BACKGROUND & AIMS: Parenteral nutrition is known as a high-risk factor for central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection (CVC-RBSI) in cancer patients. Owing to ethical and technical problems, the studies in the literature have nonrandomized designs and are therefore often confounded by biases. We performed a propensity score analysis to estimate the effect of parenteral nutrition on CVC-RBSI in digestive cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively. A logistic regression model was used to calculate a propensity score, which was the probability of receiving parenteral nutrition. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression model were used to estimate the effect of the parenteral nutrition on CVC-RBSI after adjustment for the propensity score. RESULTS: Before the propensity score analysis, the differences between patients with (n = 113) and without (n = 312) parenteral nutrition were identified including: male gender, body weight, weight loss, performance status, location of primary cancer, FOLFIRI, and previous long-term corticotherapy. After propensity score stratification, all of the covariates were balanced within each stratum. After adjustment, patients with parenteral nutrition were at a higher risk for CVC-RBSI. CONCLUSION: By using the propensity score analysis, this study confirmed that parenteral nutrition was an independent risk factor for CVC-RBSI in digestive cancer patients.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Parenteral nutrition is known as a high-risk factor for central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection (CVC-RBSI) in cancerpatients. Owing to ethical and technical problems, the studies in the literature have nonrandomized designs and are therefore often confounded by biases. We performed a propensity score analysis to estimate the effect of parenteral nutrition on CVC-RBSI in digestive cancerpatients who underwent chemotherapy. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively. A logistic regression model was used to calculate a propensity score, which was the probability of receiving parenteral nutrition. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression model were used to estimate the effect of the parenteral nutrition on CVC-RBSI after adjustment for the propensity score. RESULTS: Before the propensity score analysis, the differences between patients with (n = 113) and without (n = 312) parenteral nutrition were identified including: male gender, body weight, weight loss, performance status, location of primary cancer, FOLFIRI, and previous long-term corticotherapy. After propensity score stratification, all of the covariates were balanced within each stratum. After adjustment, patients with parenteral nutrition were at a higher risk for CVC-RBSI. CONCLUSION: By using the propensity score analysis, this study confirmed that parenteral nutrition was an independent risk factor for CVC-RBSI in digestive cancerpatients.
Authors: Melissa A Shenep; Mary R Tanner; Yilun Sun; Tina Culley; Randall T Hayden; Patricia M Flynn; Li Tang; Joshua Wolf Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Marie Lecronier; Sandrine Valade; Naike Bigé; Nicolas de Prost; Damien Roux; David Lebeaux; Eric Maury; Elie Azoulay; Alexandre Demoule; Martin Dres Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 6.925