Shyam Patel1, Muta M Issa, Rizk El-Galley. 1. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL 35294-3411, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a formula that incorporates age, prostate volume, race, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level into a single score for prostate cancer detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a PSA-age volume (AV) score by multiplying the patient age by the prostate volume and dividing it by the PSA level. The PSA-AV was developed using 1000 prostate biopsy specimens and was validated on 318 internal and 4406 external biopsy specimens. RESULTS: We analyzed 1000 biopsy specimens (mean age 63 ± 8 years, 63% white and 35% black, mean PSA 6.8 ± 4 ng/mL, mean prostate volume 41 ± 18 cm(3), mean PSA-AV 485 ± 304). Of the 1000 biopsy specimens, 556 (55.6%) had positive findings. A lower PSA-AV score correlated with a greater cancer risk (R(2) = 0.91). A PSA-AV score of 700 had a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 35%, respectively. These values matched or exceeded the sensitivity and specificity for age-adjusted PSA level and a PSA cutoff of 4 ng/mL. Compared with using the age-adjusted PSA level, using a score of 700 increased the number of biopsies by 64 and detected 62 more cancers. Using a PSA-AV cutoff of 700, rather than a PSA cutoff of 4 ng/mL, led to 16 fewer biopsies with 7 additional cancers detected. Our data were internally and externally validated. CONCLUSION: According to our data, a PSA-AV score has shown to be a useful formula for predicting positive biopsy findings. A PSA-AV score of 700 is useful in ruling out cancer in younger patients and patients with small prostates, and in ruling in cancer in older patients and patients with a large prostate.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a formula that incorporates age, prostate volume, race, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level into a single score for prostate cancer detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a PSA-age volume (AV) score by multiplying the patient age by the prostate volume and dividing it by the PSA level. The PSA-AV was developed using 1000 prostate biopsy specimens and was validated on 318 internal and 4406 external biopsy specimens. RESULTS: We analyzed 1000 biopsy specimens (mean age 63 ± 8 years, 63% white and 35% black, mean PSA 6.8 ± 4 ng/mL, mean prostate volume 41 ± 18 cm(3), mean PSA-AV 485 ± 304). Of the 1000 biopsy specimens, 556 (55.6%) had positive findings. A lower PSA-AV score correlated with a greater cancer risk (R(2) = 0.91). A PSA-AV score of 700 had a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 35%, respectively. These values matched or exceeded the sensitivity and specificity for age-adjusted PSA level and a PSA cutoff of 4 ng/mL. Compared with using the age-adjusted PSA level, using a score of 700 increased the number of biopsies by 64 and detected 62 more cancers. Using a PSA-AV cutoff of 700, rather than a PSA cutoff of 4 ng/mL, led to 16 fewer biopsies with 7 additional cancers detected. Our data were internally and externally validated. CONCLUSION: According to our data, a PSA-AV score has shown to be a useful formula for predicting positive biopsy findings. A PSA-AV score of 700 is useful in ruling out cancer in younger patients and patients with small prostates, and in ruling in cancer in older patients and patients with a large prostate.
Authors: Natalia Cernei; Zbynek Heger; Jaromir Gumulec; Ondrej Zitka; Michal Masarik; Petr Babula; Tomas Eckschlager; Marie Stiborova; Rene Kizek; Vojtech Adam Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Sean Harrison; Kate Tilling; Emma L Turner; J Athene Lane; Andrew Simpkin; Michael Davis; Jenny Donovan; Freddie C Hamdy; David E Neal; Richard M Martin Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Young Min Kim; Sungchan Park; June Kim; Seonghun Park; Ji Ho Lee; Dong Soo Ryu; Seong Hoon Choi; Sang Hyeon Cheon Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.759
Authors: Dariga S Smailova; Elisa Fabbro; Serik E Ibrayev; Luca Brusati; Yuliya M Semenova; Umutzhan S Samarova; Farida S Rakhimzhanova; Sabit M Zhussupov; Zaituna A Khismetova; Hengameh Hosseini Journal: Prostate Cancer Date: 2020-01-27