Literature DB >> 23315060

The right of the donor to information about children conceived from his or her gametes.

Inez Raes1, An Ravelingien, Guido Pennings.   

Abstract

The field of gamete donation for medically assisted reproduction purposes is evolving. While anonymous gamete donation was long the preferred practice, a new focus on the rights and interests of donor-conceived children has led a number of countries to shift towards an open-identity system. However, this evolution appears to overlook whether information exchange could also be of interest to the other parties involved, in particular the gamete donors. In this article, we analyse the question whether donors should be granted a right to some information about the offspring conceived by their donations. We constructed five arguments which donors could use in support of such a claim: (i) It can be of great importance to the donors' and their own children's health that they receive medical information (in particular, evidence of an unsuspected genetic disease) about the donor offspring; (ii) basic information (such as whether any children were born) could be a way to acknowledge donors for their altruistic behaviour; (iii) general information (information about the child's wellbeing) about the donor offspring could ease the donors' potential concern about and sense of responsibility for the offspring; (iv) basic information could provide an important enrichment of the donors' identities; (v) identifying information would be useful for donors who want to contact the donor offspring. No strong arguments in favour of granting donors the right to identifying information were found. An exchange of this type of information should only be accepted when all parties agree. Taken together, the four first arguments form a strong case for granting donors a right to several types of anonymous information about the donor offspring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23315060     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  Sperm donors describe the experience of contact with their donor-conceived offspring.

Authors:  R Hertz; M K Nelson; W Kramer
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2015

2.  Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response.

Authors:  Karin Hammarberg; Louise Johnson; Kate Bourne; Jane Fisher; Maggie Kirkman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  The opposite of a step parent - The genetics without any of the emotion: 'sperm donors' reflections on identity-release donation and relatedness.

Authors:  Susanna Graham
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2021-06-24

4.  The forgotten group of donor-conceived persons.

Authors:  Guido Pennings
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-07-04

5.  Gamete donors' expectations and experiences of contact with their donor offspring.

Authors:  Maggie Kirkman; Kate Bourne; Jane Fisher; Louise Johnson; Karin Hammarberg
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.

Authors:  C Lampic; A Skoog Svanberg; G Sydsjö
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Italian law on medically assisted reproduction: do women's autonomy and health matter?

Authors:  Irene Riezzo; Margherita Neri; Stefania Bello; Cristoforo Pomara; Emanuela Turillazzi
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 2.809

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.