Literature DB >> 23300294

The effect of perches in cages during pullet rearing and egg laying on hen performance, foot health, and plumage.

P Y Hester1, S A Enneking, K Y Jefferson-Moore, M E Einstein, H W Cheng, D A Rubin.   

Abstract

Enrichment of pullet cages with perches has not been studied. Our objective was to determine if access to metal perches during all or part of the life cycle of caged White Leghorns affected egg traits, foot health, and feather condition. Treatment 1 represented control chickens that never had access to perches during their life cycle. Treatment 2 hens had perches only during the egg laying phase of the life cycle (17 to 71 wk of age), whereas treatment 3 chickens had perches during the pullet phase (0 to 16.9 wk of age). Treatment 4 chickens always had access to perches (0 to 71 wk of age). Comparisons between chickens that always had perches with controls that never had perches showed similar performance relative to egg production, cracked eggs, egg weight, shell weight, % shell, and shell thickness. More dirty eggs occurred in laying cages with perches. Feed usage increased resulting in poorer feed efficiency in hens with perch exposure during the pullet phase with no effect during egg laying. Perches did not affect hyperkeratosis of toes and feet. The back claw at 71 wk of age broke less if hens had prior experience with perches during the pullet phase. In contrast, during egg laying, the back claw at 71 wk of age broke more due to the presence of perches in laying cages. Perches in laying cages resulted in shorter trimmed claws and improved back feather scores, but caused poorer breast and tail feather scores. In conclusion, enriching conventional cages with perches during the entire life cycle resulted in similar hen performance compared with controls. Fewer broken back claws but poorer feed efficiency occurred because of prior experience with perches as pullets. Perch presence during egg laying improved back feather scores with more trimmed nails but caused more dirty eggs, broken back claws, and poorer breast and tail feather scores. Although perches allow chickens to express their natural perching instinct, it was not without causing welfare problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23300294     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2012-02744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  5 in total

1.  Bone-remodeling transcript levels are independent of perching in end-of-lay white leghorn chickens.

Authors:  Maurice D Dale; Erin M Mortimer; Santharam Kolli; Erik Achramowicz; Glenn Borchert; Steven A Juliano; Scott Halkyard; Nick Seitz; Craig Gatto; Patricia Y Hester; David A Rubin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 2.  Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens.

Authors:  Andrew M Janczak; Anja B Riber
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Farm Environmental Enrichments Improve the Welfare of Layer Chicks and Pullets: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Dan Xu; Gang Shu; Yanting Liu; Pingwu Qin; Yilei Zheng; Yaofu Tian; Xiaoling Zhao; Xiaohui Du
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  The Effect of Cooled Perches on Immunological Parameters of Caged White Leghorn Hens during the Hot Summer Months.

Authors:  Rebecca A Strong; Patricia Y Hester; Susan D Eicher; Jiaying Hu; Heng-Wei Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Perch use by laying hens in a commercial aviary.

Authors:  D L M Campbell; M M Makagon; J C Swanson; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.352

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.