Literature DB >> 23297703

Peri-implant bone loss in cement- and screw-retained prostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marcelo L de Brandão1, Mario V Vettore, Guaracilei M Vidigal Júnior.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess and compare peri-implant marginal bone loss in cement- and screw-retained prostheses.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic database and manual searches were undertaken to identify trials, prospective or retrospective studies reporting on radiographic marginal bone loss around dental implants restored with cement- and/or screw-retained prostheses. Two reviewers independently conducted the article selection and data extraction. Random-effects models were used to obtain estimates of peri-implant marginal bone loss [mean, 95% confidence intervals (CI)].
RESULTS: Of the 1217 identified studies, nine finally met the inclusion criteria. Only two studies included both cement- and screw-retained prostheses, three assessed only screw-retained prostheses, and four evaluated only cement-retained prostheses. Pooled mean marginal bone loss was 0.53 mm (CI 95%, 0.31-0.76 mm) for cement-retained prostheses and 0.89 mm (CI 95%, 0.45-1.33 mm) for screw-retained prostheses.
CONCLUSION: There is no evidence to support differences in the marginal bone loss through indirect comparison between cement and screw-retained restorations.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23297703     DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  6 in total

1.  Impact of collar laser microtexturing on peri-implant health and disease: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Reza Amid; Anahita Moscowchi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions.

Authors:  Mohamed Tharwat Hamed; Hisham Abdullah Mously; Saeed Khalid Alamoudi; Abou Bakr Hossam Hashem; Ghada Hussein Naguib
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2020-01-14

3.  Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Odontuya Dorj; Chin-Kai Lin; Eisner Salamanca; Yu-Hwa Pan; Yi-Fan Wu; Yung-Szu Hsu; Jerry C-Y Lin; Hsi-Kuei Lin; Wei-Jen Chang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Immediate prosthesis over implants retained using abutments with flexible screws: A preliminary study.

Authors:  David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Blanca Serra-Pastor; José-Carlos Balaguer-Martí; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; Rubén Agustín-Panadero
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-12-01

5.  One-Piece Implants with Smooth Concave Neck to Enhance Soft Tissue Development and Preserve Marginal Bone Levels: A Retrospective Study with 1- to 6-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Axiotis; Paolo Nuzzolo; Carlo Barausse; Roberta Gasparro; Paolo Bucci; Roberto Pistilli; Gilberto Sammartino; Pietro Felice
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Marginal bone loss around cement and screw-retained fixed implant prosthesis.

Authors:  Muhammad-Hasan Hameed; Farhan-Raza Khan; Robia Ghafoor; Syed-Iqbal Azam
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-10-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.