Literature DB >> 23307386

Infectivity of avian influenza virus-positive field samples for mallards: what do our diagnostic results mean?

Justin D Brown1, Rebecca Poulson, Deborah L Carter, Camille Lebarbenchon, David E Stallknecht.   

Abstract

Most surveillance programs for avian influenza (AI) virus in wild birds utilize molecular tests such as real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RRT-PCR) or virus isolation (VI) in embryonating chicken eggs. To provide insight into the relationship between positive diagnostic test results and infectivity for an avian host, we challenged Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) with Mallard-derived cloacal swab field samples found positive by VI or RRT-PCR. Six of 11 samples that were both RRT-PCR positive and VI positive infected Mallards. Sample infectivity for Mallards appeared to be dependent on concentration of infectious virus in the sample; five of the six samples that replicated in Mallards had a measurable virus titer, whereas four of the five samples that did not infect Mallards had titers below the limit of detection (10(0.9) median embryo infectious dose/0.2 mL). None of seven samples that were RRT-PCR positive and VI negative infected Mallards. These results indicate that embryonating chicken eggs are a sensitive diagnostic tool for detecting Mallards excreting infectious AI virus at a high enough concentration to infect another Mallard; however, not all cloacal swab field samples that are positive by VI or RRT-PCR are infective to another Mallard. Additionally, our results indicate that Mallards are susceptible to Mallard-origin AI viruses that have not been propagated in embryonating chicken eggs and that some of these virus strains can infect birds at titers that are lower than those typically used in experimental challenge studies. These data highlight a need to examine the effects of using egg-propagated AI viruses in experimental trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23307386     DOI: 10.7589/2011-11-322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wildl Dis        ISSN: 0090-3558            Impact factor:   1.535


  12 in total

1.  How Does Sampling Methodology Influence Molecular Detection and Isolation Success in Influenza A Virus Field Studies?

Authors:  Neus Latorre-Margalef; Alexis Avril; Conny Tolf; Björn Olsen; Jonas Waldenström
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Reassortant influenza A viruses in wild duck populations: effects on viral shedding and persistence in water.

Authors:  Camille Lebarbenchon; Srinand Sreevatsan; Thierry Lefèvre; My Yang; Muthannan A Ramakrishnan; Justin D Brown; David E Stallknecht
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  SUSCEPTIBILITY OF LAUGHING GULLS (LEUCOPHAEUS ATRICILLA) AND MALLARDS (ANAS PLATYRHYNCHOS) TO RUDDY TURNSTONE (ARENARIA INTERPRES MORINELLA) ORIGIN TYPE A INFLUENZA VIRUSES.

Authors:  Charlie S Bahnson; Rebecca L Poulson; Laura P Hollander; Jo A Crum Bradley; David E Stallknecht
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 4.  Bridge hosts, a missing link for disease ecology in multi-host systems.

Authors:  Alexandre Caron; Julien Cappelle; Graeme S Cumming; Michel de Garine-Wichatitsky; Nicolas Gaidet
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.683

5.  Prevalence of influenza A virus in live-captured North Atlantic gray seals: a possible wild reservoir.

Authors:  Wendy Blay Puryear; Mandy Keogh; Nichola Hill; Jerry Moxley; Elizabeth Josephson; Kimberly Ryan Davis; Chistopher Bandoro; Damian Lidgard; Andrea Bogomolni; Milton Levin; Shelley Lang; Michael Hammill; Don Bowen; David W Johnston; Tracy Romano; Gordon Waring; Jonathan Runstadler
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 7.163

6.  EXPERIMENTAL INFECTIONS AND SEROLOGY INDICATE THAT AMERICAN WHITE IBIS (EUDOCIUMUS ALBUS) ARE COMPETENT RESERVOIRS FOR TYPE A INFLUENZA VIRUS.

Authors:  Charlie S Bahnson; Sonia M Hernandez; Rebecca L Poulson; Robert E Cooper; Shannon E Curry; Taylor J Ellison; Henry C Adams; Catharine N Welch; David E Stallknecht
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Avian influenza: mixed infections and missing viruses.

Authors:  LeAnn L Lindsay; Terra R Kelly; Magdalena Plancarte; Seth Schobel; Xudong Lin; Vivien G Dugan; David E Wentworth; Walter M Boyce
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 8.  Using quantitative disease dynamics as a tool for guiding response to avian influenza in poultry in the United States of America.

Authors:  K M Pepin; E Spackman; J D Brown; K L Pabilonia; L P Garber; J T Weaver; D A Kennedy; K A Patyk; K P Huyvaert; R S Miller; A B Franklin; K Pedersen; T L Bogich; P Rohani; S A Shriner; C T Webb; S Riley
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.670

9.  Evaluation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibodies against the H5 subtype of Influenza A virus in waterfowl.

Authors:  Camille Lebarbenchon; Mary Pantin-Jackwood; Whitney M Kistler; M Page Luttrell; Erica Spackman; David E Stallknecht; Justin D Brown
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 4.380

10.  Infected or not: are PCR-positive oropharyngeal swabs indicative of low pathogenic influenza A virus infection in the respiratory tract of Mallard Anas platyrhynchos?

Authors:  Michelle Wille; Peter van Run; Jonas Waldenström; Thijs Kuiken
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.