Literature DB >> 23311505

Surgical management of placenta accreta: a 10-year experience.

S E Grace Tan1, Thomas W Jobling, Euan M Wallace, L Jane McNeilage, Thomas Manolitsas, Ryan J Hodges.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine maternal morbidity in primary surgical management of placenta accreta.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
SETTING: Quaternary perinatal referral center in Melbourne, Australia. POPULATION: Clinically suspected and histologically confirmed cases of placenta accreta, increta and percreta.
METHODS: Women were identified from our hospital database coded for placenta accreta, increta, percreta and peripartum hysterectomy. Relevant details were sought from medical records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predefined maternal morbidities: blood loss, transfusion requirements, surgical complications, reoperation rate, duration in hospital. Predefined neonatal outcomes: gestational age at birth, birth-weight, admission to intensive (NICU) or special care nurseries (SCN), respiratory distress syndrome.
RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2009, 33 women were diagnosised with invasive placentation. A total of 27 were confirmed histologically after hysterectomy: 12 accreta, one increta, and 14 percreta. Median blood loss was 2 L. There was a 1.8-L reduction in mean blood loss with elective vs. emergency hysterectomy (p = 0.04). Nearly two-thirds of women required four or more units of packed red-blood-cells. Half of the women suffered from surgical complications, mostly from bladder injury. The risk of returning to theater for further surgery was 20%. Women with placenta percreta were more likely to require additional blood products (p = 0.03), sustain renal tract injury (p = 0.003) and require intensive care admission (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: A primary surgical approach to management of placenta accreta is associated with significant maternal morbidity, even when managed in a dedicated quaternary perinatal referral center.
© 2013 The Authors Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica © 2013 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23311505     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  6 in total

1.  Conventional MRI features for predicting the clinical outcome of patients with invasive placenta.

Authors:  Ting Chen; Xiao Quan Xu; Hai Bin Shi; Zheng Qiang Yang; Xin Zhou; Yi Pan
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Perioperative and transfusion outcomes in women undergoing cesarean hysterectomy for abnormal placentation.

Authors:  Kathleen F Brookfield; Lawrence T Goodnough; Deirdre J Lyell; Alexander J Butwick
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Factors Contributing to Massive Blood Loss on Peripartum Hysterectomy for Abnormally Invasive Placenta: Who Bleeds More?

Authors:  Hironori Takahashi; Akihide Ohkuchi; Rie Usui; Hirotada Suzuki; Yosuke Baba; Shigeki Matsubara
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2016-08-17

4.  A comparison of antenatally and intraoperatively diagnosed cases of placenta accreta spectrum

Authors:  Rahila Imtiaz; Zubaida Masood; Samia Husain; Sonia Husain; Rubina Izhar; Saba Hussain
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2019-09-30

5.  Prophylactic uterine artery embolization assisted cesarean section for the prevention of intrapartum hemorrhage in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Qun Li; Zheng-Qiang Yang; Wasif Mohammed; Yao-Liang Feng; Hai-Bin Shi; Xin Zhou
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Incidence, risk factors and perinatal outcomes for placenta accreta in Australia and New Zealand: a case-control study.

Authors:  Cynthia M Farquhar; Zhuoyang Li; Sarah Lensen; Claire McLintock; Wendy Pollock; Michael J Peek; David Ellwood; Marian Knight; Caroline Se Homer; Geraldine Vaughan; Alex Wang; Elizabeth Sullivan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.