| Literature DB >> 23300910 |
Li-Bo Dai1, Shui-Hong Zhou, Ling-Xiang Ruan, Zhou-Jun Zheng.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Angiomatous nasal polyps (ANPs), also known as angiectatic polyps, have rarely been reported in the literature. ANPs are characterized by extensive vascular proliferation and ectasia. ANPs can grow rapidly and exhibit aggressive clinical behavior that could simulate malignancy preoperatively, and they are easily confused with other diseases. In the present study, we analyzed the correlation between the computed tomography (CT) findings of nasal angiomatous polyps and their pathological features.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23300910 PMCID: PMC3534041 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The demographic and clinical characteristics of 31 angiomatous nasal polyps.
| Characteristic | Number (%) |
|
| |
| Mean | 53.5±11.5 |
| >70 | 5(16.1) |
| 40∼70 | 16(51.6) |
| <40 | 10(32.3) |
|
| |
| Male | 16(51.6) |
| Female | 15(48.4) |
|
| |
| only unilateral NO | 7(22.6) |
| only unilateral NB | 5(16.1) |
| unilateral NO +NB | 11(35.5) |
| unilateral NO +ND | 4(12.9) |
| ophthalmoptosis | 3(9.7) |
| facial swelling and pain | 1(3.2) |
| bilateral nasal obstruction | 3(9.7) |
|
| |
| snare resection | 6(19.4) |
| Caldwell-Luc operation | 1(3.2) |
| tobacco use | 10(32.5) |
| alcohol abuse+ tobacco use | 5(16.1) |
| hypertension | 5(16.1) |
Note: NO: nasal obstruction; NB: nasal bleeding; ND: nasal discharge.
Number and Percentage of Patients Having a Particular Nasal Endoscopy Sign and the Average Lund-Kennedy (LK) Score (and Ranges) for Each Sign.
| Nasal Endsocopy Sign | Number (%) | Average Score | Range of Scores |
| Discharge | 4(12.9) | 2.10±0.78 | 0–3 |
| Edema | 20(64.5) | 0.57±0.10 | 0–2 |
| Polyp | 25(80.6) | 1.89±0.34 | 0–6 |
| Scarring/adhesions | 6(19.4) | 0.71±0.21 | 0–2 |
| Crusting | 3(9.7) | 0.68±0.11 | 0–2 |
| None | 2(6.5) | 0 | 0–0 |
| Total | 29(93.5) | 2.54±0.56 | 0–16 |
CT and average Lund-MacKay (LM) Score.
| Sinus CT Scan Region | Number (%) | Average LM Score | Range of Scores |
| Maxillary | 24(77.4) | 2.23±0.59 | 0–4 |
| Frontal | 4(12.9) | 1.01±0.33 | 0–2 |
| Anterior ethmoid | 14(45.2) | 2.87±0.78 | 0–4 |
| Posterior ethmoid | 3(9.7) | 1.67±0.43 | 0–3 |
| Sphenoid | 0 | / | / |
| Ostiomeatal complex | 16(51.6) | 2.55±0.98 | 0–4 |
| Total | 31(100.0) | 6.23±0.76 | 0–20 |
CT features of 31 angiomatous nasal polyps.
| Features | Number (%) | |
| Site | ||
| Nasal cavity | 7(22.6) | |
| Maxillary sinus | 24(77.4) | |
| Calcification | 2(6.5) | |
| Bony changes | 31(100.0) | |
| wall erosion andabsorption | Maxillary medial wall | 21(67.7) |
| Maxillary posterior lateral wall | 3(9.7) | |
| Maxillary upper wall | 2(6.5) | |
| Enlarged nasal cavity and/or maxillary | 28(90.3) | |
| Bony sclerosis | 25(80.6) | |
| Maxillary posterior lateral wall | 20(64.5) | |
| Maxillary upper wall | 5(16.1) | |
| Contrast enhancement | 6(19.4) | |
| minimal enhancement in edge of the lesions | 5(5/6) | |
| No enhancement in edge of the lesions | 1(1/6) | |
| No enhancement in centre of the lesions | 6(6/6) |
Clinical and CT imaging features in the angiomtous nasal polyps and diverse entities.
| Entities | Age/sex | Clinical features | origin | CT findings |
| Angiomatous nasal polyps | A wide age range, no gender predominance | varied and nonspecific, including unilateral nasal obstruction and epistaxis | Maxillary sinus, nasal cavity | A soft tissue mass extending from the maxillary sinus/nasal cavity. Isolated expansile nasal vault masses without a nasopharyngeal mass or nasal-nasopharyngeal masses of considerable size that did not invade either the pterygopalatine fossa or the sphenoid sinus. No enhancement or minimal enhancement in edge of the lesions. The edge of ANPs on CT is clear and does not invade the peripheral fat layer. |
| Juvenile angiofibroma | only in youngmales | The typical clinical symptoms are nasal obstruction and recurrent epistaxis. | posterior nasal fossa, close to the sphenopalatine foramen | an extension of the tumor into the pterygopalatine fossa This causes a widening of this space, with anterior bowing of the posterior antral wall, extension through the roof of the nasopharynx into the sphenoid sinus, and enhanced lesions on contrast CT scans |
| Vascular tumors | No sex, gender predominance | unilateral nasal epistaxis, or/and obstruction | Most in the anterior nasal septum | a soft tissue density mass may cause bone remodeling and destruction, greater enhancement on contrast-CT than ANPs |
| Nasal inverted papilloma | most commonlyin the 6th to 8thdecade of life.male preponderance | unilateral nasal epistaxis,obstruction, recurrent, a potentialfor malignancy. There is anassociation with synchronouscancer in 10% | the most commonsite of origin is thelateral nasal wall | Homogeneous soft tissue mass; it has a density like that of soft tissue and may contain calcium. Focal bone remodeling and sclerosis are also frequently seen. The mass shows heterogeneous enhancement after injection of contrast material. |
| Non-invasive fungal rhinosinusitis | an increased incidence inelderly females | nasal stuffiness, bloody discharge | Most common site is maxillary | The presence of diffuse increased attenuation within the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity should be considered as chronic allergic hypersensitivity aspergillosis, along mottled hyperdense foci of variable size. Bony destruction associated with fungal infection is rare. |
| Malignant tumor | Peak incidenceis in the sixth andseventh decades,with a malepredominance | nasal obstruction with epistaxys,with a relatively short diseasehistory | the maxillary sinus and the nasal cavity as the most common sites of origin | The bony erosion of malignant tumors is destructive and the edges are indistinct; moreover, the peripheral fat layer is invaded and disappears. On a contrast-CT scan, malignant tumors show heterogeneous enhancement, but hyperostosis and removal of maxillary/nasal cavity walls are rare |