Literature DB >> 23311740

Corneal higher order aberrations after myopic wavefront-optimized ablation.

David Smadja1, Marcony R Santhiago, Glauco R Mello, David Touboul, Michael Mrochen, Ronald R Krueger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the induced corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) after wavefront-optimized ablation.
METHODS: Sixty-four myopic eyes that underwent wavefront-optimized myopic LASIK were divided into three groups based on spherical equivalent (SE): low myopia group (23 eyes with SE <-3.00 diopters [D]); moderate myopia group (27 eyes with SE between -3.00 and -6.00 D); and high myopia group (14 eyes with SE >-6.00 D). Total corneal HOA, corneal spherical aberrations, corneal coma through a 6-mm pupil size, and corneal eccentricity were measured with a dual Scheimpflug imaging device preoperatively and 3 months after surgery.
RESULTS: An overall increase in total corneal HOA was observed with a mean of 0.18±0.18 μm (P<.01), although this induction was not statistically significant in the low myopic group with a mean of 0.006±0.15 μm (P=.85). Root-mean-square spherical aberration varied the most after myopic ablation, with an overall induction of positive spherical aberration of 0.27±0.25 μm (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the wavefront-optimized profile was designed to preserve the preoperative HOAs of the total eye, a significant induction of the corneal HOAs after myopic treatment was observed. The magnitude of the induced corneal HOA was related to the amount of intended correction. Corneal wavefront profiles do not reflect the visual performance; however, they provide relevant information, which may help in optimizing new laser treatment algorithms. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23311740     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20121210-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations for cataract surgery in eyes after phototherapeutic keratectomy.

Authors:  Yukari Yaguchi; Kazuno Negishi; Megumi Saiki; Hidemasa Torii; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Effect of Iris registration on visual outcome in wavefront-guided LASEK for myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Jong Joo Lee; Mee Kum Kim; Won Ryang Wee
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Effect of topical pilocarpine on refractive surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Kemal Ozulken; Erdem Yuksel; Mehmet Murat Uzel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Image Quality Analysis of Eyes Undergoing LASER Refractive Surgery.

Authors:  Samrat Sarkar; Pravin Krishna Vaddavalli; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of Higher Order Aberrations after Wavefront-guided LASIK and PRK: One Year Follow-Up Results.

Authors:  Seyed Hamid Reza Jahadi Hosseini; Seyed Mohammad Bagher Abtahi; Mohammad Reza Khalili
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

6.  Refractive, visual, and subjective quality of vision outcomes for very high myopia LASIK from - 10.00 to - 13.50 diopters.

Authors:  Avi Wallerstein; Joseph Wai Keung Kam; Mathieu Gauvin; Eser Adiguzel; Mounir Bashour; Ananda Kalevar; Mark Cohen
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.209

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.