INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To compare the effects of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), with or without biofeedback (BF), for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), focusing on condition-specific quality of life (QOL) outcomes. METHODS:Women with SUI were randomized to PFMT with BF (BF group, n = 23) or without BF (PFMT group, n = 23) for 12 weeks. As primary outcome measures, subjective symptoms and QOL were assessed by the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). A voiding diary, 1-h pad test, and measurement of PFM strength were secondary outcome measures. Changes in the primary and secondary outcomes were assessed before and after 12 weeks' exercise training. RESULTS: Of the 9 domains of the KHQ, the scores of 5 significantly decreased in the PFMT group, and the scores of 7 significantly decreased in the BF group. All ICIQ-SF items and the total score significantly decreased in both groups after therapy. The number of incontinence episodes significantly decreased in the PFMT group, and tended to decrease in the BF group, but this was not significant (P = 0.054). The leakage volume in the 1-h pad test tended to decrease in both groups, but was not significant. Maximum vaginal squeeze pressure significantly increased in both groups. There were no significant inter-group differences in the changes in any of the parameters assessed. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that PFMT is effective for treating SUI. There is no apparent add-on effect of BF training in short-term follow-up.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To compare the effects of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), with or without biofeedback (BF), for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), focusing on condition-specific quality of life (QOL) outcomes. METHODS:Women with SUI were randomized to PFMT with BF (BF group, n = 23) or without BF (PFMT group, n = 23) for 12 weeks. As primary outcome measures, subjective symptoms and QOL were assessed by the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). A voiding diary, 1-h pad test, and measurement of PFM strength were secondary outcome measures. Changes in the primary and secondary outcomes were assessed before and after 12 weeks' exercise training. RESULTS: Of the 9 domains of the KHQ, the scores of 5 significantly decreased in the PFMT group, and the scores of 7 significantly decreased in the BF group. All ICIQ-SF items and the total score significantly decreased in both groups after therapy. The number of incontinence episodes significantly decreased in the PFMT group, and tended to decrease in the BF group, but this was not significant (P = 0.054). The leakage volume in the 1-h pad test tended to decrease in both groups, but was not significant. Maximum vaginal squeeze pressure significantly increased in both groups. There were no significant inter-group differences in the changes in any of the parameters assessed. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that PFMT is effective for treating SUI. There is no apparent add-on effect of BF training in short-term follow-up.
Authors: L C Berghmans; C M Frederiks; R A de Bie; E H Weil; L W Smeets; E S van Waalwijk van Doorn; R A Janknegt Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 1996 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Roselien Herderschee; E Jean C Hay-Smith; G Peter Herbison; Jan Paul Roovers; Maas Jan Heineman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-07-06
Authors: Bernard T Haylen; Dirk de Ridder; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Bary Berghmans; Joseph Lee; Ash Monga; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2009-11-25 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Ethan M Balk; Gaelen P Adam; Katherine Corsi; Amanda Mogul; Thomas A Trikalinos; Peter C Jeppson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Suzanne Hagen; Carol Bugge; Sarah G Dean; Andrew Elders; Jean Hay-Smith; Mary Kilonzo; Doreen McClurg; Mohamed Abdel-Fattah; Wael Agur; Federico Andreis; Joanne Booth; Maria Dimitrova; Nicola Gillespie; Cathryn Glazener; Aileen Grant; Karen L Guerrero; Lorna Henderson; Marija Kovandzic; Alison McDonald; John Norrie; Nicole Sergenson; Susan Stratton; Anne Taylor; Louise R Williams Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Malin Sjöström; Göran Umefjord; Hans Stenlund; Per Carlbring; Gerhard Andersson; Eva Samuelsson Journal: BJU Int Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Arnoud W Kastelein; Maarten F A Dicker; Brent C Opmeer; Sonia S Angles; Kaisa E Raatikainen; Joan F Alonso; Diana Tăut; Olavi Airaksinen; Linda D Cardozo; Jan-Paul W R Roovers Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 2.894