Literature DB >> 23300491

Emerging function of fat mass and obesity-associated protein (fto).

Timo D Müller1, Matthias H Tschöp, Susanna Hofmann.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23300491      PMCID: PMC3536721          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Genet        ISSN: 1553-7390            Impact factor:   5.917


× No keyword cloud information.
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are a laborious but powerful tool to identify genetic risk factors associated with complex polygenic traits such as obesity [1], diabetes [2], or coronary artery disease [3]. The link between genetic variation in FTO and obesity was first described in a GWAS for type 2 diabetes [1] and was later independently confirmed in different populations all over the world. First described in 2007, genetic variation in FTO has since become one of the most solidly confirmed risk factor for polygenic obesity in humans; yet, information about how FTO affects metabolism is still scarce. Bioinformatic analyses suggest FTO codes for a Fe(II)- and 2-oxoglutarate–dependent nucleic acid demethylase [4], [5] that catalyzes demethylation of 3-methylthymine in single-stranded DNA [5]. However, how this proposed function of FTO is integrated into the complex network of energy metabolism control remains the object of intense scientific investigation. Analyses of genetically engineered mouse models, in which the function of Fto is either eliminated [6]–[8] or enhanced [9], support a role of Fto in energy metabolism but are inconsistent as to whether Fto modulates caloric intake, energy expenditure, or both. In 2009, global lack of Fto was reported to result in a lean phenotype as a consequence of increased energy expenditure [7]. Similar results were reported by another study [8], but both studies share two pitfalls. First, interpreting energy expenditure differences can be challenging when body composition differences are also present (see below). Second, germline loss of Fto causes perinatal lethality and growth retardation, which may give rise to secondary effects that are unrelated to the mechanism by which variation in FTO affects human metabolism [7], [8]. Notably, homozygous mice carrying a loss-of-function missense mutation in the C-terminal domain of Fto (367F) show no signs of perinatal lethality or growth retardation; they are lean, exhibit normal food intake and, when normalized by body weight, show increased energy expenditure [6]. While these studies appear to point to a potential role of Fto in regulating energy expenditure rather than food intake, mice globally overexpressing Fto are obese, hyperphagic, and exhibit normal energy expenditure when corrected for body fat or lean tissue mass [9]. In line with these data, most human studies report that obesity-predisposing FTO alleles are associated with increased food intake, but not energy expenditure (Table 1) [10]–[13].
Table 1

Overview about the most relevant Fto studies analyzing food intake and energy expenditure in mice and humans.

SpeciesIndividuals/Assessed PhenotypeSNP AnalyzedBW (Mouse) BMI (Human)Energy IntakeEEReference
MouseGlobal germline Fto kon/aFischer et al., (2009) Nature 458: 894–898
MouseGlobal germline Fto kon/a→↑Gao et al., (2010) PLOS ONE 5: e14005
MouseCNS-specific Fto kon/a→↑Gao et al., (2010) PLOS ONE 5: e14005
MouseGlobal LOF Fto missense mutationn/aChurch et al., (2009) PLOS Genet 5: e1000599
MouseGlobal Fto overexpressionn/aChurch et al., (2010) Nat Genet 42: 1086–1092
Human150 Scottish Caucasiansrs9939609Speakman et al., (2008) Obesity (Silver Spring) 16: 1961–1965.
Human151 German subjectsrs8050136Haupt et al., (2009) Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 117(4): 194–197
Human97 Scottish childrenrs9939609Cecil et al., (2008) N Engl J Med 359(24): 2558–66.
Human2,075 participants from the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) clinical trialrs1421085, rs3751812, rs9922708n/an/aMcCaffery et al. (2012) Am J Clin Nutr 95(6): 1477–86
Human711 Korean childrenrs9939973, rs9939609n/aLee et al., (2010) Clin Chim Acta 411(21–22): 1716–22.
Human1978 European- and African-American youthrs9939609n/aLiu et al., (2010) BMC Med Genet 11: 57
Human438 Healthy participants of the STRIP Studyrs9939609n/aHakanen et al., (2009) J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94(4): 1281–7
Human234 obese and 323 controls from Copenhagenrs9939609n/aBerentzen et al., (2008) J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(7): 2904–8
Human908 individuals from the Quebec City metropolitan arears17817449n/aDo et al., (2008) Diabetes 57: 1147–1150
Human908 individuals from the Quebec City metropolitan arears1421085n/aDo et al., (2008) Diabetes 57: 1147–1150
In summary, despite intense scientific discussion about whether Fto primarily affects energy expenditure or food intake [14], it remains unclear what role Fto plays in early development compared to adult life and which tissues and/or brain regions are involved in mediating the effects seen in the global Fto knock-out (ko) mice. An important step in solving these questions has now been taken by Roger Cox and colleagues. In the current issue of PLOS Genetics, McMurray et al. [15] report a series of elegant studies further elucidating the complexity of Fto with respect to how, when, and where it is most relevant for energy metabolism and shedding new light on the recently proposed role of Fto in protein metabolism [16]. In their manuscript, the authors recapitulate that germline loss of Fto leads to perinatal lethality, growth retardation, and a lower body weight that is accompanied by decreased body fat and lean tissue mass. However, in contrast to previous reports, the authors convincingly show that there is no difference in energy expenditure when the data are interpreted correctly, i.e., using a regression approach that takes into account potential confounding by differences in lean body mass. Several review articles have recently highlighted this issue [17], [18], and it is now clear that simply dividing raw energy expenditure results by lean body mass can lead to spurious conclusions. (This is illustrated quite nicely in Figure 3 of McMurray et al., where an apparent difference of energy expenditure per gram of lean body mass vanishes upon regression adjustment using ANCOVA.) Interestingly, total food intake was not changed in the germline Fto ko mice, whereas the ratio between CO2 production and O2 consumption (respiratory exchange ratio; RER) was decreased, suggesting that Fto ablation promotes protein and/or fat utilization. To circumvent the challenge of perinatal lethality and growth retardation, McMurray et al. used tamoxifen-inducible ubiquitin-cre mice to delete Fto at the time of sexual maturity. These adult onset Fto ko mice showed no increased lethality or growth retardation but had a lower body weight accompanied by a decreased lean mass and, interestingly, an increased body fat mass. No changes were observed in energy expenditure or total food intake, but, similar to the germline Fto ko, RER decreased in adult onset Fto ko mice, an effect also noted in a recent human study [19]. As central nervous system (CNS)-specific Fto deletion was recently reported to recapitulate the phenotype of the germline Fto ko mice [8], McMurray et al. further used an adenoviral associated approach to specifically knock out Fto in the mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH). Interestingly, these adult onset hypothalamic Fto ko mice showed no change in total body weight or body composition compared to sham controls but displayed a slightly decreased body weight gain that was accompanied by decreased food intake without any change in energy expenditure or RER. Taken together, these data indicate that although perturbation of Fto signaling in the MBH can impact food intake, sites other than the hypothalamus may be more important for Fto's influence on body composition and energy homeostasis. In summary, Cox and colleagues with their current publication have made several important contributions that allow for a better understanding and potentially improved targeting of Fto signaling in the control of energy homeostasis. The authors make a convincing case that Fto may not directly affect energy expenditure in mice, thereby also shedding some light on a complex methodological question. The authors furthermore show that adult, rather than perinatal, loss of Fto is well tolerated, enabling the analysis of Fto effects without the confounding factors associated with perinatal lethality or growth retardation. The authors also show that lack of Fto in the hypothalamus explains only a small part of the phenotype observed in the global Fto ko mice, indicating that Fto promotes its biological effects through other, non-hypothalamic pathways. Finally, the observation that RER is decreased in the germline and adult onset Fto ko mice points to a role of Fto in regulating peripheral metabolism and substrate utilization. The current paper by Cox and colleagues along with the other studies reviewed here highlight both the considerable challenges of, and the need for, careful and often time-consuming functional studies before the value of GWAS candidate genes can be truly appreciated.
  18 in total

1.  Variation in the FTO gene influences food intake but not energy expenditure.

Authors:  A Haupt; C Thamer; H Staiger; O Tschritter; K Kirchhoff; F Machicao; H-U Häring; N Stefan; A Fritsche
Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.949

2.  Polymorphisms of the FTO gene are associated with variation in energy intake, but not energy expenditure.

Authors:  John R Speakman; Kellie A Rance; Alexandra M Johnstone
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  FTO effect on energy demand versus food intake.

Authors:  John R Speakman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Crystal structure of the FTO protein reveals basis for its substrate specificity.

Authors:  Zhifu Han; Tianhui Niu; Junbiao Chang; Xiaoguang Lei; Mingyan Zhao; Qiang Wang; Wei Cheng; Jinjing Wang; Yi Feng; Jijie Chai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Inactivation of the Fto gene protects from obesity.

Authors:  Julia Fischer; Linda Koch; Christian Emmerling; Jeanette Vierkotten; Thomas Peters; Jens C Brüning; Ulrich Rüther
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  A recurring problem with the analysis of energy expenditure in genetic models expressing lean and obese phenotypes.

Authors:  Andrew A Butler; Leslie P Kozak
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.461

7.  The fat mass and obesity associated gene FTO functions in the brain to regulate postnatal growth in mice.

Authors:  Xue Gao; Yong-Hyun Shin; Min Li; Fei Wang; Qiang Tong; Pumin Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Overexpression of Fto leads to increased food intake and results in obesity.

Authors:  Chris Church; Lee Moir; Fiona McMurray; Christophe Girard; Gareth T Banks; Lydia Teboul; Sara Wells; Jens C Brüning; Patrick M Nolan; Frances M Ashcroft; Roger D Cox
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  A mouse model for the metabolic effects of the human fat mass and obesity associated FTO gene.

Authors:  Chris Church; Sheena Lee; Eleanor A L Bagg; James S McTaggart; Robert Deacon; Thomas Gerken; Angela Lee; Lee Moir; Jasmin Mecinović; Mohamed M Quwailid; Christopher J Schofield; Frances M Ashcroft; Roger D Cox
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The obesity-associated FTO gene encodes a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent nucleic acid demethylase.

Authors:  Thomas Gerken; Christophe A Girard; Yi-Chun Loraine Tung; Celia J Webby; Vladimir Saudek; Kirsty S Hewitson; Giles S H Yeo; Michael A McDonough; Sharon Cunliffe; Luke A McNeill; Juris Galvanovskis; Patrik Rorsman; Peter Robins; Xavier Prieur; Anthony P Coll; Marcella Ma; Zorica Jovanovic; I Sadaf Farooqi; Barbara Sedgwick; Inês Barroso; Tomas Lindahl; Chris P Ponting; Frances M Ashcroft; Stephen O'Rahilly; Christopher J Schofield
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Variation in the obesity risk gene FTO determines the postprandial cerebral processing of food stimuli in the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Martin Heni; Stephanie Kullmann; Ralf Veit; Caroline Ketterer; Sabine Frank; Fausto Machicao; Harald Staiger; Hans-Ulrich Häring; Hubert Preissl; Andreas Fritsche
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 7.422

2.  Hyperphagia: current concepts and future directions proceedings of the 2nd international conference on hyperphagia.

Authors:  Steven B Heymsfield; Nicole M Avena; Leslie Baier; Phillip Brantley; George A Bray; Lisa C Burnett; Merlin G Butler; Daniel J Driscoll; Dieter Egli; Joel Elmquist; Janice L Forster; Anthony P Goldstone; Linda M Gourash; Frank L Greenway; Joan C Han; James G Kane; Rudolph L Leibel; Ruth J F Loos; Ann O Scheimann; Christian L Roth; Randy J Seeley; Val Sheffield; Maïthé Tauber; Christian Vaisse; Liheng Wang; Robert A Waterland; Rachel Wevrick; Jack A Yanovski; Andrew R Zinn
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  The Demethylase Activity of FTO (Fat Mass and Obesity Associated Protein) Is Required for Preadipocyte Differentiation.

Authors:  Meizi Zhang; Ying Zhang; Jun Ma; Feima Guo; Qian Cao; Yu Zhang; Bin Zhou; Jijie Chai; Wenqing Zhao; Renbin Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The pathogenesis of obesity from a genomic and systems biology perspective.

Authors:  Candace Levian; Esmeralda Ruiz; Xia Yang
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2014-06-06

Review 5.  Nucleic acid oxidation in DNA damage repair and epigenetics.

Authors:  Guanqun Zheng; Ye Fu; Chuan He
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  FTO Genotype Interacts with Improvement in Aerobic Fitness on Body Weight Loss During Lifestyle Intervention.

Authors:  Corinna Sailer; Vera Schmid; Louise Fritsche; Tsvetelina Gerter; Fausto Machicao; Andreas Niess; Hans-Ulrich Häring; Norbert Stefan; Andreas Fritsche; Martin Heni
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.942

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.