Literature DB >> 23298751

A spatiotemporal comparison between olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials.

Emilia Iannilli1, Stefan Wiens, Artin Arshamian, Han-Seok Seo.   

Abstract

The present study compared the temporal and spatial aspects of human olfactory and trigeminal processing. A relatively selective trigeminal stimulus, CO2, and a relatively selective olfactory stimulus, H2S, were delivered with an olfactometer to young, healthy volunteers. The analysis was performed in a classical (5-electrode, main ERPs peaks) and modern approach (high topographical resolution, inverse solution, source localization). Results of microstate segmentation highlighted 5 maps that generally described the two processes at cerebral level. The trigeminal response differed from the olfactory response up to 300ms after stimulus onset. In this time range, source analysis pointed out that the olfactory stimulation involved olfactory related areas, while trigeminal stimulation involved noxious/somatosensory specific brain areas. Moreover, from 300ms on our data showed a similarity between the two processes. Statistical parametrical mapping of the differences between conditions suggested greater activation in a specific motor/sniffing network for the CO2 stimulation (probably related to a regulation of the potential noxious stimulus) and a greater activation of the ipsilateral primary olfactory cortex for H2S.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23298751     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  5 in total

1.  Depicting the inner and outer nose: the representation of the nose and the nasal mucosa on the human primary somatosensory cortex (SI).

Authors:  Mareike Gastl; Yvonne F Brünner; Martin Wiesmann; Jessica Freiherr
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  FMRI correlates of olfactory processing in typically-developing school-aged children.

Authors:  Natalia M Kleinhans; Melissa Reilly; Matthew Blake; Gabriella Greco; Julia Sweigert; Greg E Davis; Francisco Velasquez; Fredrick Reitz; Dennis Shusterman; Stephen R Dager
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-12-02       Impact factor: 2.376

3.  Information-Theoretical Analysis of EEG Microstate Sequences in Python.

Authors:  Frederic von Wegner; Helmut Laufs
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.081

4.  Electrophysiological correlates of top-down attentional modulation in olfaction.

Authors:  Archana K Singh; Kazushige Touhara; Masako Okamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Sex differences in chemosensation: sensory or emotional?

Authors:  Kathrin Ohla; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.