Literature DB >> 23307930

Mid- and long-term follow-up experience in patients with malignant superior vena cava obstruction.

Richie Chiu-Lung Chan1, Yiu Che Chan, Stephen Wing-Keung Cheng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Superior vena cava obstruction (SVCO) due to mitotic diseases is a serious condition with significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to examine the follow-up data and demographics of patients with SVCO admitted to the Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, over a 14-year period.
METHODS: The prospectively entered clinical data of patients with SVCO in Queen Mary Hospital from October 1997 to September 2011 were retrospectively analysed. All patient records were electronically and manually searched. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves analysis. The Mantel-Cox log-rank test was used to test for statistically significant differences. Demographic data, associated aetiology, intervention and outcome were studied. Only patients with malignant aetiologies were included.
RESULTS: A total of 104 patients (81 males and 23 females) were recruited in our study period. Median age at presentation was 65 (range 3-91 years). The median follow-up period was 2 months. The commonest cause of SVCO was bronchogenic carcinoma (71%), followed by extrathoracic malignancies (16%), lymphoma (8%) and thymic malignancy (3%). The mean time from the onset of symptoms to presentation was 34 days. Steroids were prescribed for most (93.9%) of the patients. About half (54.4%) of the patients were given radiotherapy. Only 7 patients had angioplasty and all of them had stents inserted. The overall survival was poor. The mean and median survivals were 8.4 and 1.6 months, respectively. Seventeen percent of patients died in the same hospitalization as for their initial presentations. Younger age (50 years or below; P = 0.000), never smoker (P = 0.012), not using steroids (P = 0.007) and certain primary aetiologies (e.g. lymphoma; P = 0.008) were associated with longer overall survival on univariate analysis. However, on multivariate analysis, none of these factors reached statistical significance. The mean survival for cases with lymphoma, extrathoracic malignancies, bronchogenic tumours and thymic tumours was 80.1, 3.4, 3.1 and 1.8 months, respectively. Angioplasty did not show a statistically significant association with the overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: This study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to study the prognostic factors that may affect survival outcome in malignant SVCO. We showed that in patients with malignant aetiology for SVCO, advanced age (more than 50), history of smoking and use of steroids were statistically significantly associated with a poor outcome. The underlying primary malignant aetiology also has an important prognostic significance. Despite advances in medicine, the prognosis of patients with SVCO is still grave.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23307930      PMCID: PMC3598049          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  16 in total

1.  Helical CT phlebography of the superior vena cava: diagnosis and evaluation of venous obstruction.

Authors:  S D Qanadli; M El Hajjam; F Bruckert; O Judet; O Barré; S Chagnon; P Lacombe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The superior vena cava syndrome.

Authors:  M M SCHECHTER
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1954-01       Impact factor: 2.378

3.  Superior vena cava obstruction: is stenting necessary?

Authors:  P Y Marcy; N Magné; F Bentolila; J Drouillard; J N Bruneton; B Descamps
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Nonmalignant superior vena cava syndrome: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Branislav Schifferdecker; James A Shaw; Thomas C Piemonte; Andrew C Eisenhauer
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Superior vena caval obstruction. Is it a medical emergency?

Authors:  D E Schraufnagel; R Hill; J A Leech; J A Pare
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  A contemporary perspective on superior vena cava syndrome.

Authors:  J C Chen; F Bongard; S R Klein
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Superior vena cava syndrome: treatment with catheter-directed thrombolysis and endovascular stent placement.

Authors:  S T Kee; L Kinoshita; M K Razavi; U R Nyman; C P Semba; M D Dake
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Etiologic considerations in superior vena cava syndrome.

Authors:  J M Parish; R F Marschke; D E Dines; R E Lee
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Superior vena cava syndrome. The myth--the facts.

Authors:  A Yellin; A Rosen; N Reichert; Y Lieberman
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1990-05

Review 10.  Superior vena cava syndrome: a contemporary review of a historic disease.

Authors:  Susan Cheng
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.644

View more
  5 in total

1.  Management of superior vena cava syndrome in critically ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah Morin; Adeline Grateau; Danielle Reuter; Eric de Kerviler; Constance de Margerie-Mellon; Cédric de Bazelaire; Lara Zafrani; Benoit Schlemmer; Elie Azoulay; Emmanuel Canet
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Symptom relief, prognostic factors, and outcome in patients receiving urgent radiation therapy for superior vena cava syndrome : A single-center retrospective analysis of 21 years' practice.

Authors:  Manuel Guhlich; Teresa Esther Maag; Leif Hendrik Dröge; Rami A El Shafie; Andrea Hille; Sandra Donath; Markus Anton Schirmer; Olga Knaus; Friedemann Nauck; Tobias Raphael Overbeck; Marc Hinterthaner; Wolfgang Körber; Stefan Andreas; Achim Rittmeyer; Martin Leu; Stefan Rieken
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Favourable Prognosis when Lung-Cancer Patients with Superior Vena Cava Obstruction (SVCO) are Referred Promptly to EBUS-TBNA Prior to Medical or Surgical Management.

Authors:  Leon G D'Cruz; Bassam Younes; F Anthony Lai; Syed Arshad Husain
Journal:  Jacobs J Pulmonol       Date:  2015-08-12

4.  Clinical analysis of 48 cases of malignant superior vena cava syndrome.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Dianyuan Li; Manzhen Sun; Xiaoli Chen; Hongfei Li; Xudong Zhang; Xiaofei Wang; Ruipan Zheng; Guowen Li
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Case Report: Superior Vena Cava Resection and Reconstruction for Invasive Thyroid Cancer: Report of Three Cases and Literature Review.

Authors:  Wenjie Chen; Jianyong Lei; Yichao Wang; Xiaojun Tang; Bin Liu; Zhihui Li; Qinghua Zhou
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-06-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.