Literature DB >> 23301553

Small-diameter melanocytic lesions: morphological analysis by means of in vivo confocal microscopy.

G Pupelli1, C Longo, L Veneziano, A M Cesinaro, G Ferrara, S Piana, E Moscarella, C Ricci, I Zalaudek, S Seidenari, G Argenziano, G Pellacani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Small-diameter melanocytic lesions represent a diagnostic challenge for clinicians, as they do not follow the ABCD rule for diagnosis and do not always display reliable histopathological criteria.
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the confocal features of small-diameter lesions (naevi and melanomas with diameter ≤ 5 mm) to determine whether they show specific morphological criteria.
METHODS: Twenty-four melanomas and 72 naevi were subjected to dermoscopic and confocal evaluation along with histopathology. Significant dermoscopic and confocal differences between melanomas and naevi were evaluated by means of the Pearson χ(2) test. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each parameter. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify the reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) independently significant features for melanoma diagnosis.
RESULTS: The seven-point checklist dermoscopic score was ≥ 3 in 22 melanomas and in 33 naevi. The combination of cells' pleomorphism and architectural disorder (i.e. nonspecific pattern or irregular junctional nests upon confocal examination) are the most striking criteria for consistent diagnosis of small melanoma. The presence of atypical cells, more than five atypical cells per mm(2) , and roundish atypical cells at the dermoepidermal junction showed the highest odds ratios. From logistic regression, the presence of at least five pagetoid cells per mm(2) , tangled lines within the epidermis, and atypical roundish cells at the dermoepidermal junction resulted in the three independent confocal parameters that characterized small melanomas.
CONCLUSIONS: Small melanomas frequently reveal specific dermoscopic and confocal features. Moreover, the combination of dermoscopy and RCM can lead to a correct diagnosis of a number of naevi that share some morphological aspects with melanomas.
© 2013 The Authors. BJD © 2013 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23301553     DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  15 in total

1.  The utility of the high-resolution ultrasound technique in the evaluation of autologous adipose tissue lipofilling, used for the correction of post-surgical, post-traumatic and post-burn scars.

Authors:  Maria Scotto di Santolo; Marco Sagnelli; Giovanni Tortora; Maria Angela Santoro; Pier Luigi Canta; Guido Molea; Fabrizio Schonauer; Massimo Imbriaco
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the number needed to treat melanoma in doubtful lesions.

Authors:  I Alarcon; C Carrera; J Palou; L Alos; J Malvehy; S Puig
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 3.  Discriminating Nevi from Melanomas: Clues and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Cristina Carrera; Ashfaq A Marghoob
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  Melanocytic lesions ≤ 6mm: Prospective series of 481 melanocytic trunk and limb lesions in Brazil.

Authors:  Gabriella Campos-do-Carmo; Aretha Brito Nobre; Tullia Cuzzi; Giuseppe Argenziano; Carlos Gil Ferreira; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Rubeta N Matin; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Alana Durack; Abha Gulati; Sue Ann Chan; Louise Johnston; Susan E Bayliss; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Colette O'Sullivan; Hamid Tehrani; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

6.  Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Daniel Saleh; Naomi Chuchu; Susan E Bayliss; Lopa Patel; Clare Davenport; Yemisi Takwoingi; Kathie Godfrey; Rubeta N Matin; Rakesh Patalay; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

7.  Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Rubeta N Matin; David R Thomson; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Rachel Abbott; Monica Fawzy; Susan E Bayliss; Matthew J Grainge; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Fiona M Walter; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

8.  Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Daniel Saleh; Susan E Bayliss; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Lopa Patel; Rubeta N Matin; Colette O'Sullivan; Rakesh Patalay; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

Review 9.  The most common mistakes on dermatoscopy of melanocytic lesions.

Authors:  Grażyna Kamińska-Winciorek; Waldemar Placek
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Recognizing the benefits and pitfalls of reflectance confocal microscopy in melanoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Alon Scope; Caterina Longo
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2014-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.