BACKGROUND: Snakebite is a global health issue and treatment with antivenom continues to be problematic. Brown snakes (genus Pseudonaja) are the most medically important group of Australian snakes and there is controversy over the dose of brown snake antivenom. We aimed to investigate the clinical and laboratory features of definite brown snake (Pseudonaja spp.) envenoming, and determine the dose of antivenom required. METHODS AND FINDING: This was a prospective observational study of definite brown snake envenoming from the Australian Snakebite Project (ASP) based on snake identification or specific enzyme immunoassay for Pseudonaja venom. From January 2004 to January 2012 there were 149 definite brown snake bites [median age 42 y (2-81 y); 100 males]. Systemic envenoming occurred in 136 (88%) cases. All envenomed patients developed venom induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC), with complete VICC in 109 (80%) and partial VICC in 27 (20%). Systemic symptoms occurred in 61 (45%) and mild neurotoxicity in 2 (1%). Myotoxicity did not occur. Severe envenoming occurred in 51 patients (38%) and was characterised by collapse or hypotension (37), thrombotic microangiopathy (15), major haemorrhage (5), cardiac arrest (7) and death (6). The median peak venom concentration in 118 envenomed patients was 1.6 ng/mL (Range: 0.15-210 ng/mL). The median initial antivenom dose was 2 vials (Range: 1-40) in 128 patients receiving antivenom. There was no difference in INR recovery or clinical outcome between patients receiving one or more than one vial of antivenom. Free venom was not detected in 112/115 patients post-antivenom with only low concentrations (0.4 to 0.9 ng/ml) in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Envenoming by brown snakes causes VICC and over a third of patients had serious complications including major haemorrhage, collapse and microangiopathy. The results of this study support accumulating evidence that giving more than one vial of antivenom is unnecessary in brown snake envenoming.
BACKGROUND: Snakebite is a global health issue and treatment with antivenom continues to be problematic. Brown snakes (genus Pseudonaja) are the most medically important group of Australian snakes and there is controversy over the dose of brown snake antivenom. We aimed to investigate the clinical and laboratory features of definite brown snake (Pseudonaja spp.) envenoming, and determine the dose of antivenom required. METHODS AND FINDING: This was a prospective observational study of definite brown snake envenoming from the Australian Snakebite Project (ASP) based on snake identification or specific enzyme immunoassay for Pseudonaja venom. From January 2004 to January 2012 there were 149 definite brown snake bites [median age 42 y (2-81 y); 100 males]. Systemic envenoming occurred in 136 (88%) cases. All envenomed patients developed venom induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC), with complete VICC in 109 (80%) and partial VICC in 27 (20%). Systemic symptoms occurred in 61 (45%) and mild neurotoxicity in 2 (1%). Myotoxicity did not occur. Severe envenoming occurred in 51 patients (38%) and was characterised by collapse or hypotension (37), thrombotic microangiopathy (15), major haemorrhage (5), cardiac arrest (7) and death (6). The median peak venom concentration in 118 envenomed patients was 1.6 ng/mL (Range: 0.15-210 ng/mL). The median initial antivenom dose was 2 vials (Range: 1-40) in 128 patients receiving antivenom. There was no difference in INR recovery or clinical outcome between patients receiving one or more than one vial of antivenom. Free venom was not detected in 112/115 patientspost-antivenom with only low concentrations (0.4 to 0.9 ng/ml) in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Envenoming by brown snakes causes VICC and over a third of patients had serious complications including major haemorrhage, collapse and microangiopathy. The results of this study support accumulating evidence that giving more than one vial of antivenom is unnecessary in brown snake envenoming.
Snake envenoming is a major problem in many parts of the world. [1] It has been estimated that there are over 440,000 snake envenomings and 20,000 deaths every year. [2] Although antivenom is the major treatment for snake bite there are ongoing issues with the effectiveness and dose of antivenom, and deaths continue to occur despite antivenom and good supportive care, even in developed countries. [3].The widely distributed elapid genus of brown snakes (Pseudonaja spp.) (Figure 1) accounts for the majority of cases of severe envenoming and deaths from snakebite in Australia. [4] The correct dose of brown snake antivenom has been the subject of considerable debate and change over time. Antivenom is expensive and has a limited shelf life making it difficult for rural hospitals to maintain adequate supplies, particularly if large doses are being recommended. [5] Antivenom also has the potential for anaphylactic reactions [6] and serum sickness making it important to balance treatment benefit with the risk of adverse reactions.
Figure 1
Brown snake (Pseudonaja textilis). Photo taken by Gunther Schmida.
Brown Snake Antivenom has been available from CSL Ltd. since 1956 and one vial (1000 Units) is aimed at neutralising the average yield of venom from one milking of an eastern brown snake (Pseudonaja textilis); one unit (1 U) of antivenom is defined as the amount required to neutralise 0.01 mg of dried venom [7], [8]. This dose is therefore expected to cover the most extreme theoretical possibility that the venom yield on milking is completely injected by the snake bite (i.e. the venom glands are almost completely emptied and no venom is left on the skin) and this amount is completely absorbed (i.e. none is inactivated locally in the tissues mast cell and macrophage responses). However, measurement of venom concentrations in vivo provide a better estimate of the actual venom load in human bite cases. Recent studies in Australian snakebite have found venom concentrations in patients that suggest a much smaller typical venom load and that usually only a small proportion of the venom reaches the central circulation. [9], [10].Although it is well known that the main feature of brown snake envenoming is venom induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC), [11], [12], [13] less common clinical effects are not well defined. [14] Major haemorrhage causing death has received widespread publicity, and early collapse and cardiac arrest also appear to be an important cause of death from brown snake envenoming. [15], [16].Here we report a large series of proven brown snake envenoming cases to better describe the clinical syndrome of brown snake envenoming and to determine whether one vial of brown snake antivenom is sufficient to treat brown snake envenoming.
Methods
This study was part of the Australian snakebite project (ASP) which prospectively recruits suspected and definite snake bite patients from more than one hundred hospitals across Australia and referrals from all major Australian poison centres. We reviewed all cases of definite brown snake envenoming. The recruitment, design and data collection have been described previously. [6], [17] Approval was obtained from several Human Research and Ethics Committees to cover all involved institutions.Patient demographics, laboratory results, clinical effects, treatments and outcomes are all documented as part of ASP onto our case report forms that are faxed by the treating doctor to the study coordinating centre where the data is entered into a relational database. Where possible, patient serum is collected pre and post antivenom administration, centrifuged, and stored at −80°C for venom concentration quantification.Patients were included in this study if the snake was identified by an expert or if brown snake venom was detected in the serum. All cases recruited to ASP between January 2004 and January 2012 were reviewed if they were identified as possible brown snake bites or envenoming cases based on expert snake identification, positive snake venom detection kit (sVDK) for brown snake venom, or clinical suspicion. Cases of VICC positive for tiger snake or taipan venom on sVDK on bite site or urine, but found to be negative in the serum for either venom were then tested with formal venom-specific enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for brown snake, and included if positive. The sVDK was not used as an inclusion criterion in the absence of expert snake identification or brown snake venom detected with venom-specific enzyme immunoassay.Cases were classified into envenomation syndromes: VICC (complete or partial), myotoxicity, thrombotic microangiopathy and systemic symptoms, as previously described. [17] Complete VICC is defined as undetectable fibrinogen and/or raised D-Dimer (at least 10 times the assay cut-off or >2.5 mg/L) and an international normalised ratio (INR) >3. Partial VICC is defined as low but detectable fibrinogen, elevated D-Dimer and a maximum INR <3. Other defined clinical effects were haemorrhage (type of haemorrhage; major haemorrhage was defined as an intracranial haemorrhage, large gastrointestinal haemorrhage with a drop in haemoglobin or any other life-threatening haemorrhage), early hypotensive collapse, cardiac arrest, seizure, electrocardiogram (ECG) changes and troponin concentrations. Treatment, complications and adverse events were analysed, including systemic hypersensitivity reactions to antivenom, which were defined as anaphylaxis if they met NIAID/FAAN consensus criteria for this diagnosis, [18] and defined as severe according to the grading system developed by Brown. [19].Bite locations were converted into latitude and longitude coordinates using http://www.csu.edu.au/australia/latlong/index.html, to plot a distribution map. In line with recent taxonomic revisions, [20] cases were divided into Pseudonaja species groupings based on non-overlapping geographical regions: P. textilis (Eastern Australia); P. nuchalis (‘Top End’, Northern Territory) and ‘Western Australia’ including P. modesta, P. mengdeni and P. affinis. Locations outside these regions or where there was significant overlap were not included in this sub-group analysis.All antivenom used in the study was equine F(ab’)2 and was manufactured by CSL Ltd. The dose of antivenom is defined as the amount administered before the first available post-antivenom blood sample for venom-specific enzyme immunoassay. Polyvalent antivenom contains on average the equivalent of eight vials of brown snake antivenom, based on a study of CSL terrestrial snake antivenoms. [21] In patients given polyvalent antivenom the dose was converted to the equivalent number of brown snake antivenom vials using this 8 to 1 conversion. The total dose was also calculated for each patient receiving further antivenom.Methods for the enzyme immunoassay have previously been described. [10] Polyclonal antibodies (IgG) to brown snake venom raised in rabbits are used, with detection by biotinylated antibodies and streptavidin horseradish peroxidase. The limit of detection for brown snake venom was 0.15 ng/ml. The peak pre-antivenom venom concentration is reported where available. An enzyme immunoassay using labelled anti-Horse IgG was also used to detect antivenom in patient serum to confirm antivenom administration.Medians, interquartile ranges (IQR) and ranges are used to report continuous data, and proportions were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For the enzyme immunoassay standard curves were fitted by linear and non-linear regression using both Excel and Prism 5.03 for Windows [GraphPad Software, San Diego California USA, www.graphpad.com].
Results
There were 226 possible brown snake bites recruited to ASP and 149 of these were definite brown snake bites by our definition and included in our analysis, 13 of which were non-envenomed. Of the excluded patients, 73 patients had no pre-antivenom serum available for testing and four patients had no brown snake venom detected but had either Notechis sp. or Tropidechis carinatus venom detected. The snake was identified in 20 of the 136 envenomed patients.Demographics of the 136 patients with definite brown snake envenoming are summarised in Table 1. The median patient age was 42 years (IQR: 25 to 53, Range: 2 to 81) and the majority were male (100; 74%). The distribution of bite locations is shown in Figure 2. Most bites occurred in Queensland, Western Australia and New South Wales with only one case in Victoria. Most patients were bitten while undertaking yard work or gardening (40), when walking or in the bush (44), or intentionally interacting with the snake (41); only eight patients were bitten indoors.
Table 1
Demographic features of 136 definite brown snake envenoming cases.
Age [yr] (median, range)
42; (2–81)
Sex (Male)
100
74%
State/Territory
VIC
1
1%
WA
42
31%
QLD
52
38%
NSW
30
22%
SA
1
1%
NT
10
7%
Bite site
Upper Limb
55
40%
Lower Limb
81
60%
PBI
121
89%
Antivenom
128
94%
Snake Handler
10
7%
Alcohol involved
8
6%
Activity*
Gardening/outdoor work
40
29%
Intentionally interacting with snake
41
30%
Bush/walking/playing
45
33%
Indoors
8
6%
Other
1
1%
not known in one case.
Figure 2
Distribution of definite brown snake bites including envenomed patients (+) and non-envenomed patients(•).
not known in one case.The clinical effects of the 136 envenomed patients are summarised in Table 2. VICC occurred in all patients, systemic symptoms in 61 patients (45%), mild neurotoxicity in only two patients (2%) and myotoxicity in none. There were six deaths, five of which occurred following an early cardiac arrest and subsequent multi-organ failure/hypoxic injury and one from an intracranial haemorrhage (Table 3). Severe envenoming occurred in 51 (38%) of patients which includes collapse/hypotension, seizure, cardiac arrest, major haemorrhage, thrombotic microangiopathy or death. The grouping of patients into each clinical syndromes including the numbers in each group is shown in Figure 3. Local effects were minor in all cases, with local pain in 70 (51%) and fang marks in 98 (72%).
Table 2
Clinical features of the 136 patients with definite brown snake envenoming.
Clinical Syndrome/Effects
Number
%
VICC
Complete
109
80%
Partial
27
20%
Bleeding
Major haemorrhage
5
4%
Intracranial Haemorrhage
2
1%
Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage
3
2%
Bite site
32
24%
Intravenous cannula site
43
32%
Gum bleeding
19
14%
Neurotoxicity (mild)
2
1%
Myotoxicity
0
Systemic Symptoms
Nausea
71
52%
Vomiting
44
32%
Headache
78
57%
Abdominal Pain
37
27%
Diaphoresis
49
36%
Diarrhoea
11
8%
Cardiovascular Effects
Early collapse/hypotension
37
27%
Cardiac arrest
7
5%
Seizures
8
6%
Thrombotic microangiopathy
15
11%
Acute renal failure
11
8%
Abnormal creatinine
14
10%
Table 3
Details of the six deaths from brown snake envenoming.
Sex/Age
Collapse Onset
Antivenom Dose
Details
M43
minutes
5 vials BSAV
Bitten at desk. Early cardiac arrest, CPR by family.
M20
unknown
6 vials BSAV
Found unconscious after running; very hot day; hyperthermic
F61
40 minutes
5 vials PVAV
Bitten while gardening, chest pain, seizure and asystolic arrest
M16
unknown
5 vials BSAV, 1 vial PVAV
Picked up snake in bush. Found collapsed, asystolic, no CPR by bystanders.
F10
minutes
8 vials BSAV, 1 vial PVAV
Walking in garden, collapsed, CPR by family
F69
None
5 vials BSAV
Severe uncontrolled hypertension for several hours while remaining coagulopathic, followed by sudden onset of headache then drowsiness 17 hrs post bite; CT scan: large cerebral haemorrhage
Number of patients with partial or complete venom induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC), collapse or no collapse, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), major haemorrhage and death.
CPR – cardiopulmonary resuscitation; PVAV – polyvalent antivenom; BSAV – brown snake antivenom.Complete VICC developed in 109 patients (80%) and partial VICC in 27 (20%). The median time to recovery of complete VICC to an INR of less than 2 was 15.5 hours (IQR: 11.5 to 19.4 hr; n = 105). Three patients died with an INR greater than 2 and one patient was discharged with an INR of 3.1. The median time from complete VICC to a normal INR (<1.3) was 23.3 hours (IQR: 18.3 to 37.3 hr; n = 83). Twenty two patients were discharged with an INR of 1.3 or greater. Major haemorrhage occurred in five cases, three gastrointestinal haemorrhages and two intracranial haemorrhages both associated with hypertension. Table 4 provides a comparison between patients with VICC and partial VICC which shows that more severe effects occurred in patients with complete VICC except thrombotic microangiopathy which occurred with similar frequency in partial VICC.
Table 4
Comparison of the clinical effects between patients with complete VICC and partial VICC.
Clinical Effects
Complete VICC (109)
%
Partial VICC (27)
%
Bleeding
Major haemorrhage
5
5%
0
Intracranial Haemorrhage
2
2%
0
Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage
3
3%
0
Bite site
29
27%
3
11%
Intravenous cannula site
40
37%
3
11%
Gum bleeding
18
17%
1
4%
Minor Haemorrhage
48
44%
3
11%
Neurotoxicity (mild)
2
2%
0
Systemic Symptoms
53
49%
8
30%
Other Effects
Early collapse/hypotension
37
34%
0
Acute renal failure
8
7%
3
11%
Abnormal creatinine
9
8%
5
19%
Thrombotic microangiopathy
11
10%
4
15%
Cardiac arrest
7
6%
0
Seizures
8
7%
0
Death
6
6%
0
Early collapse and/or hypotension occurred in 37 patients. In 19 patients with a known time of collapse this occurred a median of 30 minutes (range: 2 to 90 min) after the bite. Cardiac arrest occurred in seven patients with collapse and four of these were fatal. Non-fatal cardiac arrests received prompt cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Eight patients of the 37 had generalised seizures, seven of which were hypotensive immediately prior to the seizure. No ventricular arrhythmias were reported at the time of collapse or cardiac arrest. Two patients had atrial fibrillation.ECG and troponins were not routinely done in all patients. Three patients with early collapse had abnormal electrocardiograms (ST segment depression, atrial fibrillation and widespread T wave inversions). Troponin was measured in only 24 patients; the median troponin was somewhat higher in the 12 who had collapsed than the 12 who did not [0.7 µg/L (range: 0.05 to 22.4 µg/L) vs. 0.17 µg/L (0.01 to 2.4 µg/L)].Fifteen patients (11%) developed thrombotic microangiopathy with thrombocytopenia and fragmented red blood cells in all 15 cases, acute renal failure with anuria/oliguria in ten cases and an abnormal creatinine without renal failure in five. One patient developed acute renal impairment without significant thrombocytopenia but had severe environmental hyperthermia. Another nine patients had an abnormal creatinine without all the features of thrombotic microangiopathy.Two patients had mild neurotoxicity. One developed ptosis prior to having an intracerebral haemorrhage. The second had unusual and fluctuating neurological findings including ptosis, lateral gaze diplopia, bulbar weakness, dysphonia and facial weakness.Venom concentrations and clinical effects were similar between the three groupings of brown snakes (Eastern or P. textilis, Northern and Western; Table 5) except more cases of hypotensive collapse and cardiac arrest occurred in the eastern group.
Table 5
Details of the three patients with low venom concentrations after their initial dose of antivenom.
Sex/Age
AVDose
Initial venom concentration
Venom concentration post-AV
Clinical Outcome
Time toINR <2
Comment*
F42
2
48
0.5
VICC with no complications
39 hr
INR 2.7, fibrinogen 0.9 g/L at 26 h post-bite; INR 1.3 at 39 h; discharged at 41 h with venom still detectable on last tested sample at 26 h.
M39
1
9.7
0.9
VICC with moderate thrombocytopenia
28 hr
INR >12 at 21 h; given 3 units FFP at 24 h; INR 1.5 at 28 h; INR 1.1 at 50 h; discharged at 72 h
M70
1
8.3
0.4
VICC with no complications
28 hr
INR 4.2 at 17 h; INR 1.4 at 27 h; discharged at 36 h with venom still detectable (0.4 ng/mL) and INR 1.1
AV – antivenom; FFP – fresh frozen plasma;
All times are post-bite.
AV – antivenom; FFP – fresh frozen plasma;All times are post-bite.Bite site swabs were tested using the sVDK in 117 envenomed patients and were positive for brown snake venom in 98 (84%), negative in 18 and inconclusive in one. A urine sVDK was done in 45 patients and was positive for brown snake venom in 40 and negative in 5.Pre-treatment serum samples were available in 131 envenomed cases and eight non-envenomed patients. Venom was not detected in any of the eight non-envenomed patients. The median peak venom concentration in the envenomed patients was 1.6 ng/mL (IQR: 0.6 to 5 ng/mL; range 0.15 to 210 ng/mL). There were no significant differences in brown snake venom concentrations between different groups of Pseudonaja sp. There was a significant difference in peak venom concentrations between patients who developed complete VICC compared with partial VICC (Table 5). The median peak concentration in patients developing collapse, cardiac arrest or death was not notably higher than for other patients (Table 6).
Table 6
Comparison venom concentrations for different clinical effects/severity and different Pseudonaja species groupings.
Number
Venom Concentration (Median, IQR)
p value
All Cases
131
1.6 (0.5–5)
Coagulopathy
VICC
105
2 (0.5–6.2)
0.0031
Partial VICC
26
0.8 (0.3–1.9)
-
Cardiovascular
Collapse
33
3 (0.45–7.7)
0.152
Cardiac Arrest
6
2.3 (0.9–43)
0.552
Death
5
3 (1.4–80)
0.252
Snake Group
Eastern
76
1.3 (0.5–5.5)
0.933
Western
41
1.8 (0.6–4.9)
-
Northern
10
1.8 (0.4–2.5)
-
compared to partial VICC (Mann-Whitney);
compared to all others (Mann-Whitney);
comparing the 3 groups (Kruskal-Wallis).
compared to partial VICC (Mann-Whitney);compared to all others (Mann-Whitney);comparing the 3 groups (Kruskal-Wallis).Antivenom was given in 128 envenomed patients with a median initial dose of two vials (IQR 2 to 5, Range 1 to 40). Further doses were given in 25 patients and the total dose in all patients was a median of two vials (IQR 2 to 5, Range 1 to 40). Twenty five patients received only one vial of antivenom initially, and five of these received a second dose of one vial (3), two vials (1) and eight vials (1). Clinical effects were similar in patients receiving an initial dose of one vial compared with more than one vial, including the frequency of collapse. Outcomes were similar between patients receiving an initial dose or a total dose of one vial and those receiving greater than one vial, including the time to recovery of VICC (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The median brown snake venom concentration of those receiving an initial dose of one vial was not significantly different to those receiving more than one vial [0.9 ng/ml (IQR: 0.3 to 5.3 ng/ml) vs. 2 ng/ml (IQR: 0.6 to 5.6 ng/ml; p = 0.26).
Figure 4
Time to recovery of VICC to an INR <2 comparing patients receiving and initial antivenom dose of one vial (N = 18, blue line), two vials (N = 43, green line), or three or more vials (N = 43, red line).
Figure 5
Time to recovery of VICC to an INR <2 comparing patients receiving a total antivenom dose of one vial (N = 15, blue line), two vials (N = 38, green line), or three or more vials (N = 51, red line).
Post-treatment samples were available in 115 patients given antivenom. Free venom was not detected in 112 patients, including in 16 patients after only one vial of antivenom. Three patients had low concentrations of venom detected post-antivenom (0.4 to 0.9 ng/ml) [Table 5]. Thirty eight of the 73 excluded possible brown snake bites had post-treatment samples available and free venom was not detected in any, including 12 patients receiving one vial of antivenom.Eight envenomed patients were not given antivenom, seven had only partial VICC and one presented late with VICC. The venom concentrations for 5 of the 8 patients who had serial blood samples available shows venom concentrations decreasing over 20 to 40 hours (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Plots of venom concentration versus time in five of the eight patients who were not given antivenom.
Four patients had anaphylaxis and 13 had skin-only reactions. There were no severe cases of anaphylaxis.
Discussion
In this series of over a hundred cases of brown snake envenoming, VICC occurred in every case and was partial in 20% of cases. Neurotoxicity was mild and rare, and myotoxicity did not occur. Cardiovascular effects were common with hypotensive collapse occurring in over a quarter of patients, although non-fatal and fatal cardiac arrests were uncommon. Deaths in all but one case were attributed to early pre-hospital collapse and cardiac arrest. Clinical outcomes following one vial of antivenom were similar to those found with larger doses and venom was only detected in three cases following antivenom and these concentrations were very low and the coagulopathy was improving (Table 5).The study emphasizes the importance of cardiovascular effects in brown snake envenoming. Although these effects are well recognised in brown snake envenoming the frequency and severity have not been well quantified in the past. Five of six deaths were a result of an early pre-hospital cardiac arrest/collapse which is unlikely to be treatable with antivenom. A recent animal study suggests that the collapse in Australasian elapids is a result of hypotension following vasodilation due to the release of endogenous mediators, and is not cardiac in origin. [22].Unfortunately ECGs and troponins were not routinely collected, but there were moderately elevated troponins in patients with collapse, and these appeared generally higher than those seen in patients who did not have a collapse. Further detailed investigation of patients with and without collapse is required to determine if the elevated troponin is secondary to the collapse, rather than a primary cardiac event.Thrombotic microangiopathy occurred in 11% of cases and was characterised by thrombocytopenia, acute renal impairment and microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia as evidenced by fragmented red blood cells and anaemia. [23] An unusual association was that thrombotic microangiopathy was just as frequent in partial VICC compared to VICC and not associated with cardiovascular collapse in those patients with VICC.The study also confirmed that neurotoxicity was rare in brown snake envenoming in humans, and only results in minor effects. This is consistent with recent studies of brown snake venom, [24] which showed the presynaptic neurotoxin in brown snake venom is far less potent than that in taipan venom, and constitutes a much smaller proportion of the venom. [24].The study demonstrates some of the difficulties with correlating the clinical effects in humans with the composition of the venom. A number of studies have identified the important venom proteins in P. textilis venom. [25], [26] Some of these venom proteins play a key role in human envenoming, such as the prothrombin activator Pseutarin C. Pseutarin C is a potent procoagulant in vitro
[27] and is the cause of VICC seen in patients in this study. However, some toxins identified in the venom, such as the presynaptic neurotoxin textilotoxin, and other long and short chain post-synaptic neurotoxins, do not appear to play an important role in human envenoming as evidenced by the lack of neurotoxicity in the majority of patients. The quantity and potency of the textilotoxin explains the lack of neurotoxicity in part. [24] However, it remains unclear why post-synaptic neurotoxins identified in the venom [25] do not result in neurotoxicity. [28] A number of other toxins found in P. textilis venom, such as textilinin, [25] do not appear to play a role in human envenoming. Finally, further study is required to determine the toxic mechanisms and specific toxins that cause the cardiovascular effects and thrombotic microangiopathy, which we have shown to be characteristic of brown snake envenoming.The geographical distribution of brown snake envenoming was notable with only one case in Victoria. Most brown snake bites occurred in North-Eastern Australia and Western Australia (Figure 2) and in these regions brown snake envenoming is likely to be the most important cause of snake envenoming. A comparison of three Pseudonaja groupings suggests that they are similar clinically and produce similar venom concentrations, which refutes previous suggestions that brown snakes from Western Australia cause more severe envenoming or inject more venom.Published opinions and guidelines have offered conflicting advice on antivenom dosing. [5], [7], [8], [29], [30] This case series supports that the much higher doses recommended previously are unnecessary and indeed shows that one vial of brown snake antivenom was sufficient, with similar recovery and outcomes compared with patients receiving larger doses. This is consistent with recent in vitro studies showing that one vial binds all circulating venom up to a concentration of 100 ng/ml [7] and will neutralise the procoagulant effects. [27] In addition, no further doses are required.Previous recommendations of larger doses of brown snake antivenom have been based on either the incorrect assumption that ongoing coagulopathy is due to inadequate antivenom, [5] or that the average venom yield used for calculating antivenom quantities was lower than that found in more recent milking studies. [31] However, even if brown snakes delivered 10 times the CSL calculated average venom yield, one vial should still be sufficient based on recent in vitro clotting studies. [7], [27] Unlike older animal work suggesting larger antivenom doses, [29], [32] these studies used venom at clinically relevant concentrations and show neutralisation of venom concentrations measured in this clinical study, with antivenom concentrations equivalent to dosing with one vial. [7], [27].We were unable to determine the proportion of brown snake bites that result in envenoming. The small proportion of non-envenomed cases in this series was due to the fact that if venom was not detected in blood most patients were excluded. Snake collection and identification by an expert was uncommon. Another limitation is the lack of routine cardiovascular investigation, including the regular collection of ECG and troponin data that were not specifically part of the research protocol or current clinical practice. In future it will be important for troponins and ECGs to be done in patients following collapse.This series confirms that VICC occurs in all brown snake envenoming cases, and over a third of patients develop complications related to envenoming (early collapse, major haemorrhage, thrombotic microangiopathy). The results of this study support accumulating evidence that giving more than one vial of antivenom is unnecessary in brown snake envenoming.
Authors: S Kulawickrama; M A O'Leary; W C Hodgson; S G A Brown; T Jacoby; K Davern; G K Isbister Journal: Toxicon Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Geoff W Birrell; Stephen Earl; Paul P Masci; John de Jersey; Tristan P Wallis; Jeffrey J Gorman; Martin F Lavin Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2005-11-10 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Hugh A Sampson; Anne Muñoz-Furlong; Ronna L Campbell; N Franklin Adkinson; S Allan Bock; Amy Branum; Simon G A Brown; Carlos A Camargo; Rita Cydulka; Stephen J Galli; Jane Gidudu; Rebecca S Gruchalla; Allen D Harlor; David L Hepner; Lawrence M Lewis; Phillip L Lieberman; Dean D Metcalfe; Robert O'Connor; Antonella Muraro; Amanda Rudman; Cara Schmitt; Debra Scherrer; F Estelle R Simons; Stephen Thomas; Joseph P Wood; Wyatt W Decker Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Kalana Maduwage; Margaret A O'Leary; Fiona E Scorgie; Seyed Shahmy; Fahim Mohamed; Chandana Abeysinghe; Harindra Karunathilake; Lisa F Lincz; Christeine A Gnanathasan; Geoffrey K Isbister Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2014-12-18
Authors: Isabelle Bolon; Andrew M Durso; Sara Botero Mesa; Nicolas Ray; Gabriel Alcoba; François Chappuis; Rafael Ruiz de Castañeda Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 3.240