Literature DB >> 23302371

Influence of polishing procedures on the surface roughness of dental ceramics made by different techniques.

Osmir Batista Oliveira-Junior1, Leonardo Buso, Fábio Hiroshi Fujiy, Geraldo Henrique Leao Lombardo, Fernanda Campos, Hugo Ramalho Sarmento, Rodrigo Othavio Assuncao Souza.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of 2 different surface polishing procedures-glazing and manual polishing-on the roughness of ceramics processed by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and conventional systems (stratification technique). Eighty ceramic discs (diameter: 8 mm, thickness: 1 mm) were prepared and divided among 8 groups (n = 10) according to the type of ceramic disc and polishing method: 4 GZ and 4 MP. Specimens were glazed according to each manufacturer's recommendations. Two silicone polishing points were used on the ceramic surface for manual polishing. Roughness was measured using a surface roughness tester. The roughness measurements were made along a distance of 2 mm on the sample surface and the speed of reading was 0.1 mm/s. Three measurements were taken for each sample. The data (μm) were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Qualitative analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The mean (± SD) roughness values obtained for GZ were: 1.1 ± 0.40 μm; 1.0 ± 0.31 μm; 1.6 ± 0.31 μm; and 2.2 ± 0.73 μm. For MP, the mean values were: 0.66 ± 0.13 μm; 0.43 ± 0.14 μm; 1.6 ± 0.55 μm; and 2.0 ± 0.63 μm. The mean roughness values were significantly affected by the ceramic type (P = 0.0001) and polishing technique (P = 0.0047). The SEM images confirmed the roughness data. The manually polished glass CAD/CAM ceramics promoted lower surface roughness than did the glazed feldspathic dental ceramics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23302371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Dent        ISSN: 0363-6771


  4 in total

1.  Polishing effects and wear performance of chairside CAD/CAM materials.

Authors:  Mike Matzinger; Sebastian Hahnel; Verena Preis; Martin Rosentritt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effect of different coloring techniques and surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of monolithic zirconia.

Authors:  Rashin Giti; Shekoofeh Haghdoost; Elham Ansarifard
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-03-17

3.  An in vitro evaluation of the effect of polishing on the stainability of different CAD/CAM ceramic materials.

Authors:  Ala'a Abu-Obaid; Amjad AlMawash; Noura Alyabis; Nouf Alzaaqi
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-08-28

4.  Effects of Khat on Surface Roughness and Color of Feldspathic and Zirconia Porcelain Materials under Simulated Oral Cavity Conditions.

Authors:  Mohammed M Al Moaleem; Rashad AlSanosy; Nasser M Al Ahmari; Mansoor Shariff; Abdulkhaliq A Alshadidi; Hassan A Alhazmi; Asaad Khalid
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.