PURPOSE: Minimal lymph node involvement is a potential prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. The International Union Against Cancer defined tumour deposits between 0.2 and 2 mm as micrometastases and clusters and single-cell infiltrations below this cutoff as isolated tumour cells. Nevertheless, only a minority of studies discriminated metastatic involvements according to this definition. METHODS: In order to investigate the prognostic significance of micrometastases (0.2-2 mm), we performed a retrospective study enrolling 44 routinely diagnosed micrometastatic cases within 15 years which represent about 1% of our cases. These cases have been re-evaluated. RESULTS: Seven of the micrometastatic cases turned out to be macrometastases after step sectioning. Complete follow-up was available in 33 remaining cases. Collections of node-negative and macrometastatic cases served as control groups. The Kaplan-Meier curves of macro- and micrometastatic cases showed a similar adverse course (p = 0.830) especially during the first 40 months. The 5-year-survival rates were 51, 60 and 64 months for macro-, micrometastatic and node-negative cases, respectively. The difference in overall survival, however, reached only a statistical trend and was not significant (p = 0.137). After re-evaluation with step sections and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry out of an initial 91 node-negative cases, 11 (12%) cases were identified with isolated tumour cells and one (1%) case with a micrometastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that micro- and macrometastatic colorectal cancers show very similar survival rates. Therefore, efforts to improve the detection of lymph node micrometastases seem to be justified.
PURPOSE: Minimal lymph node involvement is a potential prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. The International Union Against Cancer defined tumour deposits between 0.2 and 2 mm as micrometastases and clusters and single-cell infiltrations below this cutoff as isolated tumour cells. Nevertheless, only a minority of studies discriminated metastatic involvements according to this definition. METHODS: In order to investigate the prognostic significance of micrometastases (0.2-2 mm), we performed a retrospective study enrolling 44 routinely diagnosed micrometastatic cases within 15 years which represent about 1% of our cases. These cases have been re-evaluated. RESULTS: Seven of the micrometastatic cases turned out to be macrometastases after step sectioning. Complete follow-up was available in 33 remaining cases. Collections of node-negative and macrometastatic cases served as control groups. The Kaplan-Meier curves of macro- and micrometastatic cases showed a similar adverse course (p = 0.830) especially during the first 40 months. The 5-year-survival rates were 51, 60 and 64 months for macro-, micrometastatic and node-negative cases, respectively. The difference in overall survival, however, reached only a statistical trend and was not significant (p = 0.137). After re-evaluation with step sections and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry out of an initial 91 node-negative cases, 11 (12%) cases were identified with isolated tumour cells and one (1%) case with a micrometastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that micro- and macrometastatic colorectal cancers show very similar survival rates. Therefore, efforts to improve the detection of lymph node micrometastases seem to be justified.
Authors: Bruno Märkl; Hans M Arnholdt; Hendrik Jähnig; Hanno Spatz; Matthias Anthuber; Daniel V Oruzio; Therese Gannon Kerwel Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Masaki Hata; Junji Machi; Jonathan Mamou; Eugene T Yanagihara; Emi Saegusa-Beecroft; Gregory K Kobayashi; Clifford C M Wong; Conway Fung; Ernest J Feleppa; Kazuhiro Sakamoto Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: W Schmiegel; A Reinacher-Schick; D Arnold; U Graeven; V Heinemann; R Porschen; J Riemann; C Rödel; R Sauer; M Wieser; W Schmitt; H-J Schmoll; T Seufferlein; I Kopp; C Pox Journal: Z Gastroenterol Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Anton J Bilchik; Dave S B Hoon; Sukamal Saha; Roderick R Turner; David Wiese; Maggie DiNome; Kazuo Koyanagi; Martin McCarter; Perry Shen; Douglas Iddings; Steven L Chen; Maria Gonzalez; David Elashoff; Donald L Morton Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Daniel J Lips; Boukje Koebrugge; Gerrit Jan Liefers; Johannes C van de Linden; Vincent T H B M Smit; Hans F M Pruijt; Hein Putter; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Koop Bosscha Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: M Ankersmit; H J Bonjer; G Hannink; L J Schoonmade; M H G M van der Pas; W J H J Meijerink Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 3.781