OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term effects of the EXBELT intervention program, which was designed to reduce belt restraint use and was found to be effective immediately after implementation, after 24 months. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental longitudinal design. SETTING:Thirteen nursing homes: seven assigned to control group and six to intervention group. PARTICIPANTS: A panel group (n = 225) of residents present at baseline and 24 months after baseline and a survey group (n = 689) of all residents present 24 months after baseline. The survey group included the panel group. INTERVENTION: EXBELT included four components: a policy change, an educational program, consultation, and availability of alternative interventions. MEASUREMENTS: The use of belt restraints 24 months after baseline was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included other types of physical restraints. An independent observer collected data four times during a 24-hour period. RESULTS: EXBELT resulted in a 65% decrease in belt use between baseline and 24 months after baseline in the panel group (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval = 0.13-0.93; P = .04). In the survey group, the proportion of residents using belts was 13% in the control and 3% in the intervention group (P < .001) 24 months after baseline. The use of the most restrictive types of restraints was significantly lower in the intervention group than the control group in the panel and survey groups. CONCLUSION: The EXBELT intervention was associated with long-term minimization of belt restraint usage in older nursing home residents. A multicomponent intervention including institutional policy change, education, consultation, and the availability of alternative interventions had an enduring effect on successful restraint reduction.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term effects of the EXBELT intervention program, which was designed to reduce belt restraint use and was found to be effective immediately after implementation, after 24 months. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental longitudinal design. SETTING: Thirteen nursing homes: seven assigned to control group and six to intervention group. PARTICIPANTS: A panel group (n = 225) of residents present at baseline and 24 months after baseline and a survey group (n = 689) of all residents present 24 months after baseline. The survey group included the panel group. INTERVENTION: EXBELT included four components: a policy change, an educational program, consultation, and availability of alternative interventions. MEASUREMENTS: The use of belt restraints 24 months after baseline was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included other types of physical restraints. An independent observer collected data four times during a 24-hour period. RESULTS: EXBELT resulted in a 65% decrease in belt use between baseline and 24 months after baseline in the panel group (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval = 0.13-0.93; P = .04). In the survey group, the proportion of residents using belts was 13% in the control and 3% in the intervention group (P < .001) 24 months after baseline. The use of the most restrictive types of restraints was significantly lower in the intervention group than the control group in the panel and survey groups. CONCLUSION: The EXBELT intervention was associated with long-term minimization of belt restraint usage in older nursing home residents. A multicomponent intervention including institutional policy change, education, consultation, and the availability of alternative interventions had an enduring effect on successful restraint reduction.
Authors: Tessa Rietbergen; Denise Spoon; Anja H Brunsveld-Reinders; Jan W Schoones; Anita Huis; Maud Heinen; Anke Persoon; Monique van Dijk; Hester Vermeulen; Erwin Ista; Leti van Bodegom-Vos Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Anna Brugnolli; Federica Canzan; Luigina Mortari; Luisa Saiani; Elisa Ambrosi; Martina Debiasi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Elisa Ambrosi; Martina Debiasi; Jessica Longhini; Lorenzo Giori; Luisa Saiani; Elisabetta Mezzalira; Federica Canzan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lee-Fay Low; Jennifer Fletcher; Belinda Goodenough; Yun-Hee Jeon; Christopher Etherton-Beer; Margaret MacAndrew; Elizabeth Beattie Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ramona Backhaus; Linda J M Hoek; Erica de Vries; Jolanda C M van Haastregt; Jan P H Hamers; Hilde Verbeek Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Vincent Ra Moermans; Angela Mhj Mengelers; Michel Hc Bleijlevens; Hilde Verbeek; Bernadette Dierckx de Casterle; Koen Milisen; Elizabeth Capezuti; Jan Ph Hamers Journal: Nurs Ethics Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 2.874