Literature DB >> 23307539

Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship pathway with daptomycin for optimal treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Ravina Kullar1, Susan L Davis, Keith S Kaye, Donald P Levine, Jason M Pogue, Michael J Rybak.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a clinical pathway using daptomycin in patients with bacteremia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates exhibiting vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) greater than 1 mg/L.
DESIGN: Two-phase quasi-experimental study.
SETTING: Level I trauma center in Detroit, Michigan. PATIENTS: The study population consisted of a total of 170 patients with MRSA bacteremia susceptible to vancomycin: 70 patients who had initial blood MRSA isolates exhibiting a vancomycin MIC > 1 mg/L and were treated with vancomycin were included in phase I (retrospective baseline period [2005-2007]) and 100 patients who were switched to daptomycin after initial vancomycin therapy according to the institutional MRSA bacteremia treatment pathway were included in phase II (the period after implementation of the treatment pathway [2008-2010]). INTERVENTION: The MRSA bacteremia treatment pathway was as follows: vancomycin therapy was initiated, optimizing target trough concentrations to 15-20 mg/L; for isolates demonstrating vancomycin MICs greater than 1 mg/L, therapy was switched to daptomycin, initiated at dosages of 6 mg/kg/day or higher.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Infection characteristics, patient outcomes, and costs were evaluated. Patient characteristics were similar between the phase I and phase II groups. Phase II patients were more likely to achieve clinical success than were phase I patients (75.0% vs 41.4%, p<0.001). Phase II patients demonstrated a shorter total hospital length of stay and shorter durations of inpatient therapy, fever, and bacteremia. Treatment during phase I was independently associated with failure. Nine patients during phase I experienced nephrotoxicity, and two patients during phase II experienced increases in creatine kinase level. Costs were similar between phases I and II ($18,385 vs $19,755, p>0.05), although the hospital readmission rate was higher in phase I (33% vs 21%, p=0.08).
CONCLUSION: Among the patients with bacteremia who had MRSA isolates that exhibited elevated vancomycin MICs, the switch to daptomycin improved clinical success without increasing treatment cost.
© 2013 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23307539     DOI: 10.1002/phar.1220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  16 in total

1.  Daptomycin Improves Outcomes Regardless of Vancomycin MIC in a Propensity-Matched Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Kimberly C Claeys; Evan J Zasowski; Anthony M Casapao; Abdalhamid M Lagnf; Jerod L Nagel; Cynthia T Nguyen; Jessica A Hallesy; Mathew T Compton; Keith S Kaye; Donald P Levine; Susan L Davis; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Reply to Eschenauer et al.

Authors:  Ravina Kullar; James A McKinnell; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Antimicrobial Stewardship: How the Microbiology Laboratory Can Right the Ship.

Authors:  Philippe Morency-Potvin; David N Schwartz; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Telavancin in vitro activity against a collection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates, including resistant subsets, from the United States.

Authors:  Rodrigo E Mendes; Helio S Sader; Robert K Flamm; David J Farrell; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Avoiding the perfect storm: the biologic and clinical case for reevaluating the 7-day expectation for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia before switching therapy.

Authors:  Ravina Kullar; James A McKinnell; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Trends in the susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to nine antimicrobial agents, including ceftobiprole, nemonoxacin, and tyrothricin: results from the Tigecycline In Vitro Surveillance in Taiwan (TIST) study, 2006-2010.

Authors:  Y-H Chen; C-Y Liu; W-C Ko; C-H Liao; P-L Lu; C-H Huang; C-T Lu; Y-C Chuang; S-M Tsao; Y-S Chen; Y-C Liu; W-Y Chen; T-N Jang; H-C Lin; C-M Chen; Z-Y Shi; S-C Pan; J-L Yang; H-C Kung; C-E Liu; Y-J Cheng; J-W Liu; W Sun; L-S Wang; K-W Yu; P-C Chiang; M-H Lee; C-M Lee; G-J Hsu; P-R Hsueh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  Economic features of antibiotic resistance: the case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Fernando Antonanzas; Carmen Lozano; Carmen Torres
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Point-Counterpoint: Should Clinical Microbiology Laboratories Report Vancomycin MICs?

Authors:  Sara L Revolinski; Christopher D Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  A current perspective on daptomycin for the clinical microbiologist.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Simon Pollett; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Daptomycin dosing based on ideal body weight versus actual body weight: comparison of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer K Ng; Lucas T Schulz; Warren E Rose; Barry C Fox; David R Andes; Kevin A Buhr; Jeffrey T Fish
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.