OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the literature on quality of life (QoL) of gynecologic cancer survivors, their needs and preferences regarding follow-up, and possible predictors of long-term QoL. METHODS: A systematic literature search was made in the following databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Bibliotek.dk, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and SveMed+. We searched the period 1995-2012 for English-language literature. The search was made during July 2011 to February 2012. When possible, the search was made using MeSH terms. Additional reports were collected by systematically viewing the reference lists of the retrieved articles. RESULTS: Overall studies indicate that survivors after gynecologic cancer do not have impaired QoL in the long term. In general, the patients are highly satisfied with the follow-up program. The patients' greatest concern is fear of recurrence. The most frequent reported unmet need is help in dealing and living with the fear of recurrence. It seems that psychosocial status at time of diagnosis is determining for QoL and well-being in the long term. Association has been found between coping style and QoL, risk of depression, and anxiety in the long term after cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Even though long-term QoL does not seem to be impaired, the patients are struggling with fear of recurrence, and the way of coping with this fear is a possible predictor for long-term QoL after cancer. However, there is a lack of evidence on QoL, needs, and preferences regarding follow-up of the survivors after gynecologic cancer. The quality of the follow-up regimen is questionable, and it is not evidence based. Thus, it is extremely important to optimize the follow-up program and move focus to life quality. There is a need for an evidence-based strategy regarding follow-up for low-risk gynecologic cancer patients.
OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the literature on quality of life (QoL) of gynecologic cancer survivors, their needs and preferences regarding follow-up, and possible predictors of long-term QoL. METHODS: A systematic literature search was made in the following databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Bibliotek.dk, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and SveMed+. We searched the period 1995-2012 for English-language literature. The search was made during July 2011 to February 2012. When possible, the search was made using MeSH terms. Additional reports were collected by systematically viewing the reference lists of the retrieved articles. RESULTS: Overall studies indicate that survivors after gynecologic cancer do not have impaired QoL in the long term. In general, the patients are highly satisfied with the follow-up program. The patients' greatest concern is fear of recurrence. The most frequent reported unmet need is help in dealing and living with the fear of recurrence. It seems that psychosocial status at time of diagnosis is determining for QoL and well-being in the long term. Association has been found between coping style and QoL, risk of depression, and anxiety in the long term after cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Even though long-term QoL does not seem to be impaired, the patients are struggling with fear of recurrence, and the way of coping with this fear is a possible predictor for long-term QoL after cancer. However, there is a lack of evidence on QoL, needs, and preferences regarding follow-up of the survivors after gynecologic cancer. The quality of the follow-up regimen is questionable, and it is not evidence based. Thus, it is extremely important to optimize the follow-up program and move focus to life quality. There is a need for an evidence-based strategy regarding follow-up for low-risk gynecologic cancerpatients.
Authors: Susan K Lutgendorf; Eileen Shinn; Jeanne Carter; Susan Leighton; Keith Baggerly; Michele Guindani; Bryan Fellman; Marianne Matzo; George M Slavich; Marc T Goodman; William Tew; Jenny Lester; Kathleen M Moore; Beth Y Karlan; Douglas A Levine; Anil K Sood Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Jacqueline Feinberg; Karen Carthew; Emily Webster; Kaity Chang; Nita McNeil; Dennis S Chi; Kara Long Roche; Ginger Gardner; Oliver Zivanovic; Yukio Sonoda Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Nicole P M Ezendam; Belle H de Rooij; Roy F P M Kruitwagen; Carien L Creutzberg; Ingrid van Loon; Dorry Boll; M Caroline Vos; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse Journal: Trials Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 2.279