Isabel Filges1, Judith G Hall. 1. Department of Medical Genetics, BC Children's and Women's Hospital, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. ifilges@cfri.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the rate of prenatal detection of multiple congenital contractures, to identify reasons for the failure of prenatal diagnosis and to propose the first guidelines to improve prenatal diagnosis. METHOD: We evaluated records on 107 individuals recognized at birth to have Amyoplasia. We reviewed the literature on the onset and development of fetal activity, antenatal clinical signs in fetal movement disorders, prenatal studies of fetal movement and contractures by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and existing guidelines. RESULT: In 73.8%, the diagnosis was missed prenatally. Correct diagnosis was achieved by the identification of bilateral clubfeet on ultrasound or because mothers perceived reduced fetal movement. Ultrasound would be able to visualize contractures, joint positioning, the quality of fetal movements, lung size, muscle tissue, and bone growth in the first or early second trimester. MRI results are promising. Guidelines for assessing early fetal movement do not exist. CONCLUSION: Prenatal detection rate of multiple congenital contractures is appalling. Failure of diagnosis precludes further etiologic and diagnostic workup and deprives families of making informed pregnancy choices. Standards for prenatal diagnosis are lacking, but on the basis of current knowledge and expert opinion, we propose the first guidelines for a prenatal diagnostic strategy, discuss future directions and the need for multicentric studies.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the rate of prenatal detection of multiple congenital contractures, to identify reasons for the failure of prenatal diagnosis and to propose the first guidelines to improve prenatal diagnosis. METHOD: We evaluated records on 107 individuals recognized at birth to have Amyoplasia. We reviewed the literature on the onset and development of fetal activity, antenatal clinical signs in fetal movement disorders, prenatal studies of fetal movement and contractures by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and existing guidelines. RESULT: In 73.8%, the diagnosis was missed prenatally. Correct diagnosis was achieved by the identification of bilateral clubfeet on ultrasound or because mothers perceived reduced fetal movement. Ultrasound would be able to visualize contractures, joint positioning, the quality of fetal movements, lung size, muscle tissue, and bone growth in the first or early second trimester. MRI results are promising. Guidelines for assessing early fetal movement do not exist. CONCLUSION: Prenatal detection rate of multiple congenital contractures is appalling. Failure of diagnosis precludes further etiologic and diagnostic workup and deprives families of making informed pregnancy choices. Standards for prenatal diagnosis are lacking, but on the basis of current knowledge and expert opinion, we propose the first guidelines for a prenatal diagnostic strategy, discuss future directions and the need for multicentric studies.
Authors: Yavuz Bayram; Ender Karaca; Zeynep Coban Akdemir; Elif Ozdamar Yilmaz; Gulsen Akay Tayfun; Hatip Aydin; Deniz Torun; Sevcan Tug Bozdogan; Alper Gezdirici; Sedat Isikay; Mehmed M Atik; Tomasz Gambin; Tamar Harel; Ayman W El-Hattab; Wu-Lin Charng; Davut Pehlivan; Shalini N Jhangiani; Donna M Muzny; Ali Karaman; Tamer Celik; Ozge Ozalp Yuregir; Timur Yildirim; Ilhan A Bayhan; Eric Boerwinkle; Richard A Gibbs; Nursel Elcioglu; Beyhan Tuysuz; James R Lupski Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Miriam Potrony; Antoni Borrell; Narcís Masoller; Alfons Nadal; Leonardo Rodriguez-Carunchio; Karmele Saez de Gordoa Elizalde; Juan Francisco Quesada-Espinosa; Jose Luis Villanueva-Cañas; Montse Pauta; Meritxell Jodar; Irene Madrigal; Celia Badenas; Maria Isabel Alvarez-Mora; Laia Rodriguez-Revenga Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Gina Ravenscroft; Joshua S Clayton; Fathimath Faiz; Padma Sivadorai; Di Milnes; Rob Cincotta; Phillip Moon; Ben Kamien; Matthew Edwards; Martin Delatycki; Phillipa J Lamont; Sophelia Hs Chan; Alison Colley; Alan Ma; Felicity Collins; Lucinda Hennington; Teresa Zhao; George McGillivray; Sondhya Ghedia; Katherine Chao; Anne O'Donnell-Luria; Nigel G Laing; Mark R Davis Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Jill K Tjon; Gita M Tan-Sindhunata; Marianna Bugiani; Melinda M Witbreuk; Johannes A van der Sluijs; Marjan M Weiss; Laura A van de Pol; Mirjam M van Weissenbruch; Bloeme J van der Knoop; Johanna I de Vries Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: Emily J Todd; Kyle S Yau; Royston Ong; Jennie Slee; George McGillivray; Christopher P Barnett; Goknur Haliloglu; Beril Talim; Zuhal Akcoren; Ariana Kariminejad; Anita Cairns; Nigel F Clarke; Mary-Louise Freckmann; Norma B Romero; Denise Williams; Caroline A Sewry; Alison Colley; Monique M Ryan; Cathy Kiraly-Borri; Padma Sivadorai; Richard J N Allcock; David Beeson; Susan Maxwell; Mark R Davis; Nigel G Laing; Gianina Ravenscroft Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 4.123