Literature DB >> 23311112

Follow-up after a failed newborn hearing screen: a quality improvement study.

Christy M Cockfield1, Gloria D Garner, Jack C Borders.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has been implemented for several decades to screen for congenital hearing loss; however, the lost to follow-up (LFU) rate for newborns with a failed screen is nearly 50%. Many studies have examined risk factors rendering infants susceptible to being LFU, but there are no quality improvement studies using evidence-based practice that aim to improve follow-up rates. This study utilized a nurse practitioner (NP) to provide a teaching intervention to educate parents on recommended follow-up after a failed hearing screen, including the Healthy People 2020 objectives.
METHODS: Seventeen newborn/mother couplets were recruited to participate in a multi-site quality improvement project over a six week period prior to hospital discharge. At the bedside with the NP, mothers completed a demographic survey and were provided education on Georgia's UNHS Program and recommended follow-up based on the Healthy People 2020 objectives. An appointment with the hospital's audiologist was given to the mother in writing. A retrospective chart review was performed three months after the newborn's birth to document follow-up with audiology or to see if the infant was lost to follow-up for audiologic evaluation (LFUAE).
RESULTS: Of the 17 newborns enrolled, 14 had adequate follow-up with audiology within three months of birth. Hospital A showed statistical significance with one newborn that was LFUAE when compared to the nation LFU rate (n=12, p=0.01). Prior to project intervention, Hospital B had a 70% LFUAE rate; however, its post intervention LFUAE rate decreased to 40% (n=5). Statistical significance was unable to be obtained due to small sample size. Two mothers reported smoking during pregnancy and both of their newborns were LFUAE.
CONCLUSIONS: This project suggests that education by the NP prior to hospital discharge was statistically significant at Hospital A. Health care providers should actively engage in educating parents regarding expected follow-up guidelines and incorporating the Healthy People 2020 objectives. Further studies are needed that can also examine the six month follow-up with pediatric otolaryngology for hearing aid fitting and early intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23311112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ORL Head Neck Nurs        ISSN: 1064-3842


  3 in total

1.  Expanding the Role of Educational Audiologists After a Failed Newborn Hearing Screening: A Quality Improvement Study.

Authors:  Caitlin Sapp; Jonathan Stirn; Tammy O'Hollearn; Elizabeth A Walker
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  Newborn Hearing Screening in a Public Maternity Ward in Curitiba, Brazil: Determining Factors for Not Retesting.

Authors:  Idalina Luz; Angela Ribas; Lorena Kozlowski; Mariluci Willig; Ana Paula Berberian
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-16

3.  Challenges and Solutions in Implementing Hearing Screening Program in India.

Authors:  Abhiruchi Galhotra; Preeti Sahu
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.