| Literature DB >> 23304431 |
Akbar Hossain1, Jaime A Teixeira da Silva.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The most fundamental activity of the people of Bangladesh is agriculture. Modelling projections for Bangladesh indicate that warmer temperatures linked to climate change will severely reduce the growth of various winter crops (wheat, boro rice, potato and winter vegetables) in the north and central parts. In summer, crops in south-eastern parts of the country are at risk from increased flooding as sea levels increase. KEY FACTS: Wheat is one of the most important winter crops and is temperature sensitive and the second most important grain crop after rice. In this review, we provide an up-to-date and detailed account of wheat research of Bangladesh and the impact that global warming may have on agriculture, especially wheat production. Although flooding is not of major importance or consequence to the wheat crop at present, some perspectives are provided on this stress since wheat is flood sensitive and the incidence of flooding is likely to increase. PROJECTIONS: This information and projections will allow wheat breeders to devise new breeding programmes to attempt to mitigate future global warming. We discuss what this implies for food security in the broader context of South Asia.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23304431 PMCID: PMC3540706 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/pls042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Fig. 1Yearly import (1000 MT) and growth rate (%) of wheat from 1971 to 2011 in Bangladesh. Growth rate (%) was calculated relative to the previous year's value (data source: Index Mundi 2012).
Fig. 2Domestic consumption (1000 MT) and growth rate (%) of wheat from 1960 to 2011 in Bangladesh. Growth rate (%) was calculated relative to the previous year's value (data source: Index Mundi 2012).
Fig. 3Yearly production (1000 MT) and growth rate (%) of wheat from 1960 to 2011 in Bangladesh. Growth rate (%) was calculated relative to the previous year's value (data source: Index Mundi 2012).
Fig. 4Area cultivated (1000 ha) and growth rate (%) of wheat from 1960 to 2011 in Bangladesh. Growth rate (%) was calculated relative to the previous year's value (data source: Index Mundi 2012).
Characteristics of existing wheat varieties of Bangladesh developed since 1998 (BARI 2012).
| Variety | Stress tolerance capacity | Life duration (days) | Yield (kg ha−1) | Suitable area for cultivation | Year of release | Sowing time | Harvest time | Major diseases and pests |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sourav | Moderately heat tolerant | 102–110 | 3500–4500 | All over the country except saline areas | 1998 | Nov. 15–30 | Mar.–Apr. | Tolerant to |
| Gourab | Heat sensitive | 102–108 | 3500–4600 | All over the country except saline areas | 1998 | Nov. 15–30 | Mar.–Apr. | Tolerant to |
| Shatabdi | Good level of tolerance to terminal heat | 105–110 | 3600–5000 | All over the country except saline areas | 2000 | Nov. 15–30 | Mar.–Apr. | Highly tolerant to |
| Sufi | Tolerant to late heat stress | 105–110 | 3600–5000 | All over the country except saline areas | 2005 | Nov. 15–30 | Mar.–Apr. | Highly tolerant to |
| Bijoy | Moderately heat tolerant | 103–112 | 4300–5000 | All over the country except saline areas | 2005 | Nov. 15–30 | Mar.–Apr. | Highly tolerant to |
| Prodip | High yielding, but heat sensitive | 102–110 | 4300–5100 | All over the country except saline areas | 2005 | Nov. 15–30 | Mar.–Apr. | Highly tolerant to |
| BARI Gom 25 | Moderate level of tolerance to heat stress | 102–110 | 3600–5000 | Suitable for southern region (8–10 dS m−1 salinity level) | 2010 | Nov. 15–30 | Mar.–Apr. | Highly tolerant to |
| BARI Gom 26 | Tolerant to terminal heat stress in late seeding | 104–110 | 3500–5000 | Possible to grow throughout the country except in areas with salinity level >6 dS m−1 | 2010 | Nov. 15–30 | Mar.–Apr. | Tolerant to |
| BARI Gom 27 | Moderate level of tolerance to heat stress | 105–110 | 3800–5400 | All over the country except saline areas | 2012 | Nov. 15 | Mar.–Apr. | It is resistant to leaf rust and tolerant to |
| BARI Gom 28 | Tolerant to terminal heat stress in late seeding | 100–105 | 4000–5500 | All over the country except saline areas | 2012 | Nov. 15 | Mar.–Apr. | It is resistant to leaf rust and tolerant to |
Fig. 5Year of release and average yield (tons ha. Figures in the centre of the bars indicate the year of release, while those above the bars indicate average yield (tons ha−1). Bars in white indicate existing Bangladesh wheat varieties (i.e. bred in BARI) (data source: BARI 2012).
Fig. 6Beginning stock (▴ 1000 MT) for future security and growth rate (%) of wheat over the last 10 years (2002–2011) in Bangladesh. Bars indicate years from 2002 to 2011. The percentage values (±) in the bars indicate the growth rate relative to the previous year (data source: Index Mundi 2012).
Global and regional wheat production and consumption statistics in wheat-producing countries (FAOSTAT 2012).
| Subregion | Area (million ha) | Production (million tons) | Yield (kg ha−1) | Population (million) | Population earning <1$/day (%) | Population earning <2$/day (%) | Million people earning <2$/day (%) | Kcal/capita/day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern Asia | 23.9 | 110.4 | 4628 | 1406 | 16 | 45 | 634 | 597 |
| Southern Asia | 37.2 | 98.7 | 2656 | 1542 | 32 | 79 | 1212 | 481 |
| Central Asia | 16.1 | 26.4 | 1633 | 78 | 3 | 31 | 24 | 1279 |
| Middle East/North Africa | 26.8 | 61.6 | 2296 | 514 | 6 | 23 | 120 | 1154 |
| Eastern Africa | 1.7 | 2.9 | 1735 | 229 | 26 | 70 | 160 | 192 |
| Southern Africa | 0.9 | 2.3 | 2934 | 156 | 11 | 21 | 33 | 258 |
| Western Africa | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1478 | 184 | 69 | 90 | 165 | 135 |
| South America | 8.4 | 20.7 | 2464 | 385 | 9 | 24 | 92 | 430 |
| Central America | 0.7 | 3.6 | 5065 | 131 | 11 | 29 | 37 | 264 |
| North America | 30.2 | 82 | 2728 | 341 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 603 |
| Eastern Europe | 38.7 | 100 | 2587 | 295 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 963 |
| North and western Europe | 13.2 | 90.1 | 6820 | 287 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 701 |
| Southern Europe | 5.8 | 19.6 | 3364 | 154 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 836 |
| Australia/New Zealand | 12.6 | 15 | 1222 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 547 |
| Total | 216.2 | 634 | 2933 | 5727 | 18 | 43 | 2478 | 597 |
Recent studies related to heat, drought and low-temperature stress in different countries around the world (chronological order).
| Country | Tested cultivars | Main research findings | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Denmark | Tested 2255 Mexican wheat landraces | Landraces were evaluated on the basis of canopy temperature depression (LCC), and 1000-kernel weight. Three landrace cultivars with superior and consistent LCC values were identified. These accessions are potentially useful sources for improving heat tolerance in cultivated wheat. | |
| Australia | Wheat variety ‘Lyallpur’ | Despite favourable day/night temperature (18/13 °C), drought reduced kernel dry weight at anthesis. | |
| Sudan | Wheat variety ‘Debira’, ‘El Nelein’, ‘Donki’ | A 2-year field study in two regions showed that ‘El Nelein’ performed best when sown late (air temp. 17–24 °C). | |
| China | Spring wheat variety ‘Ningchun18’ | Soil water deficit both during the middle vegetative stage and the late reproductive stages and no-soil-water-deficit both during the late vegetative stage (booting) and the early reproductive stage (heading) had the highest yield increase of 25 and 14 %. | |
| Egypt | Wheat cultivars ‘Sakha8’, ‘Sakha93’, ‘Sakha61’, ‘Chinese spring’ | Based on drought susceptibility index ‘Sakha8'and ‘Sakha93’ were tolerant, and ‘Sakha61’ and ‘Chinese spring’ were susceptible. | |
| Turkey | 20 wheat cultivars (16 bread wheat, | Considering drought sensitivity indices over 2 years, the bread wheat cultivars ‘Yayla-305’, ‘Gerek-79’, ‘Dagdas-94’ and ‘Bolal-2973’ were more drought-tolerant than other cultivars. | |
| Argentina | Wheat, barley and Triticale | Wheat, barley and a Triticale cultivar were evaluated in three seasons under three thermal conditions: control and two heat conditions before anthesis. Stem elongation stage was most sensitive to high-temperature stress (yield reduction 46 %). | |
| Hungary | Wheat varieties ‘GK-Elet’, ‘Mv-Emese’ | Pot culture experiment in growth chamber indicated that ‘Mv-Emese’ had better drought stress tolerance than ‘GK-Elet’. | |
| Bulgaria | Two drought-tolerant (‘Katya’, ‘Zlatitza’) and two drought-sensitive wheat varieties (‘Sadovo’, ‘Miziya’) | Drought-tolerant varieties ‘Katya’ and ‘Zlatitza’ had higher levels of these proteins, especially rubisco binding protein (RBP) and ATP-dependent calpain protease (Clp) proteins. | |
| USA | Spring wheat variety ‘Sinton’ | Cool air temperature (18.33 °C) lengthened the lifespan and high temperature (26.11 °C) shortened the lifespan. | |
| Portugal | Four | Under heat stress (day/night 31/20 °C) during the grain-filling period, Fe and Mn helped to overcome stress. | |
| Iran | Wheat cultivars ‘Azar-2’, ‘Sardari’, ‘Frankia’, ‘Trakia’ | ‘Frankia’ performed better in various levels of terminal drought stress. | |
| Azerbaijan | Two bread wheat (‘Giymatli-2/17’, ‘Azamatli-95’) and two durum wheat variety (‘Garagylchyg-2’, ‘Barakatli-95’) | In drought-tolerant genotypes ‘Azamatli-95’ and ‘Barakatli-95’ this decrease was less pronounced than drought-sensitive ‘Garagylchyg-2’ and ‘Giymatli-2/17’. | |
| Pakistan | Four wheat genotypes viz., ‘LU-26s’, ‘Bhittai’, ‘Roshan’, ‘Taifu’ | ‘LU-26s’ performed best in drought, with minimum decrease in the growth parameters i.e. plant height, number of tillers and shoot biomass. | |
| Syria | Five genotypes | Late and very-late planting reduced yield traits significantly. Varieties were ranked based on tolerance to high-temperature stress: PBW 343 (susceptible) PBW 175 and HD 2865 (moderately susceptible) and HDR-77 and HD 2815 (tolerant). | |
| Pakistan | Five wheat varieties (‘TJ-83’, ‘Imdad-2005’, ‘Abadgar-93’, ‘Moomal-2000’, ‘Mehran-89’) | ‘Moomal-2000’ and ‘Mehran-89’ (better performed under 20–30 °C air temperature = heat stress). ‘TJ-83’, ‘Imdad-2005’ and ‘Abadgar-93’ were heat-sensitive. | |
| Saudi Arabia | Three wheat genotypes (‘KSU-105’, ‘KSU-106’, ‘Yecora Roja’) | ‘KSU-105’ performed better in late heat stress condition (25–30 °C). ‘KSU-106’ and ‘Yecora Roja' were heat-sensitive. | |
| Russia | Eight wheat genotypes | ‘Zlata’ showed sensitivity to low air temperature (−3 °C) and ‘Ester’ and Yubileinaya' showed tolerance to low temperature (−3 °C). | |
| Ethiopia | 18 wheat genotypes ‘B5-5B’, ‘S-17B’, and ‘WA-13’,‘Asassa, Bekelcha’, ‘Boohai, Egersa’, ‘Foka, Gerardo’, ‘Ilani, T Kilinto’, ‘Obsa, Oda’, ‘Quamy’, ‘Tob-66’, Yeror’, ‘CDSS93Y107’ ‘CD94523’ | Water deficit significantly affected gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. It reduced the net photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance measured both at anthesis and grain-filling stages. | |
| India | Wheat genotypes ‘HD2851, ‘HI8498’, ‘HDR77’, ‘PBW343’ and ‘HD2936’ | Low temperature (<18–20 °C air temperature) during reproductive stage causes sterility of pollen grains. ‘HD2851, ‘HI8498'and ‘HDR77’ were highly affected by low temperature (<15 °C). Two other cultivars ‘PBW343’ and ‘HD2936’ were tolerant to low temperature (11.6–15 °C). | |
| United Kingdom | Wheat genotypes ‘Damani’, ‘Gomal-8’, ‘Hashim-8’, ‘DN-73’, ‘Zam-04’, ‘Dera-98’ | ‘Hashim-8’ was drought tolerant. | |
| Jordan | 15 wheat genotypes: ‘Omguer-5’, ‘Genil-3’, ‘Stork’, ‘Korifla’, ‘Omrabi-5’, ‘Waha-1’, ‘Stojocri-3’, ‘Massara-1’, ‘Omsnima-1’, ‘Lagost-3’, ‘Heina’, ‘Ombar’, ‘Gersabil-2’, ‘Moulsabil-2’, and ‘Zeina-3’) | ‘Waha-1’, ‘Omrabi-5’, and ‘Massara-1’ genotypes performed better in Mediterranean climate among genotypes studied. | |
| Russia | 4 spring wheat (‘Zernagrad. 770’, ‘Sokol’, ‘Ratnik’, ‘Nutans’) and 2 barley (‘Saratov. 70’, ‘line 4’) | Among the 6 genotypes (wheat + barley) ‘Zernagrad. 770’ and ‘line 4’ were found to be stress tolerant (high temperature with drought). |
General circulation model estimates of temperature and precipitation changes (source: OECD 2003).
| Year | Temperature change (°C) mean | Precipitation change (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual | DJF | JJA | Annual | DJF | JJA | |
| Baseline average | 2278 mm | 33.7 mm | 1343.7 mm | |||
| 2030 | 1.0 (0.11) | 1.1 (0.18) | 0.8 (0.16) | +3.8 (2.30) | −1.2 (12.56) | +4.7 (3.7) |
| 2050 | 1.4 (0.16) | 1.6 (0.26) | 1.1 (0.23) | +5.6 (3.33) | −1.7 (18.15) | +6.8 (4.58) |
| 2100 | 2.4 (0.28) | 2.7 (0.46) | 1.9 (0.40) | +9.7 (5.8) | −3.0 (31.60) | +11.8 (7.97) |
Figures in parenthesis indicate standard deviation.
DJE, December, January and February; JJA, June, July and August.
Research findings related to the effect of temperature on wheat (T. aestivum L.) of Bangladesh studied by different scientists.
| Types of research | Research findings | References |
|---|---|---|
| Effect of seeding time and spacing on yield of wheat under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions | Seeding of wheat should start first week of November and continue up to end of December. | |
| Effect of seeding dates on the yield and maturity of spring wheat | High temperature at the reproductive phase and low temperature at the early vegetative phase of wheat resulted in reduced number of days for attaining different phenological stages. | |
| Influence of sowing dates and seed rate on two varieties of wheat | High temperature during tillering stage reduced tillers, resulted in low yield. | |
| Effect of dates of sowing and rate of fertilizers on yield of wheat under irrigated conditions | Late sown wheat affected by temperature twice: at germination stage and at reproductive stage. | |
| Performance of some modern cultivars of wheat under different dates of planting | Delayed sowing reduced yield due to high-temperature stress at the grain-filling stage. | |
| Drought stress effects on water relations of wheat | Drought stress significantly decreased the leaf water potential and relative water content of wheat, which had pronounced effects on photosynthetic rate. | |
| Drought stress effect on photosynthetic rate and leaf gas exchange of wheat | In drought, photosynthetic rates decreased with a decrease in stomatal conductance. Tolerant varieties were less affected than sensitive ones. | |
| Water-logging tolerance | Water logging is a widespread problem in irrigated and high rainfall wheat-growing regions of the world like Bangladesh. | |
| Kernel growth physiology of wheat under late planting heat stress | Reduced kernel size in heat-sensitive genotypes due to reduction in rapid kernel growth and duration. | |
| Spikelet sterility of wheat in farmer's field in northwest Bangladesh. | When sown 7 days earlier, wheat crops had more spikelet sterility than when sown 7 days later. | |
| Effect of sowing dates on yield of wheat varieties and lines developed since 1998 | Existing varieties may be sown November 15 to December 6 for good yield (3.5 tons ha−1). | |
| Sowing dates mediated heat stress affects the leaf growth and dry matter partitioning in some spring wheat cultivars | It was clearly observed that high temperature caused a devastating effect on the leaf growth, dry matter partitioning and grain yield of wheat. | |
| Building yield in Bangladesh wheat crops: experience from traditional wheat-producing regions. | They identified that north region wheat get more time (105–110 days) to anthesis, due to long duration low temperature at winter (yield 4 tons ha−1). On the other hand, south region wheat needs 90–95 days to anthesis (yield 3 tons ha−1), due to high temperature in winter than north. | |
| Resistance to rusts in Bangladeshi wheat | Considering on genetic basis, advance line ‘Francolin#1’ and the new variety ‘BARI Gom 26’ were found to be Ug99 | |
| Farmers' preference and informal seed dissemination of first Ug99-tolerant wheat variety in Bangladesh | ‘BAW1064’ (‘BARI Gom 26’) was more tolerant to rust Ug99 than other tested genotypes. | |
| Evaluation of spring wheat under heat stress: I. Phenology, II. Growth and development | Due to high-temperature stress the stages of life cycle reduce their duration or length, which ultimately affected growth and development, finally yield. | |
| The effect of high-temperature stress on the phenology, growth and yield of five wheat genotypes | All the wheat genotypes where highly affected by high-temperature stress at late sown condition. Among these BARI Gom 26 were heat tolerant than others. | |
| Yield, protein and starch content of 20 wheat genotypes exposed to high temperature under late sowing conditions | Due to the high-temperature stress, yield and yield-related components, protein and starch contain of late-sown wheat were significantly affected. |
Research related to membrane thermostability, heat susceptibility, relative performance and stress stability study to identify heat-tolerant cultivars.
| Wheat cultivars | Heat-tolerant cultivars | Susceptible cultivars | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 wheat varieties (‘Kalyansona/Mexi Pak’, ‘Sonora 64’, ‘INIA 66’, ‘Norteno 67’, ‘Sonalika’, ‘Nuri 70’, ‘Jupateco 73’, ‘Tonori 71’, ‘Balaka’, ‘Doel’, ‘Pavon 76’, ‘Ananda (BAW 18)’, ‘Kanchan (BAW 28)’, ‘Akbar (BAW 43)’, ‘Barkat (BAW 39)’, ‘Aghrani (BAW 38)’ and two advance lines (‘BAW 171’, BAW 452’) | ‘Kanchan’ and two advanced lines ‘BAW 171’ and ‘BAW 452’ were high-yielding and matured early. | Other cultivars showed sensitivity to high temperature when sown late. | |
| Sonilika’, ‘Balaka’, ‘Ananda’, ‘Kanchan’, ‘Akbar’, ‘Barkat’ | ‘Kanchan’ performed best in all sowing conditions. | Other cultivars showed sensitivity to high temperature (28–32 °C). | |
| ‘Ananda’, ‘Pavon’, ‘Aghrani’, ‘Barkat’, ‘Akbar’, ‘Kanchan’, ‘Protiva’, ‘Balaka’, ‘Sawgat’, ‘Sonora’ | Based on a membrane thermo-stability test, ‘Ananda’, ‘Pavon’, ‘Aghrani’ and ‘Barkat’ were classified as relatively heat tolerant while ‘Akbar’, ‘Kanchan’ and ‘Protiva’ were moderately tolerant. | The remaining three varieties ‘Balaka’, ‘Sawgat’ and ‘Sonora’ had the shortest heat killing time and were considered to be heat sensitive. | |
| Two wheat cultivars: ‘Kanchon’, ‘Sonora’ | Based on membrane thermo-stability and contribution of pre-anthesis reserves. | ‘Kanchan’ was considered to be relatively heat tolerant and ‘Sonora’ as heat sensitive. | |
| ‘Agrani’, ‘Kanchan’, ‘CB-30’, ‘Sonora’ | Based on praline content, membrane thermo-stability and heat susceptibility index, ‘Agrani’, ‘Kanchan’ and ‘CB-30’ were heat tolerant. | ‘Sonora’ was heat sensitive. | |
| 10 wheat genotypes (‘Kanchan’, ‘BAW-969’, ‘SW89-5124*21FASAN’, ‘W 82/VEE/KOEL 1 3/PEG//MLR/BUC’, ‘HP/ 1731, SERI/ RAYON’, ‘LAJ 3302/2* M088’, ‘BORL 95/ LAJ 3302’, ‘OASS/SKAUZ// 4*BCN’ and ‘SCAN’) | Based on relative performance and heat susceptibility index MW-8, BW-4 and BW-3. | Other 7 cvs. were heat susceptible. | |
| ‘Agrani’, ‘Prodip’, ‘Bijoy’, ‘CB 69’, ‘Sourav’, ‘Sufi’, ‘BAW 1064’, ‘Gourab’, ‘Kanchan’, ‘Shatabdi’, ‘CB 30’, ‘Sonora’, ‘CB 24’, ‘CB34’, ‘Protiva’ | Based on cell membrane thermo-stability, photosynthates stem reserve translocation, ‘Agra, ‘Kanchan’, ‘CB 30’ and ‘CB 69’ were found as heat-tolerant genotypes for cultivation in Patuakhali district. | ‘Sonora’, ‘CB 34’, ‘CB 24’ and ‘Protiva’ were heat-sensitive genotypes and remaining seven were heat susceptible. | |
| ‘Gourab’, ‘Sourav’, ‘Kanchan’, ‘Shatabdi’, ‘Sonora’, ‘Kalyansona’ | Based on the growing degree days, helio-thermal unit, heat use efficiency and pheno-thermal index, ‘Gourab’, ‘Sourav’, ‘Kanchan’ and ‘Shatabdi’ performed better in heat stress. | Heat-sensitive cultivars, Sonora and ‘Kalyansona’ showed sensitivity to heat stress. | |
| 10 spring wheat genotypes ‘Gen/3/Gov’, ‘PB81/PVN’, ‘Fang 60’, ‘Kanchan’, ‘Sari 82’, ‘HI 977’, ‘HAR 424’ ‘PF 70354’, ‘Opata’, ‘Fyn/Pvn’ | Considering canopy temperature depression, ‘Gen/3/Gov’ seemed to be the best entry for late planting with reasonably high yield, moderate grain size and growth period. | Other varieties did not show better performance in late heat stress. | M. A. Rahman |
| ‘Sourav’, ‘Gourab’, ‘Shatabdi’, ‘Sufi’, ‘Bijoy’, ‘Prodip’, ‘BAW 1059’, ‘BAW 1064’ | According to stability analysis ‘Sourav’ was a stable variety in all environmental conditions. | ‘Prodip’ and ‘BAW1064’ were sensitive genotypes. | |
| ‘Gourab’, ‘Sourav’, ‘Kanchan’, ‘Shatabdi’, ‘Sonora’, ‘Kalyansona’ | Based on membrane thermo-stability in a laboratory test, then canopy temperature depression and stem reserve mobilization capacity, ‘Shatabdi’, ‘Sourav’, ‘Kanchan’ and ‘Gourab’ were grouped as heat tolerant. | Whereas cultivars ‘Sonora’ and ‘Kalyansona’ were considered as heat sensitive. | |
| 20 wheat genotypes | Based on the % cell membrane injury and seedling proline content ‘Bijoy’, ‘Sufi’, ‘Kanchan’, ‘Fang 60’, ‘BAW 1059’, ‘BL 1883’, ‘BL 1022’, ‘IVT 7’, ‘IVT 8’, ‘IVT 9’, ‘IVT 10’ and ‘BAW 917’ were heat-tolerant (). | Remaining 8 genotypes were heat sensitive. | |
| ‘Sourav’, ‘Gourab’, ‘Shatabdi’, ‘Sufi’, ‘Bijoy’, ‘Prodip’, ‘BARI Gom 25’, ‘BARI Gom 26’ | Both in too early and very late heat stress conditions, genotypes ‘Sourav’ and ‘BARI Gom 25’ were heat tolerant. | Variety ‘Prodip’ showed sensitivity to high temperature. | |
| ‘Gourab’, ‘BARI Gom 25’ and ‘BARI Gom 26’ | Considering on heat susceptibility and relative performance, variety ‘BARI Gom 25’ was the best-performing variety, followed by ‘BARI Gom 26’ | ‘Gourab’ was susceptible variety. |
Postulated rust resistance genes in the released wheat varieties of Bangladesh (source: Malaker and Reza 2011).
| Variety | Year of release | Postulated rust resistance genes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kanchan | 1983 | Ra | – | |
| Akbar | 1983 | – | – | |
| Ananda | 1983 | – | – | |
| Barkat | 1983 | – | ||
| Aghrani | 1987 | – | – | |
| Protiva | 1993 | – | – | |
| Sourav | 1998 | |||
| Gourab | 1998 | |||
| Shatabdi | 2000 | |||
| Sufi | 2005 | |||
| Bijoy | 2005 | R | ||
| Prodip | 2005 | |||
| BARI Gom 25 | 2010 | R | ||
| BARI Gom 26 | 2010 | – | ||
| BARI Gom 27d | 2012 | – | – | |
| BARI Gom 28d | 2012 | – | – | – |
R, resistant; APR, adult plant resistance.
aResistant to all Indian pathotypes of stem rust.
bGenes were not postulated.
cLeaf tip necrosis gene Lr34.
dRust resistance genes present in these two varieties have not yet been identified (may have been detected in the source countries, but we do not have the information); presence of Sr2 (adult plant slow rusting stem rust resistance gene) in BARI Gom 27 is to be confirmed.