Literature DB >> 23314763

Optimizing electrode configuration for electrical impedance measurements of muscle via the finite element method.

Mina Jafarpoor1, Jia Li, Jacob K White, Seward B Rutkove.   

Abstract

Electrical impedance myography (EIM) is a technique for the evaluation of neuromuscular diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and muscular dystrophy. In this study, we evaluated how alterations in the size and conductivity of muscle and thickness of subcutaneous fat impact the EIM data, with the aim of identifying an optimized electrode configuration for EIM measurements. Finite element models were developed for the human upper arm based on anatomic data; material properties of the tissues were obtained from rat and published sources. The developed model matched the frequency-dependent character of the data. Of the three major EIM parameters, resistance, reactance, and phase, the reactance was least susceptible to alterations in the subcutaneous fat thickness, regardless of electrode arrangement. For example, a quadrupling of fat thickness resulted in a 375% increase in resistance at 35 kHz but only a 29% reduction in reactance. By further optimizing the electrode configuration, the change in reactance could be reduced to just 0.25%. For a fixed 30 mm distance between the sense electrodes centered between the excitation electrodes, an 80 mm distance between the excitation electrodes was found to provide the best balance, with a less than 1% change in reactance despite a doubling of subcutaneous fat thickness or halving of muscle size. These analyses describe a basic approach for further electrode configuration optimization for EIM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23314763      PMCID: PMC3984469          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2237030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  14 in total

1.  Spatial dependence of the phase in localized bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Authors:  C A Shiffman; R Aaron; A Altman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Electrical impedance myography to assess outcome in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials.

Authors:  Seward B Rutkove; Hui Zhang; David A Schoenfeld; Elizabeth M Raynor; Jeremy M Shefner; Merit E Cudkowicz; Anne B Chin; Ronald Aaron; Carl A Shiffman
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Utilizing a handheld electrode array for localized muscle impedance measurements.

Authors:  Pushpa Narayanaswami; Andrew J Spieker; Phillip Mongiovi; John C Keel; Stefan C Muzin; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Anisotropy in the dielectric properties of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  B R Epstein; K R Foster
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  The effect of subacute denervation on the electrical anisotropy of skeletal muscle: implications for clinical diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Mohammad A Ahad; Pushpa Narayanaswami; Lora J Kasselman; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Localized bioimpedance analysis in the evaluation of neuromuscular disease.

Authors:  Seward B Rutkove; Ronald Aaron; Carl A Shiffman
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Discriminating neurogenic from myopathic disease via measurement of muscle anisotropy.

Authors:  Lindsay P Garmirian; Anne B Chin; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  Electrical characteristics of rat skeletal muscle in immaturity, adulthood and after sciatic nerve injury, and their relation to muscle fiber size.

Authors:  Mohammad A Ahad; P Michelle Fogerson; Glenn D Rosen; Pushpa Narayanaswami; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 9.  Electrical impedance myography: Background, current state, and future directions.

Authors:  Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Impact of skin-subcutaneous fat layer thickness on electrical impedance myography measurements: an initial assessment.

Authors:  A W Tarulli; A B Chin; K S Lee; S B Rutkove
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  19 in total

1.  Toward Electrical Impedance Tomography Coupled Ultrasound Imaging for Assessing Muscle Health.

Authors:  Ethan K Murphy; Joseph Skinner; Maria Martucci; Seward B Rutkove; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Electrical impedance myography for the in vivo and ex vivo assessment of muscular dystrophy (mdx) mouse muscle.

Authors:  Jia Li; Tom R Geisbush; Glenn D Rosen; Jennifer Lachey; Aaron Mulivor; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Tongue electrical impedance in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis modeled using the finite element method.

Authors:  Adam Pacheck; Alex Mijailovic; Sung Yim; Jia Li; Jordan R Green; Courtney E McIlduff; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Electrical impedance myography for assessment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Seward B Rutkove; Kush Kapur; Craig M Zaidman; Jim S Wu; Amy Pasternak; Lavanya Madabusi; Sung Yim; Adam Pacheck; Heather Szelag; Tim Harrington; Basil T Darras
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Reducing sample size requirements for future ALS clinical trials with a dedicated electrical impedance myography system.

Authors:  Jeremy M Shefner; Seward B Rutkove; James B Caress; Michael Benatar; William S David; Michael S Cartwright; Eric A Macklin; Jose L Bohorquez
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.092

6.  Optimizing electrical impedance myography measurements by using a multifrequency ratio: a study in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Stefan Schwartz; Tom R Geisbush; Aleksandar Mijailovic; Amy Pasternak; Basil T Darras; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 7.  Electrical Impedance Myography and Its Applications in Neuromuscular Disorders.

Authors:  Benjamin Sanchez; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.620

8.  Sensitivity distribution simulations of surface electrode configurations for electrical impedance myography.

Authors:  Seward B Rutkove; Adam Pacheck; Benjamin Sanchez
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Electrical impedance myography in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A 1-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Karlien Mul; Chad Heatwole; Katy Eichinger; Nuran Dilek; William B Martens; Baziel G M Van Engelen; Rabi Tawil; Jeffrey M Statland
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Age- and gender-associated differences in electrical impedance values of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Hans G J Kortman; Sarah C Wilder; Tom R Geisbush; Pushpa Narayanaswami; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 2.833

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.