Literature DB >> 23305697

Bad split during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible with separators: a retrospective study of 427 patients.

Gertjan Mensink1, Jop P Verweij, Michael D Frank, J Eelco Bergsma, J P Richard van Merkesteyn.   

Abstract

An unfavourable fracture, known as a bad split, is a common operative complication in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). The reported incidence ranges from 0.5 to 5.5%/site. Since 1994 we have used sagittal splitters and separators instead of chisels for BSSO in our clinic in an attempt to prevent postoperative hypoaesthesia. Theoretically an increased percentage of bad splits could be expected with this technique. In this retrospective study we aimed to find out the incidence of bad splits associated with BSSO done with splitters and separators. We also assessed the risk factors for bad splits. The study group comprised 427 consecutive patients among whom the incidence of bad splits was 2.0%/site, which is well within the reported range. The only predictive factor for a bad split was the removal of third molars at the same time as BSSO. There was no significant association between bad splits and age, sex, class of occlusion, or the experience of the surgeon. We think that doing a BSSO with splitters and separators instead of chisels does not increase the risk of a bad split, and is therefore safe with predictable results.
Copyright © 2012 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy; Complications; Orthognathic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23305697     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  7 in total

1.  Restorative complications of orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  A Alani; M Kelleher
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Effect of perioperative buccal fracture of the proximal segment on postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Sang-Yoon Lee; Hoon Joo Yang; Jeong-Joon Han; Soon Jung Hwang
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-10-22

3.  CBCT location of the fusion between the buccal and lingual cortical in the mandibular ramus: importance to sagittal split osteotomy.

Authors:  L Scomparin; M-Q-S Soares; C-M-F Rubira; R-Y-F Yaedú; T-S-N Imada; B-S Centurion; E-S Tolentino; J-R-P Lauris; I-R-F Rubira-Bullen
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-07-01

4.  Dal Pont vs Hunsuck: Which Technique Can Lead to a Lower Incidence of Bad Split during Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy? A Triple-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Farhad Zeynalzadeh; Zahra Shooshtari; Majid Eshghpour; Seied Hosein Hoseini Zarch; Elahe Tohidi; Sahand Samieirad
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09

5.  Intravenous ibuprofen versus diclofenac plus orphenadrine in orthognathic surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Josip Tomic; Jürgen Wallner; Irene Mischak; Gerald Sendlhofer; Wolfgang Zemann; Monika Schanbacher; Hamid Hassanzadeh; Andreas Sandner-Kiesling; Michael Payer; Tomislav A Zrnc
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Removal of Deeply Impacted Mandibular Molars by Sagittal Split Osteotomy.

Authors:  Erol Cansiz; Sabri Cemil Isler; B Alper Gultekin
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-06-27

Review 7.  Clinical Indications to Germectomy in Pediatric Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marta Mazur; Artnora Ndokaj; Beatrice Marasca; Gian Luca Sfasciotti; Roberto Marasca; Maurizio Bossù; Livia Ottolenghi; Antonella Polimeni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.