Literature DB >> 23303525

Why collaborate with children in health research: an analysis of the risks and benefits of collaboration with children.

Deborah Bird1, Lorraine Culley, Monica Lakhanpaul.   

Abstract

Involvement of service users in decision making, in both clinical and research settings, has become a central feature of many health and research funding policies in the last 15 years. Over the same timeframe, there has been an increasing focus on children's rights, promoted by the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child, which gives children a right to be involved in decisions that affect their lives. In a research setting, this has resulted in increased engagement of children in research, as opposed to relying on parents or carers to represent their children, and a shift from research on children to research with children. In this article, we discuss collaboration with children under the age of 16 years in health research: what this means and why (or why not) to do it. The definition of collaboration is discussed and the lines among collaboration, involvement, participation and participatory research considered. The risks and benefits of collaboration are reviewed, both theoretical and evidence based, where evidence exists. The review ends with a look towards the future including the need for agreed definitions, better reporting of collaboration and other patient and public involvement activities with children to build up the much needed evidence base, the need for cost-benefit evaluations and, most importantly, the need for careful consideration as to whether collaborating with children is appropriate in each circumstance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23303525     DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed        ISSN: 1743-0585            Impact factor:   1.309


  19 in total

Review 1.  Participatory methods in pediatric participatory research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hanneke A Haijes; Ghislaine J M W van Thiel
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Challenges and opportunities of remote public involvement and community engagement during a pandemic: refining the MapMe childhood healthy weight intervention.

Authors:  L McSweeney; B Arnott; A Jones; G Cain; J Jenkins; A Andras; A Adamson
Journal:  Perspect Public Health       Date:  2022-06-29

3.  Using a co-production prioritization exercise involving South Asian children, young people and their families to identify health priorities requiring further research and public awareness.

Authors:  Logan Manikam; Rakhee Shah; Kate Reed; Gupreet Santini; Monica Lakhanpaul
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Patient and public involvement in Paediatric Intensive Care research: considerations, challenges and facilitating factors.

Authors:  J C Menzies; K P Morris; H P Duncan; J F Marriott
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2016-11-07

Review 5.  Dutch juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients, carers and clinicians create a research agenda together following the James Lind Alliance method: a study protocol.

Authors:  Casper G Schoemaker; Wineke Armbrust; Joost F Swart; Sebastiaan J Vastert; Jorg van Loosdregt; Anouk Verwoerd; Caroline Whiting; Katherine Cowan; Wendy Olsder; Els Versluis; Rens van Vliet; Marlous J Fernhout; Sanne L Bookelman; Jeannette Cappon; J Merlijn van den Berg; Ellen Schatorjé; Petra C E Hissink Muller; Sylvia Kamphuis; Joke de Boer; Otto T H M Lelieveld; Janjaap van der Net; Karin R Jongsma; Annemiek van Rensen; Christine Dedding; Nico M Wulffraat
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.054

6.  'A group of totally awesome people who do stuff' - a qualitative descriptive study of a children and young people's patient and public involvement endeavour.

Authors:  Faye Forsyth; Caroline Saunders; Anne Elmer; Shirlene Badger
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2019-03-12

7.  Back to school: challenges and rewards of engaging young children in scientific research.

Authors:  Janet Stocks; Sooky Lum
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Study protocol: Determining what young people with rheumatic disease consider important to research (the Young People's Opinions Underpinning Rheumatology Research - YOURR project).

Authors:  Suzanne Parsons; Kate Dack; Bella Starling; Wendy Thomson; Janet E McDonagh
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2016-06-11

9.  The impact of active research involvement of young children in the design of a new stereotest.

Authors:  Therese Casanova; Carla Black; Sheima Rafiq; Jessica Hugill-Jones; Jenny C A Read; Kathleen Vancleef
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2020-06-06

10.  'I actually felt like I was a researcher myself.' On involving children in the analysis of qualitative paediatric research in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Malou L Luchtenberg; Els L M Maeckelberghe; Aa Eduard Verhagen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.