Literature DB >> 23304420

Quantifying surgical complexity through textual descriptions of current procedural terminology codes.

Alexander Van Esbroeck1, Ilan Rubinfeld, Zeeshan Syed.   

Abstract

Models for surgical complications are a requirement for evaluating patients by the bedside or for risk-adjusted quality and outcomes assessment of healthcare providers. Developing such models requires quantifying the complexities of surgical procedures. Existing approaches to quantify procedural complexity rely on coding system generalities or factors designed for reimbursement. These approaches measure complexity of surgical procedures through the time taken for the procedures or their correspondence to rough anatomical ranges. We address this limitation through a novel approach that provides a fine-grained estimate of individual procedural complexity by studying textual descriptions of current procedure terminology (CPT) codes associated with these procedures. We show that such an approach can provide superior assessment of procedural complexity when compared to currently used estimates. This text-based score can improve surgical risk adjustment even after accounting for a large array of patient factors, indicating the potential to improve quality assessment of surgical care providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23304420      PMCID: PMC3540560     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  7 in total

1.  Interpretation of the C-statistic in the context of ACS-NSQIP models.

Authors:  Ryan P Merkow; Karl Y Bilimoria; Bruce L Hall
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Assessing new biomarkers and predictive models for use in clinical practice: a clinician's guide.

Authors:  Kevin McGeechan; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Gerald Liew; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-24

5.  The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; J Demakis; J B Aust; V Chong; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G Irvin; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Improving American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk adjustment: incorporation of a novel procedure risk score.

Authors:  Mehul V Raval; Mark E Cohen; Angela M Ingraham; Justin B Dimick; Nicholas H Osborne; Barton H Hamilton; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce L Hall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 6.113

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.