Literature DB >> 23303507

SIBER: systematic identification of bimodally expressed genes using RNAseq data.

Pan Tong1, Yong Chen, Xiao Su, Kevin R Coombes.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Identification of bimodally expressed genes is an important task, as genes with bimodal expression play important roles in cell differentiation, signalling and disease progression. Several useful algorithms have been developed to identify bimodal genes from microarray data. Currently, no method can deal with data from next-generation sequencing, which is emerging as a replacement technology for microarrays.
RESULTS: We present SIBER (systematic identification of bimodally expressed genes using RNAseq data) for effectively identifying bimodally expressed genes from next-generation RNAseq data. We evaluate several candidate methods for modelling RNAseq count data and compare their performance in identifying bimodal genes through both simulation and real data analysis. We show that the lognormal mixture model performs best in terms of power and robustness under various scenarios. We also compare our method with alternative approaches, including profile analysis using clustering and kurtosis (PACK) and cancer outlier profile analysis (COPA). Our method is robust, powerful, invariant to shifting and scaling, has no blind spots and has a sample-size-free interpretation. AVAILABILITY: The R package SIBER is available at the website http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/main/OOMPA:Overview.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23303507      PMCID: PMC3582265          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  24 in total

Review 1.  Binary and graded responses in gene networks.

Authors:  Matthieu Louis; Attila Becskei
Journal:  Sci STKE       Date:  2002-07-30

2.  RNA-seq: an assessment of technical reproducibility and comparison with gene expression arrays.

Authors:  John C Marioni; Christopher E Mason; Shrikant M Mane; Matthew Stephens; Yoav Gilad
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq.

Authors:  Ali Mortazavi; Brian A Williams; Kenneth McCue; Lorian Schaeffer; Barbara Wold
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Stem cell transcriptome profiling via massive-scale mRNA sequencing.

Authors:  Nicole Cloonan; Alistair R R Forrest; Gabriel Kolle; Brooke B A Gardiner; Geoffrey J Faulkner; Mellissa K Brown; Darrin F Taylor; Anita L Steptoe; Shivangi Wani; Graeme Bethel; Alan J Robertson; Andrew C Perkins; Stephen J Bruce; Clarence C Lee; Swati S Ranade; Heather E Peckham; Jonathan M Manning; Kevin J McKernan; Sean M Grimmond
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Comparison of scores for bimodality of gene expression distributions and genome-wide evaluation of the prognostic relevance of high-scoring genes.

Authors:  Birte Hellwig; Jan G Hengstler; Marcus Schmidt; Mathias C Gehrmann; Wiebke Schormann; Jörg Rahnenführer
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  A two-parameter generalized Poisson model to improve the analysis of RNA-seq data.

Authors:  Sudeep Srivastava; Liang Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Detecting differential usage of exons from RNA-seq data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Alejandro Reyes; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Differential expression analysis for sequence count data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.

Authors:  Mark D Robinson; Davis J McCarthy; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  An immune response gene expression module identifies a good prognosis subtype in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrew E Teschendorff; Ahmad Miremadi; Sarah E Pinder; Ian O Ellis; Carlos Caldas
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  11 in total

1.  Multiplatform single-sample estimates of transcriptional activation.

Authors:  Stephen R Piccolo; Michelle R Withers; Owen E Francis; Andrea H Bild; W Evan Johnson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  HNF1B Loss Exacerbates the Development of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinomas.

Authors:  Mianen Sun; Pan Tong; Wen Kong; Baijun Dong; Yiran Huang; In Young Park; Lijun Zhou; Xian-De Liu; Zhiyong Ding; Xuesong Zhang; Shanshan Bai; Peter German; Reid Powell; Quan Wang; Xuefei Tong; Nizar M Tannir; Surena F Matin; W Kimryn Rathmell; Gregory N Fuller; Ian E McCutcheon; Cheryl L Walker; Jing Wang; Eric Jonasch
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  The most informative spacing test effectively discovers biologically relevant outliers or multiple modes in expression.

Authors:  Iwona Pawlikowska; Gang Wu; Michael Edmonson; Zhifa Liu; Tanja Gruber; Jinghui Zhang; Stan Pounds
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Complex Sources of Variation in Tissue Expression Data: Analysis of the GTEx Lung Transcriptome.

Authors:  Matthew N McCall; Peter B Illei; Marc K Halushka
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  CHK1 Inhibition in Small-Cell Lung Cancer Produces Single-Agent Activity in Biomarker-Defined Disease Subsets and Combination Activity with Cisplatin or Olaparib.

Authors:  Triparna Sen; Pan Tong; C Allison Stewart; Sandra Cristea; Aly Valliani; David S Shames; Abena B Redwood; You Hong Fan; Lerong Li; Bonnie S Glisson; John D Minna; Julien Sage; Don L Gibbons; Helen Piwnica-Worms; John V Heymach; Jing Wang; Lauren Averett Byers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Genome-wide cross-cancer analysis illustrates the critical role of bimodal miRNA in patient survival and drug responses to PI3K inhibitors.

Authors:  Laura Moody; Guanying Bianca Xu; Yuan-Xiang Pan; Hong Chen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.779

7.  SigFuge: single gene clustering of RNA-seq reveals differential isoform usage among cancer samples.

Authors:  Patrick K Kimes; Christopher R Cabanski; Matthew D Wilkerson; Ni Zhao; Amy R Johnson; Charles M Perou; Liza Makowski; Christopher A Maher; Yufeng Liu; J S Marron; D Neil Hayes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Single-cell analyses reveal increased intratumoral heterogeneity after the onset of therapy resistance in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C Allison Stewart; Carl M Gay; Yuanxin Xi; Santhosh Sivajothi; V Sivakamasundari; Junya Fujimoto; Mohan Bolisetty; Patrice M Hartsfield; Veerakumar Balasubramaniyan; Milind D Chalishazar; Cesar Moran; Neda Kalhor; John Stewart; Hai Tran; Stephen G Swisher; Jack A Roth; Jianjun Zhang; John de Groot; Bonnie Glisson; Trudy G Oliver; John V Heymach; Ignacio Wistuba; Paul Robson; Jing Wang; Lauren Averett Byers
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2020-02-17

9.  In-silico interaction-resolution pathway activity quantification and application to identifying cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Sungwon Jung
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Selecting Reliable mRNA Expression Measurements Across Platforms Improves Downstream Analysis.

Authors:  Pan Tong; Lixia Diao; Li Shen; Lerong Li; John Victor Heymach; Luc Girard; John D Minna; Kevin R Coombes; Lauren Averett Byers; Jing Wang
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2016-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.