Literature DB >> 23307477

High variability in results of semen analysis in andrology laboratories in Tuscany (Italy): the experience of an external quality control (EQC) programme.

E Filimberti1, S Degl'Innocenti, M Borsotti, M Quercioli, P Piomboni, I Natali, M G Fino, C Caglieresi, L Criscuoli, L Gandini, A Biggeri, M Maggi, E Baldi.   

Abstract

We report the results of the first three trials of an external quality control (EQC) programme performed in 71 laboratories executing semen analysis in Tuscany Region (Italy). At the end of the second trial, participants were invited to attend a teaching course illustrating and inviting to adhere to procedures recommended by WHO (V edition). Results of the first three trials of the EQC documented a huge variability in the procedures and the results. The highest variability was found for morphology (CV above 80% for all the trials), followed by count (CV of about 60% for all the trials) and motility (CV below 30% for all the trials). When results of sperm count and morphology were divided according to the used method, mean CV values did not show significant differences. CV for morphology dropped significantly at the third trial for most methods, indicating the usefulness of the teaching course for morphology assessment. Conversely, no differences were observed after the course for motility and for most methods to evaluate count, although CV values were lower at the second and third trial for the laboratories using the Burker cytometer. When results were divided according to tertiles of activity, the lowest mean bias values (difference between each laboratory result and the median value of the results) for count and morphology were observed for laboratories in the third tertile (performing over 200 semen analysis/year). Of interest, mean bias values for concentration dropped significantly at the third trial for low activity laboratories. In conclusion, lack of agreement of results of semen analysis in Tuscany is mainly because of the activity and the experience of the laboratory. Our study points out the importance of participating in EQC programmes and periodical teaching courses as well as the use of WHO recommended standardized procedures to increase precision and to allow the use of WHO reference values.
© 2013 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23307477     DOI: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00042.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrology        ISSN: 2047-2919            Impact factor:   3.842


  15 in total

1.  Distribution of Semen Parameters Among Adolescent Males Undergoing Fertility Preservation in a Multicenter International Cohort.

Authors:  Joshua A Halpern; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Taylor P Kohn; Amir S Patel; Joon Yau Leong; Raimondo M Cervellione; David J B Keene; Emad Ibrahim; Nancy L Brackett; Dolores J Lamb; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Management of male factor infertility: position statement from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) : Endorsing Organization: Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction, and Research (SIERR).

Authors:  A Ferlin; A E Calogero; C Krausz; F Lombardo; D Paoli; R Rago; C Scarica; M Simoni; C Foresta; V Rochira; E Sbardella; S Francavilla; G Corona
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Poor reproducibility of percentage of normally shaped sperm using the World Health Organization Fifth Edition strict grading criteria.

Authors:  Karen C Baker; Anne Z Steiner; Karl R Hansen; Kurt T Barnhart; Marcelle I Cedars; Richard S Legro; Michael P Diamond; Stephen A Krawetz; Rebecca Usadi; Valerie L Baker; R Matthew Coward; Fangbai Sun; Robert Wild; Puneet Masson; James F Smith; Nanette Santoro; Heping Zhang
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2022-03-17

4.  At-home sperm testing for epidemiologic studies: Evaluation of the Trak male fertility testing system in an internet-based preconception cohort.

Authors:  Greg J Sommer; Tanran R Wang; Jon G Epperson; Elizabeth E Hatch; Amelia K Wesselink; Kenneth J Rothman; Laura L Fredriksen; Ulrich Y Schaff; Barry Behr; Michael L Eisenberg; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment.

Authors:  J Lammers; C Splingart; P Barrière; M Jean; T Fréour
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  [Inter-and intra-operator variability in the analysis of semen parameters: results from a quality control program].

Authors:  Salima Daoud; Nozha Chakroun-Feki; Afifa Sellami; Leila Ammar-Keskes; Tarek Rebai
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-10-26

Review 7.  Lack of trusted diagnostic tools for undetermined male infertility.

Authors:  Swati Pandruvada; Rachel Royfman; Tariq A Shah; Puneet Sindhwani; James M Dupree; Samantha Schon; Tomer Avidor-Reiss
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Outcomes of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles for Complete Teratozoospermia: A Case-Control Study Using Paired Sibling Oocytes.

Authors:  Nigel Pereira; Queenie V Neri; Jovana P Lekovich; Steven D Spandorfer; Gianpiero D Palermo; Zev Rosenwaks
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities.

Authors:  Christopher L R Barratt; Lars Björndahl; Christopher J De Jonge; Dolores J Lamb; Francisco Osorio Martini; Robert McLachlan; Robert D Oates; Sheryl van der Poel; Bianca St John; Mark Sigman; Rebecca Sokol; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Evaluation of the Standardization in Semen Analysis Performance According to the WHO Protocols Among Laboratories in Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Masha Ahadi; Fereshte Aliakbari; Saeedeh Latifi; Seyed Jalil Hosseini; Atossa Gharib; Abolfazl Movafagh; Zahra Abdolalian; Arash Dehghan; Arsham Moradi; Behrang Kazeminejad; Azadeh Rakhshan; Elena Jamali; Farzad Allameh; Afshin Moradi
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2019-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.