Literature DB >> 23314551

Performance evaluation of human cytokines profiles obtained by various multiplexed-based technologies underlines a need for standardization.

Anne Marie Dupuy1, Nils Kuster, Gérard Lizard, Kévin Ragot, Sylvain Lehmann, Benoît Gallix, Jean Paul Cristol.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiplexed methods permit simultaneous quantification of multiple cytokines. As several manufacturers offer reagents to quantify the same cytokines on a single instrument, comparison of the distribution should be made to determine whether these data are comparable from one assay to another.
METHODS: We performed the quantification of cytokines in serum samples with three commercially available assays: Cytometric Bead Array (CBA), Protein Biochip Array Technology (PBAT), and Luminex Technology analysis. Using detection limit and reference range of the three commercial multiplex technologies, we evaluated: 1) the overall distribution of cytokines; and 2) the clinical impact.
RESULTS: The three cytokines, IL-1β, IL-1α and IL-4, cannot be measured by these methods because of the high number of non-detected data (>50%). By contrast, four cytokines as IL-8, VEGF, MCP-1 and EGF exhibited a low percentage of non-detected data whatever method was used. The comparison of the percentage of samples with values higher than the respective reference range of each method reported an absence of clinical concordance (Cohen's κ-test <0.40).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the lack of transferability between the three commercially available multiplex methods evaluated (CBA, PBAT and Luminex Technology). Analytical performances are adequate for longitudinal studies using a same methodology but caution should be used for comparisons between results obtained with different methods underlying a need for standardization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23314551     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  5 in total

1.  Development of an Enhanced Sensitivity Bead-Based Immunoassay for Real-Time In Vivo Detection of Pancreatic β-Cell Death.

Authors:  Olivier R Costa; Geert Stangé; Katrijn Verhaeghen; Benedicte Brackeva; Ellen Nonneman; Christiane S Hampe; Zhidong Ling; Daniel Pipeleers; Frans K Gorus; Geert A Martens
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 4.736

2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of preanalytical factors and methodological differences influencing the measurement of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor.

Authors:  Ulrika Sjöbom; Anders K Nilsson; Hanna Gyllensten; Ann Hellström; Chatarina Löfqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Measurement of Circulating Cytokines and Immune-Activation Markers by Multiplex Technology in the Clinical Setting: What Are We Really Measuring?

Authors:  Najib Aziz
Journal:  For Immunopathol Dis Therap       Date:  2015

4.  Role of biomarkers in the management of antibiotic therapy: an expert panel review: I - currently available biomarkers for clinical use in acute infections.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Dupuy; François Philippart; Yves Péan; Sigismond Lasocki; Pierre-Emmanuel Charles; Martin Chalumeau; Yann-Eric Claessens; Jean-Pierre Quenot; Christele Gras-Le Guen; Stéphanie Ruiz; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Nicolas Roche; Jean-Paul Stahl; Jean-Pierre Bedos; Jérôme Pugin; Rémy Gauzit; Benoit Misset; Christian Brun-Buisson
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 6.925

5.  Cytokine Response Associated with Hepatitis C Virus Clearance in HIV Coinfected Patients Initiating Peg Interferon-α Based Therapy.

Authors:  Truong Tam Nguyen; Reihani Niloofar; Pierre-Alain Rubbo; Kuster Nils; Karine Bollore; Jacques Ducos; Georges-Philippe Pageaux; Jacques Reynes; Philippe Van de Perre; Edouard Tuaillon
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 2.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.