Literature DB >> 23298608

New procedures for uterine prolapse.

Azar Khunda1, Arvind Vashisht, Alfred Cutner.   

Abstract

Traditionally, vaginal hysterectomy and Manchester repair were the surgical approaches to treating uterine prolapse; however, both are associated with a relatively high subsequent vaginal vault recurrence. Laparoscopic uterine suspension is a new way of maintaining uterine support. Many women are keen to keep their uterus for a variety of reasons, including maintaining reproductive capability and the belief that the uterus, cervix, or both, may play a part of their gender identity. Non-removal of the uterus may retain functional (e.g. bowel, bladder and sexual) benefits. Therefore, the concept of uterine preservation for pelvic-organ prolapse has been of interest to pelvic-floor surgeons for many decades. In this review, we provide an overview of the available evidence on treating uterine prolapse surgically. We describe techniques to support the vault during hysterectomy, and examine the evidence for uterine-sparing surgery. Comparative outcomes for vaginal, abdominal and laparoscopic routes will be made.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23298608     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  7 in total

1.  Pregnancy After a Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy: a Case Report.

Authors:  M Albowitz; V Schyrba; D Bolla; A Schöning; R Hornung
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Tommaso Simoncini; Eleonora Russo; Paolo Mannella; Andrea Giannini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Risk factors for recurrence after hysterectomy plus native-tissue repair as primary treatment for genital prolapse.

Authors:  Stefano Manodoro; Matteo Frigerio; Alice Cola; Federico Spelzini; Rodolfo Milani
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Native tissue repair for central compartment prolapse: a narrative review.

Authors:  Dorit Paz-Levy; David Yohay; Joerg Neymeyer; Ranit Hizkiyahu; Adi Y Weintraub
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Modified McCall culdoplasty versus Shull suspension in pelvic prolapse primary repair: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Federico Spelzini; Matteo Frigerio; Stefano Manodoro; Maria Lieta Interdonato; Maria Cristina Cesana; Debora Verri; Caterina Fumagalli; Martina Sicuri; Elena Nicoli; Serena Polizzi; Rodolfo Milani
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The Use of Tutomesh for a Tension-Free and Tridimensional Repair of Uterovaginal and Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Danilo Dodero; Luca Bernardini
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2015-09-06

7.  Transposition of Cardinal Ligaments for Stages II-III Uterine Prolapse: A Minimally Invasive Procedure.

Authors:  Mohamad K Ramadan; Dominique A Badr; Walid Saheb; Georges Wehbeh
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2018-02-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.