Literature DB >> 23308391

Comparative study of a new organic selenium source v. seleno-yeast and mineral selenium sources on muscle selenium enrichment and selenium digestibility in broiler chickens.

Mickaël Briens1, Yves Mercier, Friedrich Rouffineau, Veronique Vacchina, Pierre-André Geraert.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted on broiler chickens to compare the effect of a new organic Se source, 2-hydroxy-4-methylselenobutanoic acid (HMSeBA; SO), with two practical Se additives, sodium selenite (SS) and Se yeast (SY). The relative bioavailability of the different Se sources was compared on muscle (pectoralis major) total Se, selenomethionine (SeMet) and selenocysteine (SeCys) concentrations and apparent digestibility of total Se (ADSe). In the first experiment, from day (d) 0 to d21, Se sources were tested at different supplied levels and compared with an unsupplemented diet (NC). No significant effects were observed on growth performance during the experimental period. However, the different Se sources and levels improved muscle Se concentration compared with the NC, with a significant source effect in the following order: SS < SY < SO (P<0·05). Seleno-amino acids speciation results for NC, SY and SO at 0·3 mg Se/kg feed indicated that muscle Se was only present as SeMet or SeCys, showing a full conversion of Se by the bird. The second experiment (d0-d24) compared SS, SY or SO at 0·3 mg Se/kg feed. The ADSe measurements carried out between d20 and d23 were 24, 46 and 49% for SS, SY and SO, respectively, with significant differences between the organic and mineral Se sources (P<0·05). These results confirmed the higher bioavailability of organic Se sources compared with the mineral source and demonstrated a significantly better efficiency of HMSeBA compared with SY for muscle Se enrichment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23308391     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114512005545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  16 in total

1.  Effects of bacterial organic selenium, selenium yeast and sodium selenite on antioxidant enzymes activity, serum biochemical parameters, and selenium concentration in Lohman brown-classic hens.

Authors:  A I Muhammad; A M Dalia; T C Loh; H Akit; Anjas A Samsudin
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Hydroxy-selenomethionine as an organic source of selenium in the diet improves boar reproductive performance in artificial insemination programs.

Authors:  Ana Paula P Pavaneli; Cristian H G Martinez; Denis H Nakasone; Ana C Pedrosa; Maitê V Mendonça; Simone M M K Martins; Giulia K V Kawai; Ken K Nagai; Marcilio Nichi; Garros V Fontinhas-Netto; Naiara S Fagundes; Diego V Alkmin; André F C de Andrade
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The Effects of Selenium-Enriched Probiotics on Growth Performance, Oocysts Shedding, Intestinal Cecal Lesion Scores, Antioxidant Capacity, and mRNA Gene Expression in Chickens Infected with Eimeria tenella.

Authors:  Berhe Mekonnen Mengistu; Habtom Kiros Bitsue; Kehe Huang
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Selenium in pig nutrition and reproduction: boars and semen quality-a review.

Authors:  Peter F Surai; Vladimir I Fisinin
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Selenium alleviates porcine nephrotoxicity of ochratoxin A by improving selenoenzyme expression in vitro.

Authors:  Fang Gan; Hongxia Xue; Yu Huang; Cuiling Pan; Kehe Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of dietary selenium source (organic vs. mineral) and muscle pH on meat quality characteristics of pigs.

Authors:  Luis Calvo; Fidel Toldrá; Ana I Rodríguez; Clemente López-Bote; Ana I Rey
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Selenium source and level on performance, selenium retention and biochemical responses of young broiler chicks.

Authors:  Pedro Righetti Arnaut; Gabriel da Silva Viana; Lucimauro da Fonseca; Warley Junior Alves; Jorge Cunha Lima Muniz; James Eugene Pettigrew; Fabyano Fonseca E Silva; Horácio Santiago Rostagno; Melissa Izabel Hannas
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Comparison of Selenium Source in Preventing Oxidative Stress in Bovine Mammary Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Lingling Sun; Fang Wang; Zhaohai Wu; Lu Ma; Craig Baumrucker; Dengpan Bu
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  The influence of selenium and selenoproteins on immune responses of poultry and pigs.

Authors:  Tina S Dalgaard; Mickaël Briens; Ricarda M Engberg; Charlotte Lauridsen
Journal:  Anim Feed Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.247

10.  Selenium-Enriched Yeast Relieves Hexavalent Chromium Toxicity by Inhibiting NF-κB Signaling Pathway in Broiler Spleens.

Authors:  Yanbing Zhao; Dezheng Hao; Huan Zhang; Jingqiu Wang; Ci Liu
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.