Literature DB >> 23297327

Real-time sonoelastography of the plantar fascia: comparison between patients with plantar fasciitis and healthy control subjects.

Luca Maria Sconfienza1, Enzo Silvestri, Davide Orlandi, Emanuele Fabbro, Giulio Ferrero, Chiara Martini, Francesco Sardanelli, Marco Amedeo Cimmino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of axial-strain real-time sonoelastography in patients with plantar fasciitis compared with that in healthy control subjects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and patients' consent were obtained. Eighty feet of 80 patients (43 men, 37 women; mean age ± standard deviation, 46.3 years ± 8.7) with plantar fasciitis and 50 feet of 50 asymptomatic volunteers (27 men, 23 women; mean age, 44.3 years ± 8.0) were prospectively evaluated. Individuals graded heel pain with a visual analogue scale and underwent B-mode ultrasonography (US) and real-time sonoelastography. Maximum fascial thickness was measured, and two longitudinal images were recorded with both modalities. Two radiologists who were blinded to clinical symptoms independently reviewed images for hypoechoic echotexture and fascial-border blurring at B-mode US and semiquantitative elasticity score at real-time sonoelastography (blue, 1; green, 2; red, 3), with the fascia divided into proximal, intermediate, and distal sections.
RESULTS: No differences were found for sex (P = .999) or age distribution (P = .144) between groups. Fascial thickening, hypoechoic echotexture, and fascial-border blurring at B-mode US were increased in patients versus control subjects (P < .001), and fascial thickening and hypoechoic echotexture correlated with heel pain score (r > .475, P < .001). Plantar fasciae of patients (median score, 11; interquartile interval, 10-12) were less elastic than those of control subjects (median score, 7; interquartile interval, 6-7.25) (P < .001). Image interpretation yielded high interobserver reproducibility (κ ≥ .80). Pain and real-time sonoelastographic scores correlated significantly (r = 0.851, P < .001). Pain was associated with older age (t = 3.7, P < .001), fascial thickening (t = 7.3 [multiple stepwise regression model], P < .001), and total real-time sonoelastographic score (t = 10.2, P < .001) but not with sex, fascial-border blurring, or hypoechoic echotexture. Accuracy increased from 90.0% with B-mode US to 95.4% with real-time sonoelastography (P = .016).
CONCLUSION: Real-time sonoelastography can show plantar fasciitis, increase diagnostic performance of B-mode US, and assist in cases of inconclusive B-mode US findings. RSNA, 2013

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23297327     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  Technical feasibility of real-time elastography to assess the peri-oral region in patients affected by systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Paola Maria Cannaò; Valeriano Vinci; Fabio Caviggioli; Marco Klinger; Davide Orlandi; Francesco Sardanelli; Giovanni Serafini; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-07-29

2.  Plantar fascia anatomy and its relationship with Achilles tendon and paratenon.

Authors:  Carla Stecco; Marco Corradin; Veronica Macchi; Aldo Morra; Andrea Porzionato; Carlo Biz; Raffaele De Caro
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  "Soft, hard, or just right?" Applications and limitations of axial-strain sonoelastography and shear-wave elastography in the assessment of tendon injuries.

Authors:  C C Ooi; P Malliaras; M E Schneider; D A Connell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Plantar fascia softening in plantar fasciitis with normal B-mode sonography.

Authors:  Chueh-Hung Wu; Wen-Shiang Chen; Tyng-Guey Wang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Plantar fasciitis in athletes: diagnostic and treatment strategies. A systematic review.

Authors:  Federica Petraglia; Ileana Ramazzina; Cosimo Costantino
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-05-10

6.  Differentiating the acute phase of gout from the intercritical phase with ultrasound and quantitative shear wave elastography.

Authors:  Qiao Wang; Le-Hang Guo; Xiao-Long Li; Chong-Ke Zhao; Ming-Xu Li; Ling Wang; Xin-Ying Liu; Hui-Xiong Xu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound updated in 2017 by European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus.

Authors:  Luca Maria Sconfienza; Domenico Albano; Georgina Allen; Alberto Bazzocchi; Bianca Bignotti; Vito Chianca; Fernando Facal de Castro; Elena E Drakonaki; Elena Gallardo; Jan Gielen; Andrea Sabine Klauser; Carlo Martinoli; Giovanni Mauri; Eugene McNally; Carmelo Messina; Rebeca Mirón Mombiela; Davide Orlandi; Athena Plagou; Magdalena Posadzy; Rosa de la Puente; Monique Reijnierse; Federica Rossi; Saulius Rutkauskas; Ziga Snoj; Jelena Vucetic; David Wilson; Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Thigh muscles injuries in professional soccer players: a one year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Angelo Corazza; Davide Orlandi; Amedeo Baldari; Pietro Gatto; Marco Stellatelli; Claudio Mazzola; Roberto Galli; Stefano Longo; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Enzo Silvestri
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-02-24

9.  Sonoelastography of the distal third of the Achilles tendon in asymptomatic volunteers: correlation with anthropometric data, ultrasound findings and reproducibility of the method.

Authors:  Emanuela Capalbo; Michela Peli; Paola Stradiotti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Strain sonoelastography of inflammatory myopathies: comparison with clinical examination, magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic findings.

Authors:  Yoonah Song; Seunghun Lee; Dae Hyun Yoo; Ki-Seok Jang; Jiyoon Bae
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.