Literature DB >> 23313275

The torque-velocity relationship in large human muscles: maximum voluntary versus electrically stimulated behaviour.

Matthew T G Pain1, Fraser Young, Jinwoo Kim, Stephanie E Forrester.   

Abstract

The in vivo maximum voluntary torque-velocity profile for large muscle groups differs from the in vitro tetanic profile with lower than expected eccentric torques. Using sub-maximal transcutaneous electrical stimulation has given torque-velocity profiles with an eccentric torque plateau ∼1.4 times the isometric value. This is closer to, but still less than, the in vitro tetanic profiles with plateaus between 1.5 and 1.9 times isometric. This study investigated the maximum voluntary and sub-maximum transcutaneous electrical stimulated torque-angle-angular velocity profiles for the knee extensors and flexors in a group of healthy males. Fifteen male subjects performed maximum voluntary and sub-maximum electrically stimulated (∼40% for extensors and ∼20% for flexors) eccentric and concentric knee extension and flexions on an isovelocity dynamometer at velocities ranging from ±50°s(-1) to ±400°s(-1). The ratio of peak eccentric to peak isometric torque (T(ecc)/T(0)) was compared between the maximum voluntary and electrically stimulated conditions for both extensors and flexors, and between muscle groups. Under maximum voluntary conditions the peak torque ratio, T(ecc)/T(0), remained close to 1 (0.9-1.2) while for the electrically stimulated conditions it was significantly higher (1.4-1.7; p<0.001) and within the range of tetanic values reported from in vitro studies. In all but one case there was no significant difference in ratios between the extensors and flexors. The results showed that even the largest muscle groups have an intrinsic T(ecc)/T(0) comparable with in vitro muscle tests, and it can be ascertained from appropriate in vivo testing.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23313275     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.11.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  Strength and size relationships of the quadriceps and hamstrings with special reference to reciprocal muscle balance.

Authors:  Pavlos E Evangelidis; Garry J Massey; Matthew T G Pain; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The hamstrings to quadriceps functional ratio expressed over the full angle-angular velocity range using a limited number of data points.

Authors:  Dimitrios Voukelatos; Pavlos E Evangelidis; Matthew T G Pain
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.653

3.  Interdependence of torque, joint angle, angular velocity and muscle action during human multi-joint leg extension.

Authors:  Daniel Hahn; Walter Herzog; Ansgar Schwirtz
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Neuromuscular Adaptations to Work-matched Maximal Eccentric versus Concentric Training.

Authors:  Sumiaki Maeo; Xiyao Shan; Shun Otsuka; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Yasuo Kawakami
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Electrically stimulated eccentric contraction during non-weight bearing knee bending exercise in the supine position increases oxygen uptake: A randomized, controlled, exploratory crossover trial.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tajima; Hiroo Matsuse; Ryuki Hashida; Takeshi Nago; Masafumi Bekki; Sohei Iwanaga; Eriko Higashi; Naoto Shiba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.