Literature DB >> 23298799

Guided implant surgery: what is the influence of this new technique on bone cell viability?

Pâmela Letícia dos Santos1, Thallita Pereira Queiroz, Rogério Margonar, Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes de Souza Carvalho, Roberta Okamoto, Ana Paula de Souza Faloni, Idelmo Rangel Garcia.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of implant osteotomy on immediate bone cell viability, comparing guided surgery for implant placement with the classic drilling procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this study, 20 rabbits were used. The animals were divided into a guided surgery group (GG) and a control group (CG) and were then divided into 4 subgroups--subgroups 1, 2, 3, and 4--corresponding to drills used 10, 20, 30, and 40 times, respectively. All animals received 5 osteotomies in each tibia, by use of the classic drilling procedure in one tibia and guided surgery in the other tibia. The osteotomized areas were removed and processed immunohistochemically for detection of osteocalcin, receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and caspase 3.
RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis showed that osteocalcin expression was initially higher in the CG and remained constant after drill reutilization. Although the expressions of RANKL and OPG were not statistically different for the GG and CG, the RANKL/OPG ratio tended to be higher for the GG. Moreover, caspase 3 expression was elevated in the GG, proportionally to the number of osteotomies, indicating an increase in the apoptosis index in the GG.
CONCLUSIONS: The classic drilling procedure is more favorable to cell viability than guided surgery.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23298799     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

1.  Systemic and local effects of radiotherapy: an experimental study on implants placed in rats.

Authors:  Mariana Raquel da Cruz Vegian; Bruno César Almeida Costa; Gabriela de Fátima Santana-Melo; Fernanda Herrera Costa Godoi; Estela Kaminagakura; Rubens Nisie Tango; Renata Falchete do Prado; Luciane Dias de Oliveira; Claudio Antonio Federico; Sarah de Oliveira Marco Avelino; Rafael Marques Neves; Luana Marotta Reis de Vasconcellos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Mechanical behavior and wall remodeling of blood vessels under axial twist.

Authors:  Hai-Chao Han; Qin Liu; Zong-Lai Jiang
Journal:  Yi Yong Sheng Wu Li Xue       Date:  2016-08

3.  Biophysical regulation of osteotomy healing: An animal study.

Authors:  Liao Wang; Maziar Aghvami; John Brunski; Jill Helms
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  Dynamics of bone healing after osteotomy with piezosurgery or conventional drilling - histomorphometrical, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis.

Authors:  Jônatas Caldeira Esteves; Elcio Marcantonio; Ana Paula de Souza Faloni; Fernanda Regina Godoy Rocha; Rosemary Adriana Marcantonio; Katarzyna Wilk; Giuseppe Intini
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  Evaluation of bone substitutes for treatment of peri-implant bone defects: biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses in the rabbit tibia.

Authors:  Pâmela Letícia Dos Santos; Rafael Scaf de Molon; Thallita Pereira Queiroz; Roberta Okamoto; Ana Paula de Souza Faloni; Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli; Eloá Rodrigues Luvizuto; Idelmo Rangel Garcia
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.