual medications. In addition, we determined whether maternal characteristics influenced disagreement between the questionnaire and the reference standard using logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: The sensitivity for any prescription medication use was 0.57, ranging between 0.07 (dermatological corticosteroids) and 0.83 (antihypertensives) for medication groups, and between 0.00 (naproxen) and 0.73 (salbutamol) for individual medications. Overall, specificity was high (0.93-1.00). Smoking during pregnancy and completing the questionnaire>2 years after delivery were associated with increased disagreement between the questionnaire for prescription medication use and the reference standard.
CONCLUSIONS: The validity of the self-administered questionnaire for prescription medication use during pregnancy was moderate to poor for most medications and disagreement differed by some maternal characteristics. As many epidemiological studies use similar questionnaires to assess medication use these studies may need additional data sources such as pharmacy records or prescription databases for medication use next to self-reported methods. Also, previous knowledge on the effect of questionnaire design should be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23315295     DOI: 10.1007/s40264-012-0004-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  37 in total

1.  Influence of question structure on the recall of self-reported drug use.

Authors:  O H Klungel; A de Boer; A H Paes; R M Herings; J C Seidell; A Bakker
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Drug use in first pregnancy and lactation: a population-based survey among Danish women. The EUROMAP group.

Authors:  C Olesen; F H Steffensen; G L Nielsen; L de Jong-van den Berg; J Olsen; H T Sørensen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Prescription drug use among fathers and mothers before and during pregnancy. A population-based cohort study of 106,000 pregnancies in Norway 2004-2006.

Authors:  Anders Engeland; Jørgen G Bramness; Anne Kjersti Daltveit; Marit Rønning; Svetlana Skurtveit; Kari Furu
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  An investigation of report bias in a case-control study of pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  S G Mackenzie; A Lippman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  A descriptive study of the use of the Internet by women seeking pregnancy-related information.

Authors:  Margareta Larsson
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.372

6.  Medical record validation of maternally reported birth characteristics and pregnancy-related events: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

Authors:  J E Olson; X O Shu; J A Ross; T Pendergrass; L L Robison
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  A comparison of pregnancy history recall and medical records. Implications for retrospective studies.

Authors:  B C Tilley; A B Barnes; E Bergstralh; D Labarthe; K L Noller; T Colton; E Adam
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Effect of questionnaire design on recall of drug exposure in pregnancy.

Authors:  A A Mitchell; L B Cottler; S Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 9.  Questionnaire design and the recall of pharmacological treatments: a systematic review.

Authors:  Helena Gama; Sofia Correia; Nuno Lunet
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Factors affecting a mother's recall of her baby's birth weight.

Authors:  A Rosemary Tate; Carol Dezateux; Tim J Cole; Leslie Davidson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  23 in total

1.  Using bayesian models to assess the effects of under-reporting of cannabis use on the association with birth defects, national birth defects prevention study, 1997-2005.

Authors:  Marleen M H J van Gelder; A Rogier T Donders; Owen Devine; Nel Roeleveld; Jennita Reefhuis
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Prescription drug use during and immediately before pregnancy in Hawai'i—findings from the Hawai'i Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2009-2011.

Authors:  Emily K Roberson; Eric L Hurwitz
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2014-12

3.  Maternal Hypertension, Antihypertensive Medication Use, and Small for Gestational Age Births in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.

Authors:  Sarah C Fisher; Alissa R Van Zutphen; Paul A Romitti; Marilyn L Browne
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-02

4.  Validation of maternal recall of early pregnancy medication exposure using prospective diary data.

Authors:  Alexandra C Sundermann; Katherine E Hartmann; Sarah H Jones; Eric S Torstenson; Digna R Velez Edwards
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  The Impact of Nondifferential Exposure Misclassification on the Performance of Propensity Scores for Continuous and Binary Outcomes: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Mollie E Wood; Stavroula Chrysanthopoulou; Hedvig M E Nordeng; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 6.  Use of antipsychotic medications in pediatric populations: what do the data say?

Authors:  Robert B Penfold; Christine Stewart; Enid M Hunkeler; Jeanne M Madden; Janet R Cummings; Ashli A Owen-Smith; Rebecca C Rossom; Christine Y Lu; Frances L Lynch; Beth E Waitzfelder; Karen J Coleman; Karen A Coleman; Brian K Ahmedani; Arne L Beck; John E Zeber; Gregory E Simon
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Depression, Anxiety, and Pharmacotherapy Around the Time of Pregnancy in Hawaii.

Authors:  Emily K Roberson; Eric L Hurwitz; Dongmei Li; Robert V Cooney; Alan R Katz; Abby C Collier
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08

8.  Medication use and drug-related problems among women at maternity wards-a cross-sectional study from two Norwegian hospitals.

Authors:  J Smedberg; M Bråthen; M S Waka; A F Jacobsen; G Gjerdalen; H Nordeng
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Agreement Between Maternal Report and Medical Records During Pregnancy: Medications for Rheumatoid Arthritis and Asthma.

Authors:  Kristin Palmsten; Avanthi Hulugalle; Gretchen Bandoli; Grace M Kuo; Shayda Ansari; Ronghui Xu; Christina D Chambers
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.980

10.  The effect of antidepressants on fertility.

Authors:  Marianne M Casilla-Lennon; Samantha Meltzer-Brody; Anne Z Steiner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.