AIMS: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) use in a range of situations involving temporary abstinence (TA), and the rated helpfulness of NRT. It also aimed to determine whether associations existed between reported helpfulness of NRT and use of NRT in different situations, with previous attempts to quit smoking and cigarette consumption. METHOD: Smokers aged 16+ were interviewed in a national household survey in England. Participants were asked whether they used NRT (i.e. patch, gum, lozenges/tablets, inhalator (inhaler) and nasal spray) for TA in the office, at home, in a pub, restaurant and/or while travelling. Rated helpfulness of NRT and quit attempts in the previous 12months were also assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen percent of smokers reported using NRT for TA. Forty-one percent of these used NRT at home, 40% while travelling, 22% in bars, 20% in an office and 16% in restaurants. The inhalator and patch received higher helpfulness ratings than the gum. The use of NRT in all situations was associated with increased odds of a previous attempt to quit smoking compared with smokers not using NRT for TA. Ratings of the helpfulness of NRT were not associated with either recent attempts to quit smoking or cigarette consumption. CONCLUSION: One in eight smokers reported the use of NRT for TA. The most common occasions being the use at home and while travelling. Use of NRT in situations when one is unable to smoke may increase propensity to quit smoking regardless of the specific type of situation and whether NRT is rated by the smoker as helpful in that situation.
AIMS: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) use in a range of situations involving temporary abstinence (TA), and the rated helpfulness of NRT. It also aimed to determine whether associations existed between reported helpfulness of NRT and use of NRT in different situations, with previous attempts to quit smoking and cigarette consumption. METHOD: Smokers aged 16+ were interviewed in a national household survey in England. Participants were asked whether they used NRT (i.e. patch, gum, lozenges/tablets, inhalator (inhaler) and nasal spray) for TA in the office, at home, in a pub, restaurant and/or while travelling. Rated helpfulness of NRT and quit attempts in the previous 12months were also assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen percent of smokers reported using NRT for TA. Forty-one percent of these used NRT at home, 40% while travelling, 22% in bars, 20% in an office and 16% in restaurants. The inhalator and patch received higher helpfulness ratings than the gum. The use of NRT in all situations was associated with increased odds of a previous attempt to quit smoking compared with smokers not using NRT for TA. Ratings of the helpfulness of NRT were not associated with either recent attempts to quit smoking or cigarette consumption. CONCLUSION: One in eight smokers reported the use of NRT for TA. The most common occasions being the use at home and while travelling. Use of NRT in situations when one is unable to smoke may increase propensity to quit smoking regardless of the specific type of situation and whether NRT is rated by the smoker as helpful in that situation.
Authors: Jamie Brown; Peter Hajek; Hayden McRobbie; Jo Locker; Fiona Gillison; Andy McEwen; Emma Beard; Robert West Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Emma Beard; Jamie Brown; Sarah Jackson; Robert West; Will Anderson; Deborah Arnott; Lion Shahab Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 8.775