| Literature DB >> 23308335 |
Moses M Obimbo1, Julius A Ogeng'o, Hassan Saidi.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Uterine artery undergoes structural modifications at different physiologic states. It is expected that due to its unique course, hemodynamic stresses in the vessel would vary resulting in differences in arterial dimensions. The objective of this study was to investigate regional morphometric changes in the human uterine artery.Entities:
Keywords: Morphometry; pregnancy; reproductive; uterine artery
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23308335 PMCID: PMC3527064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Figure 1Harvesting sites from uterine artery (PUA: Proximal Uterine artery, MUA: Middle Uterine artery, DUA: Distal Uterine artery)
Figure 2Morphometric measurements of uterine artery
Figure 3Medial thickness in different regions of uterine artery by gravid status (PUA: Proximal Uterine artery, MUA: Middle Uterine artery, DUA: Distal Uterine artery)
Mean luminal diameters proximal, middle and distal of uterine arteries segments by gravid status (N = 192)
| Segment of uterine artery | Gravid status | Mean luminal diameter (mm) ± SD | Average % increase in diameter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proximal | Gravid | 1.94 ± 0.27 | 22 |
| Non gravid | 1.59 ± 0.13 | ||
| Middle | Gravid | 1.74 ± 0.76 | 14.5 |
| Non gravid | 1.52 ± 0.12 | ||
| Distal | Gravid | 1.42 ± 0.33 | 20.3 |
| Non gravid | 1.18 ± 0.23 |
Mean intimal thickness of the uterine artery segments by gravid status
| Segment of uterine artery | Gravid status | Mean intimal thickness (µm ±SD) |
|---|---|---|
| Proximal | Gravid | 127 ± 12 |
| Non gravid | 188 ± 9 | |
| Middle | Gravid | 101 ± 14 |
| Non gravid | 151 ± 16 | |
| Distal | Gravid | 82 ± 7 |
| Non gravid | 138 ± 9 |
Wall thickness: luminal diameter ratios of segments of uterine artery by gravid status
| Segment of uterine artery | Gravid status | Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Proximal | Gravid | 3:10 |
| Non gravid | 4:10 | |
| Middle | Gravid | 3:10 |
| Non gravid | 4:10 | |
| Distal | Gravid | 3:10 |
| Non gravid | 4:10 |