Literature DB >> 23299484

The efficacy of corneal cross-linking shows a sudden decrease with very high intensity UV light and short treatment time.

Jeremy Wernli1, Silvia Schumacher, Eberhard Spoerl, Michael Mrochen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Standard treatment in cases of progressive keratectasia is UV-triggered corneal cross-linking. For irradiances larger than 10 mW/cm(2) and treatment times below 10 minutes, the scientific proof of a biomechanical strengthening effect is insufficient. The authors investigated the biomechanical strengthening of ex vivo corneal tissue treated with irradiances between 3 mW/cm(2) and 90 mW/cm(2) and illumination times from 30 minutes to 1 minute, respectively.
METHODS: A total of 100 porcine eyes received riboflavin + UV treatment (constant irradiation dose of 5.4 J/cm(2)) with different intensities and illumination times and were randomly assigned into 10 groups. A control group (80 eyes) was not irradiated but underwent the same treatment otherwise. Young's modulus at 10% strain was determined for each strip after uniaxial stress-strain measurement. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference (α = 0.01) was found between the median value of Young's modulus of the treatment groups up to 45 mW/cm(2) (illumination times from 30 minutes to 2 minutes) compared with the control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups from 50 mW/cm(2) up to 90 mW/cm(2) (illumination times of less than 2 minutes) and the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: The ex vivo results of corneal cross-linking performed in porcine corneas show that the Bunsen-Roscoe reciprocity law is only valid for illumination intensities up to 40 to 50 mW/cm(2) and illumination times of more than 2 minutes. Further experiments are necessary to validate these results for in vivo human corneal tissue. Additionally, safety aspects at high intensities must be investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23299484     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-11409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  53 in total

1.  The efficacy of standard versus accelerated epi-off corneal cross-linking protocols: a systematic review and sub-group analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Miraftab; Hassan Hashemi; Mohammad Abdollahi; Shekoufeh Nikfar; Soheila Asgari
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Pulsed vs continuous light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking: in vivo qualitative investigation by confocal microscopy and corneal OCT.

Authors:  C Mazzotta; C Traversi; S Caragiuli; M Rechichi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Patterned corneal collagen crosslinking for astigmatism: computational modeling study.

Authors:  Ibrahim Seven; Abhijit Sinha Roy; William J Dupps
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 4.  Corneal collagen cross-linking: a review.

Authors:  David P S O'Brart
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-03-20

5.  Is accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus the way forward? Yes.

Authors:  M Tsatsos; C MacGregor; N Kopsachilis; D Anderson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Is accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus the way forward? No.

Authors:  C MacGregor; M Tsatsos; P Hossain
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Analysis of the effective dose of ultraviolet light in corneal cross-linking.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Kuan-Chen Wang; Chao-Kai Chang; Jui-Teng Lin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Systematic review and Meta-analysis comparing modified cross-linking and standard cross-linking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yi Liu; Ying-Nan Zhang; Ai-Peng Li; Jing Zhang; Qing-Feng Liang; Ying Jie; Zhi-Qiang Pan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 9.  Current perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL).

Authors:  Sandeepani K Subasinghe; Kelechi C Ogbuehi; George J Dias
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Comparative study of long-term outcomes of accelerated and conventional collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  J J Males; D Viswanathan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.