Literature DB >> 23307317

Decision analytic strategies for integrating ecosystem services and risk assessment.

Katherine E von Stackelberg1.   

Abstract

Ecosystem services as a concept and guiding principle are enjoying wide popularity and endorsement from high-level policy thinkers to industry as support for sustainability goals continue to grow. However, explicit incorporation of ecosystem services into decision making still lacks practical implementation at more local scales and faces significant regulatory and technical constraints. Risk assessment represents an example of a regulatory process for which guidance exists that makes it challenging to incorporate ecosystem service endpoints. Technical constraints exist in the quantification of the relationships between ecological functions and services and endpoints valued by humans, and the complexity of those interactions with respect to bundling and stacking. In addition, ecosystem services, by their very definition, represent an anthropogenic construct with no inherent ecological value, which, in practical terms, requires a far more inclusionary decision making process explicitly incorporating a greater diversity of stakeholder values. Despite these constraints, it is possible, given a commitment to sustainable decision making, to simplify the process based on strategic outcomes (e.g., identifying desired end-states in general terms). Decision analytic techniques provide a mechanism for evaluating tradeoffs across key ecosystem services valued by stakeholders and to develop criteria drawn from the entire spectrum of stakeholders in evaluating potential alternatives. This article highlights several examples of ways in which ecosystem service endpoints can be incorporated into the decision-making process.
Copyright © 2013 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23307317     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  3 in total

1.  An Integrated Ecological Modeling System for Assessing Impacts of Multiple Stressors on Stream and Riverine Ecosystem Services within River Basins.

Authors:  John M Johnston; M Craig Barber; Kurt Wolfe; Mike Galvin; Mike Cyterski; Rajbir Parmar
Journal:  Ecol Modell       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.974

2.  Evolving Science and Practice of Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Katherine von Stackelberg; Pamela R D Williams
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply-Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services-A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed.

Authors:  Hongjuan Zhang; Juan Feng; Zhicheng Zhang; Kang Liu; Xin Gao; Zidong Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.