Literature DB >> 23311500

Sun exposure over a lifetime in Australian adults from latitudinally diverse regions.

Robyn M Lucas1, Patricia Valery, Ingrid van der Mei, Terence Dwyer, Michael P Pender, Bruce Taylor, Anne-Louise Ponsonby.   

Abstract

Spatio-temporal patterns in sun exposure underlie variations in skin cancer incidence and vitamin D deficiency, indicate effectiveness of sun protection programs and provide insights into future health risks. From 558 adults across four regions of Australia (Brisbane (27°S), Newcastle (33°S), Geelong and the Western Districts of Victoria (37°S) and Tasmania (43°S)), we collected: self-report data on time-in-the-sun from age 6 years; natural skin color and ethnicity; silicone skin casts (for cumulative skin damage); and serum for vitamin D status. Ambient ultraviolet radiation (UVR) at the location of residence, with time-in-the-sun, was used to calculate a "UVR dose" for each year of life. Individuals maintained their ranking compared to their peers for time-in-the-sun in summer compared to winter and across ages (Spearman rho 0.24-0.84, all P < 0.001). Time-in-the-sun decreased with age in all birth cohorts, and over calendar time. Summer time-in-the-sun increased with increasing latitude (P < 0.001). Seasonal variation in vitamin D status had greater amplitude and vitamin D deficiency increased with increasing latitude. Temporal patterns are consistent with effectiveness of sun protection programs. Higher relative time-in-the-sun persists from childhood through adulthood. Lower summer time-in-the-sun in the warmest location may have implications for predictions of UVR-related health risks of climate change.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Photochemistry and Photobiology © 2013 The American Society of Photobiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23311500     DOI: 10.1111/php.12044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  5 in total

1.  Genetic and environmental factors in conjunctival UV autofluorescence.

Authors:  Seyhan Yazar; Gabriel Cuellar-Partida; Charlotte M McKnight; Piriya Quach-Thanissorn; Jenny A Mountain; Minas T Coroneo; Craig E Pennell; Alex W Hewitt; Stuart MacGregor; David A Mackey
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  The associations of month of birth with body mass index, waist circumference, and leg length: findings from the China Kadoorie Biobank of 0.5 million adults.

Authors:  Jun Lv; Canqing Yu; Yu Guo; Zheng Bian; Sarah Lewington; Huiyan Zhou; Yunlong Tan; Junshi Chen; Zhengming Chen; Liming Li
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.211

Review 3.  Public health adaptation to climate change in Canadian jurisdictions.

Authors:  Stephanie E Austin; James D Ford; Lea Berrang-Ford; Malcolm Araos; Stephen Parker; Manon D Fleury
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Physical Determinants of Vitamin D Photosynthesis: A Review.

Authors:  Jonathan J Neville; Tommaso Palmieri; Antony R Young
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-01-19

5.  The Feasibility and Acceptability of Using a Wearable UV Radiation Exposure Monitoring Device in Adults and Children: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Nagelhout; Riley Lensink; Angela Zhu; Bridget G Parsons; Jakob D Jensen; Yelena P Wu
Journal:  JMIR Dermatol       Date:  2020-04-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.