Literature DB >> 23307548

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: recent evidence and clinical pharmacy applications.

Michael E Ernst1.   

Abstract

Conventional office blood pressure readings are a well-established surrogate for the prediction of cardiovascular risk. It is assumed that these readings reflect an underlying average level of blood pressure exposure occurring in an individual over a period of time. But because blood pressure is not static, important additional prognostic information about the diurnal blood pressure profile, including within-day and between-day variability, is not easily ascertained from conventional measurements. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provides a more thorough depiction of the underlying blood pressure level and predicts cardiovascular risk more robustly than do conventional blood pressure measurements. Although the technology has been available for more than 30 years, there has been an expansion of the research base in the past decade supporting its role in the evaluation and management of patients with hypertension and as an important surrogate in research trials. This review summarizes recent evidence supporting the predictive ability of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and briefly highlights opportunities for clinical pharmacists to adopt this important clinical and research tool.
© 2013 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23307548     DOI: 10.1002/phar.1167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  4 in total

1.  Chronotherapy in practice: the perspective of the community pharmacist.

Authors:  Gagandeep Kaur; Yuh-Lin Gan; Craig L Phillips; Keith Wong; Bandana Saini
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-12-07

2.  Physician Acceptance of a Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Treatment Model for Hypertension Management in Primary Care.

Authors:  Steven M Smith; Michaela Hasan; Amy G Huebschmann; Richard Penaloza; Wagner Schorr-Ratzlaff; Amber Sieja; Nicholai Roscoe; Katy E Trinkley
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Amlodipine+benazepril is superior to hydrochlorothiazide+benazepril irrespective of baseline pulse pressure: subanalysis of the ACCOMPLISH trial.

Authors:  Per H Skoglund; Per Svensson; Joline Asp; Björn Dahlöf; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Kenneth A Jamerson; Michael A Weber; Yan Jia; Dion H Zappe; Jan Östergren
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  Mechanical Sensors for Cardiovascular Monitoring: From Battery-Powered to Self-Powered.

Authors:  Chuyu Tang; Zhirong Liu; Linlin Li
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.