| Literature DB >> 23304524 |
Neeharika Srivastava1, Aishwarya Singh Chauhan, Bechan Sharma.
Abstract
The present study was designed to evaluate relative contribution of different polyphenols (total phenolics, flavonoids, flavonols) and their antioxidants activities in aqueous extracts of different parts of some plants; Argemone mexicana, Datura metel, Calotropis procera, Thevetia peruviana, and Cannabis sativa. The antioxidants (total phenolics, flavonoids, flavones) were determined by chemical methods. The antioxidant capacities of these extracts were evaluated by FRAP assay. The results demonstrated that phenolic content was maximally present in leaves of T. peruviana. This plant exhibited minimum phenolic content in its flower as compared to other plants. The flower of D. metel contained maximum phenolic content. The flavonoids were present in highest quantity in leaves of C. procera while T. peruviana flowers showed maximum flavonoid content. The fruits of C. sativa contained maximum quantity of flavonoid as compared to other plants tested. The flower extract of C. sativa possessed highest FRAP value followed by A. mexicana and fruit of C. procera. The values of ratios of different polyphenolic compounds present in plant extracts indicated that flower of D. metel contained maximum total flavonoids and minimum phenolics. These results suggested that levels of total phenolics, flavonoids and their FRAP indices exhibited specificity to different plants and their parts.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23304524 PMCID: PMC3529893 DOI: 10.1155/2012/549850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Res Int ISSN: 2090-3146
Figure 1Comparative estimates of the analysis of total phenolic content in different parts of A. mexiacana, D. metal, C. procera, T. peruviana, and C. sativa. The determination of phenolics has been done as described in Section 2. The results indicate average values of three independent experiments.
Figure 2Comparative estimates of the analysis of total flavonoid content in different parts of A. mexiacana, D. metal, C. procera, T. peruviana, and C. sativa. The determination of flavonoids has been done as described in Section 2. The results indicate average values of three independent experiments.
Total antioxidant activity of different plant preparations in terms of ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP).
| S. number | Name of the plant | Plant part used | Extract type | FRAP ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leaf | 33.6 ± 0.14 | ||
| 2 |
| Stem | 8.40 ± 0.14 | |
| 3 | Flower | 69.1 ± 0.28 | ||
| 4 | Fruit | 11.8 ± 0.07 | ||
| 5 | Leaf | 24.7 ± 1.13 | ||
| 6 |
| Stem | 9.60 ± 0.00 | |
| 7 | Flower | 21.3 ± 0.28 | ||
| 8 | Fruit | 23.1 ± 0.77 | ||
| 9 | Leaf | 38.7 ± 0.43 | ||
| 10 |
| Stem | Aqueous | 11.3 ± 0.77 |
| 11 | Flower | 24.5 ± 0.42 | ||
| 12 | Fruit | 41.3 ± 1.20 | ||
| 13 | Leaf | 15.8 ± 0.07 | ||
| 14 |
| Stem | 21.5 ± 0.70 | |
| 15 | Flower | 19.2 ± 0.21 | ||
| 16 | Fruit | 24.2 ± 0.31 | ||
| 17 | Leaf | 34.0 ± 0.02 | ||
| 18 |
| Stem | 14.5 ± 0.35 | |
| 19 | Flower | 74.8 ± 1.93 |
The FRAP values for different parts of the plants A. mexicana, D. metal, C. procera, T. peruviana and C. sativa have been determined as described in Section 2. The values are the average of three independent experiments.
Ratio of different polyphenolic compounds in the plant extracts (total flavonoids/total phenolics).
| S. number | Name of the plant | Plant parts used | Extract type | Ratio of polyphenolic compounds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Leaf | 0.331 | |
| 2 | Stem | 0.200 | ||
| 3 | Flower | 0.169 | ||
| 4 | Fruit | 0.324 | ||
| 5 |
| Leaf | 0.181 | |
| 6 | Stem | 0.500 | ||
| 7 | Flower | 0.750 | ||
| 8 | Fruit | 0.251 | ||
| 9 |
| Leaf | 0.234 | |
| 10 | Stem | Aqueous | 0.500 | |
| 11 | Flower | 0.222 | ||
| 12 | Fruit | 0.209 | ||
| 13 |
| Leaf | 0.018 | |
| 14 | Stem | 0.189 | ||
| 15 | Flower | 0.478 | ||
| 16 | Fruit | 0.253 | ||
| 17 |
| Leaf | 0.155 | |
| 18 | Stem | 0.260 | ||
| 19 | Flower | 0.129 |