BACKGROUND: Athletic pubalgia (AP) is a chronic debilitating syndrome that affects many athletes. As a syndrome, AP is difficult to diagnose both with clinical examination and imaging. AP is also a challenge for conservative intervention with randomized controlled trials showing mixed success rates. In other syndromes where clinical diagnosis and conservative treatment have been less than clear, a paradigm has been suggested as a framework for clinical decision making. OBJECTIVES: To propose a new clinical diagnostic and treatment paradigm for the conservative management of AP. DESIGN: Relevant studies were viewed with regard to diagnosis and intervention and where a gap in evidence existed, clinical expertise was used to fill that gap and duly noted. RESULTS: A new paradigm is proposed to assist with clinical diagnosis and non-surgical intervention in patients suffering with AP. The level of evidence supporting this paradigm, according to the SORT taxonomy, is primarily level 2B. CONCLUSIONS: Further testing is warranted but following the suggested paradigm should lead to a clearer diagnosis of AP and allow more meaningful research into homogeneous patient populations within the AP diagnostic cluster. Strength-of-Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): 2B.
BACKGROUND:Athletic pubalgia (AP) is a chronic debilitating syndrome that affects many athletes. As a syndrome, AP is difficult to diagnose both with clinical examination and imaging. AP is also a challenge for conservative intervention with randomized controlled trials showing mixed success rates. In other syndromes where clinical diagnosis and conservative treatment have been less than clear, a paradigm has been suggested as a framework for clinical decision making. OBJECTIVES: To propose a new clinical diagnostic and treatment paradigm for the conservative management of AP. DESIGN: Relevant studies were viewed with regard to diagnosis and intervention and where a gap in evidence existed, clinical expertise was used to fill that gap and duly noted. RESULTS: A new paradigm is proposed to assist with clinical diagnosis and non-surgical intervention in patients suffering with AP. The level of evidence supporting this paradigm, according to the SORT taxonomy, is primarily level 2B. CONCLUSIONS: Further testing is warranted but following the suggested paradigm should lead to a clearer diagnosis of AP and allow more meaningful research into homogeneous patient populations within the AP diagnostic cluster. Strength-of-Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): 2B.
Authors: Russell J Coppack; James L Bilzon; Andrew K Wills; Ian M McCurdie; Laura Partridge; Alastair M Nicol; Alexander N Bennett Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Russell J Coppack; James L Bilzon; Andrew K Wills; Ian M McCurdie; Laura K Partridge; Alastair M Nicol; Alexander N Bennett Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2016-04-01