BACKGROUND: Because pneumococcal pneumonia was prevalent during previous influenza pandemics, we evaluated invasive pneumococcal pneumonia (IPP) rates during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic. METHODS: We identified laboratory-confirmed, influenza-associated hospitalizations and IPP cases (pneumococcus isolated from normally sterile sites with discharge diagnoses of pneumonia) using active, population-based surveillance in the United States. We compared IPP rates during peak pandemic months (April 2009-March 2010) to mean IPP rates in nonpandemic years (April 2004-March 2009) and, using Poisson models, to 2006-2008 influenza seasons. RESULTS: Higher IPP rates occurred during the peak pandemic month compared to nonpandemic periods in 5-24 (IPP rate per 10 million: 48 vs 9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5-13), 25-49 (74 vs 53 [CI, 41-65]), 50-64 (188 vs 114 [CI, 85-143]), and ≥65-year-olds (229 vs 187 [CI, 159-216]). In the models with seasonal influenza rates included, observed IPP rates during the pandemic peak were within the predicted 95% CIs, suggesting this increase was not greater than observed with seasonal influenza. CONCLUSIONS: The recent influenza pandemic likely resulted in an out-of-season IPP peak among persons ≥5 years. The IPP peak's magnitude was similar to that seen during seasonal influenza epidemics.
BACKGROUND: Because pneumococcal pneumonia was prevalent during previous influenza pandemics, we evaluated invasive pneumococcal pneumonia (IPP) rates during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic. METHODS: We identified laboratory-confirmed, influenza-associated hospitalizations and IPP cases (pneumococcus isolated from normally sterile sites with discharge diagnoses of pneumonia) using active, population-based surveillance in the United States. We compared IPP rates during peak pandemic months (April 2009-March 2010) to mean IPP rates in nonpandemic years (April 2004-March 2009) and, using Poisson models, to 2006-2008 influenza seasons. RESULTS: Higher IPP rates occurred during the peak pandemic month compared to nonpandemic periods in 5-24 (IPP rate per 10 million: 48 vs 9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5-13), 25-49 (74 vs 53 [CI, 41-65]), 50-64 (188 vs 114 [CI, 85-143]), and ≥65-year-olds (229 vs 187 [CI, 159-216]). In the models with seasonal influenza rates included, observed IPP rates during the pandemic peak were within the predicted 95% CIs, suggesting this increase was not greater than observed with seasonal influenza. CONCLUSIONS: The recent influenza pandemic likely resulted in an out-of-season IPP peak among persons ≥5 years. The IPP peak's magnitude was similar to that seen during seasonal influenza epidemics.
Authors: Prashant Rai; Marcus Parrish; Ian Jun Jie Tay; Na Li; Shelley Ackerman; Fang He; Jimmy Kwang; Vincent T Chow; Bevin P Engelward Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tasnee Chonmaitree; Rocio Trujillo; Kristofer Jennings; Pedro Alvarez-Fernandez; Janak A Patel; Michael J Loeffelholz; Johanna Nokso-Koivisto; Reuben Matalon; Richard B Pyles; Aaron L Miller; David P McCormick Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Wesley H Self; Marie R Griffin; Yuwei Zhu; William D Dupont; Tyler W Barrett; Carlos G Grijalva Journal: J Infect Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 6.072
Authors: Eric J Chow; Melissa A Rolfes; Ruth L Carrico; Stephen Furmanek; Julio A Ramirez; Jill M Ferdinands; Alicia M Fry; Manish M Patel Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 3.835