Literature DB >> 23303353

Sex differences in cardiovascular outcomes in patients with incident hypertension.

Stacie L Daugherty1, Frederick A Masoudi, Chan Zeng, P Michael Ho, Karen L Margolis, Patrick J O'Connor, Alan S Go, David J Magid.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The time of initial hypertension diagnosis represents an opportunity to assess subsequent risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The extent to which women and men with newly identified hypertension are at a similar risk for adverse cardiovascular events, including chronic kidney disease (CKD), is not well known.
METHODS: Among women and men with incident hypertension from 2001 to 2006 enrolled in the Cardiovascular Research Network (CVRN) Hypertension Registry, we compared incident events including all-cause death; hospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure or stroke; and the development of CKD. Multivariable models were adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics.
RESULTS: Among 177,521 patients with incident hypertension, 55% were women. Compared with men, women were older, more likely white and had more kidney disease at baseline. Over median 3.2 years (interquartile range 1.6-4.8) of follow-up, after adjustment, women were equally likely to be hospitalized for heart failure [hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.07] and were significantly less likely to die of any cause (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.80-0.90) or be hospitalized for MI (hazard ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.39-0.50) or stroke (hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.60-0.77) compared with men. Women were significantly more likely to develop CKD (9.60 vs. 7.15%; adjusted hazard ratio 1.17, 95% CI 1.12-1.22) than men.
CONCLUSION: In this cohort with incident hypertension, women were more likely to develop CKD and less likely to develop other cardiovascular outcomes compared with men. Future studies should investigate the potential reasons for these sex differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23303353      PMCID: PMC3686286          DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835bdc44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  32 in total

1.  Evaluating hypertension control in a managed care setting.

Authors:  M Alexander; I Tekawa; E Hunkeler; B Fireman; R Rowell; J V Selby; B M Massie; W Cooper
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999 Dec 13-27

Review 2.  Predicting initiation and progression of chronic kidney disease: Developing renal risk scores.

Authors:  M W Taal; B M Brenner
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Effect of antihypertensive drug treatment on cardiovascular outcomes in women and men. A meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized, controlled trials. The INDANA Investigators.

Authors:  F Gueyffier; F Boutitie; J P Boissel; S Pocock; J Coope; J Cutler; T Ekbom; R Fagard; L Friedman; M Perry; R Prineas; E Schron
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Relationship between blood pressure and incident chronic kidney disease in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Rebecca Hanratty; Michel Chonchol; Edward P Havranek; J David Powers; L Miriam Dickinson; P Michael Ho; David J Magid; John F Steiner
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in 9357 subjects from 11 populations highlights missed opportunities for cardiovascular prevention in women.

Authors:  José Boggia; Lutgarde Thijs; Tine W Hansen; Yan Li; Masahiro Kikuya; Kristina Björklund-Bodegård; Tom Richart; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Jørgen Jeppesen; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Eamon Dolan; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Agnieszka Olszanecka; Valérie Tikhonoff; Sofia Malyutina; Edoardo Casiglia; Yuri Nikitin; Lars Lind; Gladys Maestre; Edgardo Sandoya; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Yutaka Imai; Jiguang Wang; Hans Ibsen; Eoin O'Brien; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Effect of gender on the progression of nondiabetic renal disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joel Neugarten; Anjali Acharya; Sharon R Silbiger
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Age-dependent gender differences in hypertension management.

Authors:  Stacie L Daugherty; Frederick A Masoudi; Jennifer L Ellis; P Michael Ho; Julie A Schmittdiel; Heather M Tavel; Joe V Selby; Patrick J O'Connor; Karen L Margolis; David J Magid
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  The rate of progression of renal disease may not be slower in women compared with men: a patient-level meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tazeen H Jafar; Christopher H Schmid; Paul C Stark; Robert Toto; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Piero Ruggenenti; Carmelita Marcantoni; Gavin Becker; Shahnaz Shahinfar; Paul E De Jong; Dick De Zeeuw; Anne-Lise Kamper; Svend Strangaard; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Prognostic value of serum creatinine and effect of treatment of hypertension on renal function. Results from the hypertension detection and follow-up program. The Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group.

Authors:  N B Shulman; C E Ford; W D Hall; M D Blaufox; D Simon; H G Langford; K A Schneider
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 10.190

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Gender differences in hypertension: myths and reality.

Authors:  Michael Doumas; Vasilios Papademetriou; Charles Faselis; Peter Kokkinos
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Women-specific factors to consider in risk, diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Ronée E Harvey; Kirsten E Coffman; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-03

Review 3.  Sex and gender differences in hypertensive kidney injury.

Authors:  Jennifer C Sullivan; Ellen E Gillis
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2017-07-19

4.  Plasma lactate and incident hypertension in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.

Authors:  Stephen P Juraschek; Julie K Bower; Elizabeth Selvin; Ghanshyam Palamaner Subash Shantha; Ron C Hoogeveen; Christie M Ballantyne; J Hunter Young
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Sex-specific differences in cardiovascular risk factors and blood pressure control in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tziomalos; Vasilios Giampatzis; Maria Baltatzi; Elias Efthymiou; Konstantia Psianou; Natalia Papastergiou; Dimitra Magkou; Vagia Bougatsa; Christos Savopoulos; Apostolos I Hatzitolios
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Cardiovascular and mortality risk of apparent resistant hypertension in women with suspected myocardial ischemia: a report from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE Study.

Authors:  Steven M Smith; Tianyao Huo; B Delia Johnson; Vera Bittner; Sheryl F Kelsey; Diane Vido Thompson; C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine; Rhonda M Cooper-Dehoff
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Resistant hypertension, patient characteristics, and risk of stroke.

Authors:  Chen-Ying Hung; Kuo-Yang Wang; Tsu-Juey Wu; Yu-Cheng Hsieh; Jin-Long Huang; El-Wui Loh; Ching-Heng Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.