Literature DB >> 23298943

Impact of transapical aortic valve replacement on apical wall motion.

Israel M Barbash1, Danny Dvir, Itsik Ben-Dor, Paul J Corso, Steven A Goldstein, Zuyue Wang, Elizabeth Bond, Petros G Okubagzi, Lowell F Satler, Augusto D Pichard, Ron Waksman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent reports indicate that the transapical approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement may be associated with elevated cardiac enzymes, poor recovery of left ventricular function, and poor outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether transapical access is associated with apical dysfunction and to assess consequences on patient outcomes.
METHODS: In patients undergoing transapical aortic valve replacement, apical regional function was retrospectively assessed using the three standard echocardiographic long-axis views. Patients with abnormal baseline apical motion were excluded. Apical regional wall motion abnormality was assessed on preprocedural (baseline), immediate postprocedural (early [6 ± 2 days]), and late postprocedural (late [95 ± 76 days]) examinations. Apical regional wall motion abnormalities were categorized as normal, hypokinesis, or akinesis.
RESULTS: A total of 58 patients undergoing transapical aortic valve replacement were included in the present analysis. Of those, 16 (28%) developed early apical dysfunction. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the patients who developed early apical dysfunction and those who did not. Patients who received 26-mm valves were more likely to develop apical dysfunction (40% vs. 69%, P = .05). In total, 50% of patients with apical dysfunction (eight of 16) had complete recovery of apical function but tended to have lower ejection fractions (50% vs. 60%, P = .045) at long-term follow-up. No difference in short-term or long-term mortality was detected in these small patient cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial injury during transapical access resulted in apical dysfunction early after the procedure in 28% of patients. This apical dysfunction was transient in half of the patients and was associated with a decrease in left ventricular function but did not affect mortality.
Copyright © 2013 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23298943     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  4 in total

1.  Fully percutaneous transthoracic left atrial entry and closure as a potential access route for transcatheter mitral valve interventions.

Authors:  Toby Rogers; Kanishka Ratnayaka; William H Schenke; Merdim Sonmez; Ozgur Kocaturk; Jonathan R Mazal; Marcus Y Chen; Moshe Y Flugelman; James F Troendle; Anthony Z Faranesh; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.546

Review 2.  Non-transfemoral access sites for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Mariah Madigan; Rony Atoui
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Myocardial injury associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Authors:  Won-Keun Kim; Christoph Liebetrau; Arnaud van Linden; Johannes Blumenstein; Luise Gaede; Christian W Hamm; Thomas Walther; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Dos and don'ts in large animal models of aortic insufficiency.

Authors:  Miriam Weisskopf; Lukas Glaus; Nina E Trimmel; Melanie M Hierweger; Andrea S Leuthardt; Marian Kukucka; Thorald Stolte; Christian T Stoeck; Volkmar Falk; Maximilian Y Emmert; Markus Kofler; Nikola Cesarovic
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.