Literature DB >> 2330929

Live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccine in school-age children.

W C Gruber1, L H Taber, W P Glezen, R D Clover, T D Abell, R W Demmler, R B Couch.   

Abstract

In 1985, we enrolled 189 school-age children by family in a double-blind study to determine protection against influenza by a single dose of cold-recombinant bivalent A vaccine or commercial trivalent inactivated vaccine compared with placebo. All children in school or day care, 3 to 18 years of age, in an enrolled family received the same preparation. Following vaccination, 60% and 21% of cold-recombinant bivalent A vaccine recipients and 73% and 83% of trivalent inactivated vaccine recipients demonstrated fourfold or greater response in hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titer to A/H1N1 and A/H3N2, respectively. Sixty-seven percent of all trivalent inactivated vaccine recipients demonstrated a fourfold or greater serologic response to H1N1, H3N2, and influenza B following a single dose of vaccine. During the 1985-1986 influenza B/Ann Arbor epidemic, heterotypic protection afforded by the influenza B/USSR component of trivalent inactivated vaccine was 62% compared with placebo. A single dose of trivalent inactivated vaccine protected school-age children, 6 to 19 years of age, from influenza B infection; the rate of protection was 64% against infection and 73% against febrile illness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2330929     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150290089035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dis Child        ISSN: 0002-922X


  29 in total

1.  Immunogenicity of trivalent influenza vaccine in extremely low-birth-weight, premature versus term infants.

Authors:  Carl T D'Angio; Roy J Heyne; Shahnaz Duara; Lucy C Holmes; T Michael O'Shea; Hongyue Wang; Dongwen Wang; Pablo J Sánchez; Robert C Welliver; Rita M Ryan; Kenneth C Schnabel; Caroline B Hall
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Response to influenza virus vaccination in vertical HIV infection.

Authors:  E G Lyall; A Charlett; P Watkins; M Zambon
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Statement on influenza vaccination for the 1992-93 season.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Cellular immune responses in children and adults receiving inactivated or live attenuated influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Xiao-Song He; Tyson H Holmes; Caiqiu Zhang; Kutubuddin Mahmood; George W Kemble; David B Lewis; Cornelia L Dekker; Harry B Greenberg; Ann M Arvin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Statement on influenza vaccination for the 1991-92 season.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Recommendations for the prevention and control of influenza during the 1990-91 season.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Statement on influenza vaccination for the 1995-96 season. National Advisory Committee on Immunization.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Economic benefits of inactivated influenza vaccines in the prevention of seasonal influenza in children.

Authors:  Luis Salleras; Encarna Navas; Nuria Torner; Andreu A Prat; Patricio Garrido; Núria Soldevila; Angela Domínguez
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Influenza surveillance in an urban area.

Authors:  W P Glezen
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1993-09

Review 10.  Role of influenza vaccine for healthy children in the US.

Authors:  Stan L Block
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.