Literature DB >> 23298605

Lacosamide in pediatric and adult patients: comparison of efficacy and safety.

Alberto Verrotti1, Giulia Loiacono, Antonella Pizzolorusso, Pasquale Parisi, Oliviero Bruni, Anna Luchetti, Nelia Zamponi, Silvia Cappanera, Salvatore Grosso, Gerhard Kluger, Christine Janello, Emilio Franzoni, Maurizio Elia, Alberto Spalice, Giangennaro Coppola, Pasquale Striano, Piero Pavone, Salvatore Savasta, Maurizio Viri, Antonino Romeo, Paolo Aloisi, Giuseppe Gobbi, Alessandro Ferretti, Raffaella Cusmai, Paolo Curatolo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This multicenter, prospective study investigates the efficacy and safety of lacosamide adjunctive therapy in pediatric and adult patients with uncontrolled epilepsy.
METHOD: This study was carried out between September 2010 and December 2011 at 16 Italian and 1 German neurologic centers. Lacosamide was added to the baseline therapy at a starting dose of 1 mg/kg/day in patients aged <16 years (group A) and 100 mg daily in subjects aged 16 and older (group B), and titrated to the target dose, ranging from 3 to 12 mg/kg/day or from 100 to 600 mg daily, respectively. After completing the titration period, patients entered a 12-month maintenance period and they were followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary assessment of efficacy was based on the change from baseline in seizure frequency per 28 days and was evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months as follows: number and proportion of 100% responders, 50% responders, non-responders and worsening patients. Safety evaluation was also performed at 3, 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: A total of 118 patients (59 group A, 59 group B) with uncontrolled generalized and focal epilepsy were enrolled. Patient mean±SD age was 15.9±6.80 years and the age range was 4-38 years. At 3-month evaluation, of 118 treated patients 56 subjects (47.4% group A; 47.4% group B; p=0.8537) experienced at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency. At 6 and 12-month follow-up, the 50% responders were 57 (52.5% group A; 44.1% group B; p=0.4612) and 51 (47.4% group A; 39% group B; p=0.4573), respectively. Thirty-five subjects (30.5% group A; 28.8% group B; p=1) experienced side effects during the treatment period. The most common adverse events were dyspepsia for group A and dizziness for group B.
CONCLUSION: Lacosamide may be a useful and safe pharmacological treatment option for both pediatric and adult patients with uncontrolled seizures.
Copyright © 2012 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23298605     DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2012.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Seizure        ISSN: 1059-1311            Impact factor:   3.184


  10 in total

Review 1.  Comparing Safety and Efficacy of "Third-Generation" Antiepileptic Drugs: Long-Term Extension and Post-marketing Treatment.

Authors:  Charlotte S Kwok; Emily L Johnson; Gregory L Krauss
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  The efficacy of lacosamide as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in focal epilepsy and its use in status epilepticus: clinical trial evidence and experience.

Authors:  Sebastian Bauer; Laurent M Willems; Esther Paule; Christine Petschow; Johann Philipp Zöllner; Felix Rosenow; Adam Strzelczyk
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 6.570

3.  Lacosamide treatment of childhood refractory focal epilepsy: the first reported side effect in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Edibe Pembegul Yildiz; Melis Ulak Ozkan; Gonca Bektas; Tuğçe Aksu Uzunhan; Nur Aydinli; Mine Caliskan; Meral Ozmen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  Specific binding of lacosamide to collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP2) and direct impairment of its canonical function: implications for the therapeutic potential of lacosamide.

Authors:  Sarah M Wilson; Rajesh Khanna
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 5.  A Review of the New Antiepileptic Drugs for Focal-Onset Seizures in Pediatrics: Role of Extrapolation.

Authors:  Alexis Arzimanoglou; O'Neill D'Cruz; Douglas Nordli; Shlomo Shinnar; Gregory L Holmes
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.022

6.  Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in pediatric patients with focal seizures.

Authors:  Viktor Farkas; Barbara Steinborn; J Robert Flamini; Ying Zhang; Nancy Yuen; Simon Borghs; Ali Bozorg; Tony Daniels; Paul Martin; Hannah C Carney; Svetlana Dimova; Ingrid E Scheffer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Genomic and clinical predictors of lacosamide response in refractory epilepsies.

Authors:  Sinéad B Heavin; Mark McCormack; Stefan Wolking; Lisa Slattery; Nicole Walley; Andreja Avbersek; Jan Novy; Saurabh R Sinha; Rod Radtke; Colin Doherty; Pauls Auce; John Craig; Michael R Johnson; Bobby P C Koeleman; Roland Krause; Wolfram S Kunz; Anthony G Marson; Terence J O'Brien; Josemir W Sander; Graeme J Sills; Hreinn Stefansson; Pasquale Striano; Federico Zara; Chantal Depondt; Sanjay Sisodiya; David Goldstein; Holger Lerche; Gianpiero L Cavalleri; Norman Delanty
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2019-09-25

8.  Vertigo/dizziness as a Drugs' adverse reaction.

Authors:  Serafina Chimirri; Rossana Aiello; Carmela Mazzitello; Laura Mumoli; Caterina Palleria; Mariolina Altomonte; Rita Citraro; Giovambattista De Sarro
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2013-12

9.  Safety of lacosamide in children with refractory partial epilepsy.

Authors:  Ismail Pasha; Mahesh Kamate; D K Suresh
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Lacosamide monotherapy in clinical practice: A retrospective chart review.

Authors:  V Villanueva; B G Giráldez; M Toledo; G J De Haan; E Cumbo; A Gambardella; M De Backer; L Joeres; M Brunnert; P Dedeken; J Serratosa
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.209

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.